A Structural Equation Model for Polygamy Review in Islamic Education of Parepare City

被引:0
|
作者
Ambar, Iriani [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Muhammadiyah Parepare, Parepare, Indonesia
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (AMCA 2018) | 2018年 / 231卷
关键词
SEM; Polygamy; Law of Marriage;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
C91 [社会学];
学科分类号
030301 ; 1204 ;
摘要
This study aims to identify the factors underlying the structural equation model of polygamy review in Islamic education and the most influential impact on the structural equation model of polygamy my review in the Islamic education of Parepare City, South Sulawesi Province. There were eight (8) participants in this study who were selected using purposive techniques based on the the characteristics of the subjects through clustering of four (4) subdistricts, namely Ujung, Soreang, Bacukiki and Bacukiki Barat. This study used mixed method by combining between qualitative and quantitative methods with multi-case study approach through Structural Equation Model (SEM). The results of this study indicate that the issue of polygamy frequently leads to polemics and raises a variety of opinions among the public. The image of a polygamous family certainly invites controversy and depicts the heartbreaking story behind the marriage. Polygamy may result in wives lose their sense of trust in their husbands, increase suspicion and jealousy, children experience emotional suffering for mutual love, lack of attention, hatred and even economic downturn. Thus, the decision to do or not to do polygamy is mostly based on the idea that whether polygamy bringsmore advantages or disadvantages regardless of the permissibility by law and religious law.
引用
收藏
页码:672 / 674
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Education: a comparative structural equation modeling study
    Camgoz-Akdag, Hatice
    Zaim, Selim
    CYPRUS INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH (CY-ICER-2012), 2012, 47 : 874 - 880
  • [2] Modeling Model Misspecification in Structural Equation Models
    Robitzsch, Alexander
    STATS, 2023, 6 (02): : 689 - 705
  • [3] Structural equation modelling: Adjudging model fit
    Barrett, Paul
    PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2007, 42 (05) : 815 - 824
  • [4] A Structural Equation Model for Analyzing Underground Mine Safety
    Li Zhongcai
    Chen Zhangliang
    Sun Yufeng
    PROGRESS IN SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, VOL. VIII, PTS A AND B, 2010, 8 : 1380 - 1383
  • [5] A structural equation model to evaluate students' learning and satisfaction
    Erenler, Hale H. Turhangil
    COMPUTER APPLICATIONS IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION, 2020, 28 (02) : 254 - 267
  • [6] A Nonlinear Dynamic Latent Class Structural Equation Model
    Kelava, Augustin
    Brandt, Holger
    STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING-A MULTIDISCIPLINARY JOURNAL, 2019, 26 (04) : 509 - 528
  • [7] Structural equation modeling in pediatric psychology: Overview and review of applications
    Nelson, Timothy D.
    Aylward, Brandon S.
    Steele, Ric G.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 33 (07) : 679 - 687
  • [8] IT Vendor Selection Model by Using Structural Equation Model & Analytical Hierarchy Process
    Maitra, Sarit
    Dominic, P. D. D.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE SIXTH GLOBAL CONFERENCE ON POWER CONTROL AND OPTIMIZATION, 2012, 1499 : 287 - 293
  • [9] A Structural Equation Modeling Evaluation of the General Model of Instructional Communication
    Katt, James A.
    McCroskey, James C.
    Sivo, Stephen A.
    Richmond, Virginia P.
    Valencic, Kristin M.
    COMMUNICATION QUARTERLY, 2009, 57 (03) : 239 - 258
  • [10] Distributed computing in multi-group structural equation model
    Tong, Hengqing
    Li, Ziqing
    Tong, QiaoLing
    DCABES 2006 PROCEEDINGS, VOLS 1 AND 2, 2006, : 144 - 148