Induction Therapies in Live Donor Kidney Transplantation on Tacrolimus and Mycophenolate With or Without Steroid Maintenance

被引:47
作者
Tanriover, Bekir [1 ]
Zhang, Song [2 ]
MacConmara, Malcolm [3 ]
Gao, Ang [2 ]
Sandikci, Burhaneddin [4 ]
Ayvaci, Mehmet U. S. [5 ]
Mete, Mutlu [6 ]
Tsapepas, Demetra [7 ]
Rajora, Nilum [1 ]
Mohan, Prince [8 ]
Lakhia, Ronak [1 ]
Lu, Christopher Y. [1 ]
Vazquez, Miguel [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Div Nephrol, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[2] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Dept Clin Sci, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[3] Univ Texas SW Med Ctr Dallas, Ctr Abdominal Organ Transplantat, Dallas, TX 75390 USA
[4] Univ Chicago, Booth Sch Business, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
[5] Univ Texas Dallas, Informat Syst, Dallas, TX 75230 USA
[6] Texas A&M Univ, Comp Sci & Informat Syst, Commerce, TX USA
[7] New York Presbyterian Hosp, Div Pharm, New York, NY USA
[8] Med Univ S Carolina, Div Nephrol, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
来源
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY | 2015年 / 10卷 / 06期
关键词
HIGHLY SENSITIZED PATIENTS; RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; LONG-TERM; PROPENSITY SCORE; DOUBLE-BLIND; RECIPIENTS; WITHDRAWAL; MULTICENTER; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION; ANTIBODIES;
D O I
10.2215/CJN.08710814
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background and objectives Induction therapy with IL-2 receptor antagonist (IL2-RA) is recommended as a first line agent in living donor renal transplantation (LRT). However, use of IL2-RA remains controversial in LRT with tacrolimus (TAC)/mycophenolic acid (MPA) with or without steroids. Design, setting, participants, & measurements The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry was studied for patients receiving LRT from 2000 to 2012 maintained on TAC/MPA at discharge (n=36,153) to compare effectiveness of IL2-RA to other induction options. The cohort was initially divided into two groups based on use of maintenance steroid at time of hospital discharge: steroid (n=25,996) versus no-steroid (n=10,157). Each group was further stratified into three categories according to commonly used antibody induction approach: IL2-RA, rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG), and no-induction in the steroid group versus IL2-RA, r-ATG and alemtuzumab in the no-steroid group. The main outcomes were the risk of acute rejection at 1 year and overall allograft failure (graft failure or death) post-transplantation through the end of follow-up. Propensity score-weighted regression analysis was used to minimize selection bias due to non-random assignment of induction therapies. Results Multivariable logistic and Cox analysis adjusted for propensity score showed that outcomes in the steroid group were similar between no-induction (odds ratio [OR] 0.96; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.86 to 1.08 for acute rejection; and hazard ratio [HR], 0.99; 95% CI, 0.90 to 1.08 for overall allograft failure) and IL2-RA categories. In the no-steroid group, odds of acute rejection with r-ATG (OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.90) and alemtuzumab (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.42 to 0.67) were lower; however, overall allograft failure risk was higher with alemtuzumab (HR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.56) but not with r-ATG (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.97 to 1.45), compared with IL2-RA induction. Conclusions Compared with no-induction therapy, IL2-RA induction was not associated with better outcomes when TAC/MPA/steroids were used in LRT recipients. r-ATG appears to be an acceptable and possibly the. preferred induction alternative for IL2-RA in steroid-avoidance protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:1041 / 1049
页数:9
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Ahsan N, 1999, TRANSPLANTATION, V68, P1865
[2]   Limited dose monoclonal IL-2R antibody induction protocol after primary kidney transplantation [J].
Ahsan, N ;
Holman, MJ ;
Jarowenko, MV ;
Razzaque, MS ;
Yang, HC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 2 (06) :568-573
[3]   Clinical Relevance of Pretransplant Donor-Specific HLA Antibodies Detected by Single-Antigen Flow-Beads [J].
Amico, Patrizia ;
Hoenger, Gideon ;
Mayr, Michael ;
Steiger, Juerg ;
Hopfer, Helmut ;
Schaub, Stefan .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2009, 87 (11) :1681-1688
[4]  
[Anonymous], AM J TRANSPLANT
[5]   KDOQI US Commentary on the 2009 KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for the Care of Kidney Transplant Recipients [J].
Bia, Margaret ;
Adey, Deborah B. ;
Bloom, Roy D. ;
Chan, Laurence ;
Kulkarni, Sanjay ;
Tomlanovich, Steven .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2010, 56 (02) :189-218
[6]   Pretransplant risk assessment in renal allograft recipients using virtual crossmatching [J].
Bielmann, D. ;
Hoenger, G. ;
Lutz, D. ;
Mihatsch, M. J. ;
Steiger, J. ;
Schaub, S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2007, 7 (03) :626-632
[7]   A Virtual Crossmatch Protocol Significantly Increases Access of Highly Sensitized Patients to Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation [J].
Bingaman, Adam W. ;
Murphey, Cathi L. ;
Palma-Vargas, Juan ;
Wright, Francis .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2008, 86 (12) :1864-1868
[8]   Long-term graft survival is improved in cadaveric renal retransplantation by flow cytometric crossmatching [J].
Bryan, CF ;
Baier, KA ;
Nelson, PW ;
Luger, AM ;
Martinez, J ;
Pierce, GE ;
Ross, G ;
Shield, CF ;
Warady, BA ;
Aeder, MI ;
Helling, TS ;
Muruve, N .
TRANSPLANTATION, 1998, 66 (12) :1827-1832
[9]   Calculated PRA: Initial Results Show Benefits for Sensitized Patients and a Reduction in Positive Crossmatches [J].
Cecka, J. M. ;
Kucheryavaya, A. Y. ;
Reinsmoen, N. L. ;
Leffell, M. S. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2011, 11 (04) :719-724
[10]   Randomized Trial of Three Induction Antibodies in Kidney Transplantation: Long-Term Results [J].
Ciancio, Gaetano ;
Gaynor, Jeffrey J. ;
Guerra, Giselle ;
Sageshima, Junichiro ;
Chen, Linda ;
Mattiazzi, Adela ;
Roth, David ;
Kupin, Warren ;
Tueros, Lissett ;
Flores, Sandra ;
Hanson, Lois ;
Vianna, Rodrigo ;
Burke, George W., III .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 97 (11) :1128-1138