Using a semantic diagram to structure a collaborative problem solving process in the classroom

被引:9
作者
Cai, Huiying [1 ]
Lin, Lin [2 ]
Gu, Xiaoqing [1 ]
机构
[1] East China Normal Univ, Dept Educ Informat Technol, 3663 Zhangshan Rd North, Shanghai 200062, Peoples R China
[2] Univ North Texas, Dept Learning Technol, Coll Informat, UNT Discovery Pk,G150 G189,3940 North Elm St, Denton, TX 76207 USA
来源
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT | 2016年 / 64卷 / 06期
关键词
Collaborative problem solving; Semantic diagram; Classroom research; The role of teacher; KNOWLEDGE; FRAMEWORK; ARGUMENTATION; GUIDANCE; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1007/s11423-016-9445-6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study provides an in-depth look into the implementation process of visualization-based tools for structuring collaborative problem solving (CPS) in the classroom. A visualization-based learning platform-the semantic diagram for structuring CPS in a real classroom was designed and implemented. Metafora, the preliminary vehicle of the semantic diagram, was integrated into the Food and Nutrition CPS curriculum in a fifth-grade science classroom in east China. Data of a teacher's and her students' activities from the CPS classroom were analyzed to understand how Metafora could be integrated into the CPS instructional process, what roles Metafora and the teacher played in the CPS project, and to what extent Metafora might have affected the teacher's instruction and the students' learning activities in the CPS classroom. Results showed that the semantic diagram could be integrated into the CPS classroom adaptively and flexibly, and that it was important to keep a balance between the role of the semantic diagram and the role of the teacher. Implications for semantic diagram design and implementation for structuring CPS in the classroom, as well as future work about the semantic diagram will be discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:1207 / 1225
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1936, THESIS U LONDON
[3]  
Aronson Elliot, 1978, The Jigsaw Classroom
[4]   Promoting reflective interactions in a CSCL environment [J].
Baker, M ;
Lund, K .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED LEARNING, 1997, 13 (03) :175-192
[5]  
Care E., 2014, Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, V9, P367
[6]  
Chen M.-H., 2013, To See the World and a Grain of Sand: Learning across Levels of Space, Time, and Scale: CSCL 2013 Conference Proceedings Volume, V1, P81, DOI [10.22318/cscl2013.1.81, DOI 10.1016/J.EVALPROGPLAN.2022.102061]
[7]   The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving [J].
Cho, KL ;
Jonassen, DH .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2002, 50 (03) :5-22
[8]  
Clark D., 2013, International Handbook of Research on Conceptual Change, V2nd, P520
[9]   Design research: Theoretical and methodological issues [J].
Collins, A ;
Joseph, D ;
Bielaczyc, K .
JOURNAL OF THE LEARNING SCIENCES, 2004, 13 (01) :15-42
[10]   Talk and learning in classroom science [J].
Dawes, L .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2004, 26 (06) :677-695