Environment and host species shape the skin microbiome of captive neotropical bats

被引:47
作者
Lemieux-Labonte, Virginie [1 ]
Tromas, Nicolas [1 ]
Shapiro, B. Jesse [1 ]
Lapointe, Francois-Joseph [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Sci Biol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
来源
PEERJ | 2016年 / 4卷
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Bat skin microbiome; Habitat-microbiome interaction; Host-microbiome interaction; PSEUDOGYMNOASCUS-DESTRUCTANS; PHYLOGENETIC DIVERSITY; COMMUNITY; GEOMYCES; ECOLOGY; CHIROPTERA; DYNAMICS; PATTERNS; HISTORY; DEFENSE;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.2430
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background. A wide range of microorganisms inhabit animal skin. This microbial community (microbiome) plays an important role in host defense against pathogens and disease. Bats (Chiroptera: Mammalia) are an ecologically and evolutionarily diversified group with a relatively unexplored skin microbiome. The bat skin microbiome could play a role in disease resistance, for example, to white nose syndrome (WNS), an infection which has been devastating North American bat populations. However, fundamental knowledge of the bat skin microbiome is needed before understanding its role in health and disease resistance. Captive neotropical frugivorous bats Artibeus jamaicensis and Carolliaperspicillata provide a simple controlled system in which to characterize the factors shaping the bat microbiome. Here, we aimed to determine the relative importance of habitat and host species on the bat skin microbiome. Methods. We performed high-throughput 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the skin microbiome of two different bat species living in captivity in two different habitats. In the first habitat, A. jamaicensis and C. perspicillata lived together, while the second habitat contained only A. jamaicensis. Results. We found that both habitat and host species shape the composition and diversity of the skin microbiome, with habitat having the strongest influence. Cohabitating A. jamaicensis and C. perspicillata shared more similar skin microbiomes than members of the same species (A. jamaicensis) across two habitats. Discussion. These results suggest that in captivity, the skin microbial community is homogenised by the shared environments and individual proximities of bats living together in the same habitat, at the expense of the innate host species factors. The predominant influence of habitat suggests that environmental microorganisms or pathogens might colonize bat skin. We also propose that bat populations could differ in pathogen susceptibility depending on their immediate environment and habitat.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] ALBERTANO P., 2012, Ecology of Cyanobacteria II: Their Diversity in Space and Time, P317, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-007-3855-3_11
  • [2] PERMANOVA, ANOSIM, and the Mantel test in the face of heterogeneous dispersions: What null hypothesis are you testing?
    Anderson, Marti J.
    Walsh, Daniel C. I.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS, 2013, 83 (04) : 557 - 574
  • [3] Distance-based tests for homogeneity of multivariate dispersions
    Anderson, MJ
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 2006, 62 (01) : 245 - 253
  • [4] Anderson MJ, 2001, AUSTRAL ECOL, V26, P32, DOI 10.1111/j.1442-9993.2001.01070.pp.x
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2001, MAMMAL SPECIES, DOI DOI 10.2307/0.662.1
  • [6] ARITA HT, 1995, SOUTHWEST NAT, V40, P29
  • [7] Barker GM, 2002, BIOL J LINN SOC, V76, P165, DOI 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2002.tb02081.x
  • [8] The effect of captivity on the cutaneous bacterial community of the critically endangered Panamanian golden frog (Atelopus zeteki)
    Becker, Matthew H.
    Richards-Zawacki, Corinne L.
    Gratwicke, Brian
    Belden, Lisa K.
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2014, 176 : 199 - 206
  • [9] Belden LK, 2007, FRONT ECOL ENVIRON, V5, P533
  • [10] The identification of 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol as an antifungal metabolite produced by cutaneous bacteria of the salamander Plethodon cinereus
    Brucker, Robert M.
    Baylor, Cambria M.
    Walters, Robert L.
    Lauer, Antje
    Harris, Reid N.
    Minbiole, Kevin P. C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY, 2008, 34 (01) : 39 - 43