The effect of arthrodesis, implant stiffness, and time on the canine lumbar spine

被引:21
|
作者
Asher, Marc A. [1 ]
Carson, William L. [3 ]
Hardacker, James W. [4 ]
Lark, Richard G. [1 ]
Lai, Sue Min [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, Kansas City, KS 66103 USA
[2] Univ Kansas, Med Ctr, Dept Prevent Med, Kansas City, KS 66103 USA
[3] Univ Missouri, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Columbia, MO 65211 USA
[4] Spine Inst, Carmel, IN USA
来源
JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES | 2007年 / 20卷 / 08期
关键词
posterior lumbar arthrodesis; pedicle screw instrumentation; stress shielding;
D O I
10.1097/BSD.0b013e31804c98e5
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Canine posterior lumbar instrumentation and fusion. Objectives: To study effects of implant rod size and time on the stiffness of related spine construct elements. Summary of Background Data: The ideal stiffness of posterior spinal implants to successfully treat clinical instability or deformity with minimal side effects is unknown. Methods: Twenty-six canines were divided into 7 groups: control, and 6 or 12-month survival after sham or lumbar L3-5 arthrodesis (facet, posterior, and posterolateral) with either 4.76 or 6.35 mm diameter rod-pedicle screw instrumentation. Axial flexion-compression stiffness of the L3-5 segment components and axial compression stiffness of the bypassed and adjacent anterior column elements were measured. Results: Posterior instrumentation initially increased flexion-compression stiffness of the L3-5 segment more than the intrinsic stiffness of the implant due to control of spinal column flexion buckling. Sham operation did likewise, apparently by posterior scar tissue tethering. The percent contribution of the implant construct to instrumented segment stiffness was significantly less at 6 months without further change from 6 to 12 months; 14% and 22% for 4.76 and 6.35 mm rod constructs, respectively. Spinal column as well as posterior column stiffness after fusion was independent of rod size at 6 months and increased at 12 months in only the 4.76 mm rod group. Bypassed L4 vertebral body stiffness decreased significantly at 6 months, was not rod size dependent and changed little between 6 and 12 months. Bypassed disk stiffness responded in a biphasic manner, apparently increasing at 6 months with significant decrease from 6 to 12 months. Adjacent disk compression stiffness progressively decreased over time independent of rod size, also decreasing after sham operation. Conclusions: Both rod sizes were associated with 100% fusion and produced similar changes in bypassed bone and disks, and adjacent disks. There was delayed fusion stress shielding by 6.35 mm rod constructs.
引用
收藏
页码:549 / 559
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] SCREW ARTHRODESIS OF LUMBAR SPINE
    EVANS, MJ
    KIRWAN, EOG
    JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1977, 59 (04): : 498 - 498
  • [2] Functional Limitations Due to Stiffness as a Collateral Impact of Instrumented Arthrodesis of the Lumbar Spine
    Hart, Robert A.
    Marshall, Lynn M.
    Hiratzka, Shannon L.
    Kane, Marie S.
    Volpi, Joseph
    Hiratzka, Jayme R.
    SPINE, 2014, 39 (24) : E1468 - E1474
  • [3] Effect of an interspinous implant on loads in the lumbar spine
    Rohlmann, A
    Zander, T
    Burra, NK
    Bergmann, G
    BIOMEDIZINISCHE TECHNIK, 2005, 50 (10): : 343 - 347
  • [4] Restoring lumbar spine stiffness using an interspinous implant in an ovine model of instability
    Szpalski, Marek
    Gunzburg, Robert
    Colloca, Christopher J.
    Kosmopoulos, Victor
    Hegazy, Mostafa Afifi
    Freeman, Brian J.C.
    Fabeck, Laurent
    Clinical Biomechanics, 2016, 33 : 85 - 91
  • [5] Restoring lumbar spine stiffness using an interspinous implant in an ovine model of instability
    Szpalski, Marek
    Gunzburg, Robert
    Colloca, Christopher J.
    Kosmopoulos, Victor
    Hegazy, Mostafa Afifi
    Freeman, Brian J. C.
    Fabeck, Laurent
    CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2016, 33 : 85 - 91
  • [6] THE EFFECTS OF IMPLANT STIFFNESS ON THE BYPASSED BONE-MINERAL DENSITY AND FACET FUSION STIFFNESS OF THE CANINE SPINE
    CRAVEN, TG
    CARSON, WL
    ASHER, MA
    ROBINSON, RG
    SPINE, 1994, 19 (15) : 1664 - 1673
  • [7] Optimal stiffness of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation implant for the lumbar spine
    Rohlmann, Antonius
    Zander, Thomas
    Bergmann, Georg
    Boustani, Hadi N.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2012, 21 (04) : 666 - 673
  • [8] Optimal stiffness of a pedicle-screw-based motion preservation implant for the lumbar spine
    Antonius Rohlmann
    Thomas Zander
    Georg Bergmann
    Hadi N. Boustani
    European Spine Journal, 2012, 21 : 666 - 673
  • [9] Circumferential arthrodesis using PEEK cages at the lumbar spine
    Rousseau, Marc-Antoine
    Lazennec, Jean-Yves
    Saillant, Gerard
    JOURNAL OF SPINAL DISORDERS & TECHNIQUES, 2007, 20 (04): : 278 - 281
  • [10] Trapdoor Technique for Intertransverse Process Arthrodesis of the Lumbar Spine
    Leung, Yee L.
    Burr, Steven A.
    TECHNIQUES IN ORTHOPAEDICS, 2010, 25 (04) : 237 - 239