Farmers' Willingness to Pay for Improved Agricultural Technologies: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Tanzania

被引:25
作者
Shee, Apurba [1 ]
Azzarri, Carlo [2 ]
Haile, Beliyou [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Greenwich, Nat Resources Inst, Chatham ME4 4TB, Kent, England
[2] Int Food Policy Res Inst, 1201 Eye St NW, Washington, DC 20005 USA
关键词
sustainable intensification; willingness to pay; double-bounded contingent valuation; risk aversion; Tanzania; CONTINGENT VALUATION; DICHOTOMOUS CHOICE; RISK-AVERSION; CHEAP TALK; PREFERENCES; ADOPTION; ATTITUDES; AFRICA; TIME; AUCTIONS;
D O I
10.3390/su12010216
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Initiatives on the sustainable intensification of agriculture have introduced improved technologies tailored to farmers' local conditions by trial demonstration with free provision of improved seeds and fertilizers. It is not clear, though, whether smallholder farmers would be willing to pay for these technologies, and what factors determine their informed demand. Using a contingent valuation experiment, combined with information at baseline among 400 households in Northern Tanzania, this study measured farmers' willingness to pay (WTP) for hybrid maize seed and local inorganic fertilizer. Farmers' WTP was estimated using a dichotomous contingent valuation with follow-up model. Results showed that the average WTP was 61% higher for hybrid maize seed, and 15% lower for inorganic fertilizer, than their respective average local market prices during the reference period, suggesting that farmers were willing to pay a premium for hybrid maize seed, while they did not seem to be interested in fertilizer purchase at current market price. Moreover, since improved access to extension services was found to positively affect farmers' WTP, strengthening extension services could be a suitable policy intervention to increase farmers' demand for improved technologies. On the other hand, farmers' risk aversion was negatively correlated with WTP for both technologies. This result suggests that encouraging risk reduction options, such as agricultural insurance, could be a useful policy strategy for boosting farmers' demand for improved agricultural technologies.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]   MARKET FOR LEMONS - QUALITY UNCERTAINTY AND MARKET MECHANISM [J].
AKERLOF, GA .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1970, 84 (03) :488-500
[2]   Eliciting risk and time preferences [J].
Andersen, Steffen ;
Harrison, Glenn W. ;
Lau, Morten I. ;
Rutstrom, E. Elisabet .
ECONOMETRICA, 2008, 76 (03) :583-618
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, Tanzania Public Expenditure Review: National Agricultural Input Voucher Scheme (NAIVS)
[4]   ECONOMETRIC ESTIMATION OF PRODUCERS RISK ATTITUDES [J].
ANTLE, JM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1987, 69 (03) :509-522
[5]   The structural transformation of African agriculture and rural spaces: introduction to a special section† [J].
Barrett, Christopher B. ;
Christian, Paul ;
Shiferaw, Bekele A. .
AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 48 :5-10
[6]   On the Structural Transformation of Rural Africa [J].
Barrett, Christopher B. ;
Christiaensen, Luc ;
Sheahan, Megan ;
Shimeles, Abebe .
JOURNAL OF AFRICAN ECONOMIES, 2017, 26 :11-35
[7]   ATTITUDES TOWARD RISK - THEORETICAL IMPLICATIONS OF AN EXPERIMENT IN RURAL INDIA [J].
BINSWANGER, HP .
ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1981, 91 (364) :867-890
[8]   ATTITUDES TOWARD RISK - EXPERIMENTAL-MEASUREMENT IN RURAL INDIA [J].
BINSWANGER, HP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 1980, 62 (03) :395-407
[9]   LEMON TECHNOLOGIES AND ADOPTION: MEASUREMENT, THEORY, AND EVIDENCE FROM AGRICULTURAL MARKETS IN UGANDA [J].
Bold, Tessa ;
Kaizzi, Kayuki C. ;
Svensson, Jakob ;
Yanagizawa-Drott, David .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2017, 132 (03) :1055-1100
[10]   STARTING POINT BIAS IN CONTINGENT VALUATION BIDDING GAMES [J].
BOYLE, KJ ;
BISHOP, RC ;
WELSH, MP .
LAND ECONOMICS, 1985, 61 (02) :188-194