An accuracy-improved flood risk and ecological risk assessment in an interconnected river-lake system based on a copula-coupled hydrodynamic risk assessment model

被引:9
|
作者
Yang, Rui [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Shiqiang [2 ]
Gao, Xueping [1 ]
Wu, Xiufeng [2 ]
Zhang, Chen [1 ]
Wang, Chaoyue [1 ]
Dai, Jiangyu [2 ]
Zhang, Yu [2 ]
Zhao, Yuhang [2 ]
机构
[1] Tianjin Univ, State Key Lab Hydraul Engn Simulat & Safety, Tianjin 300072, Peoples R China
[2] Nanjing Hydraul Res Inst, State Key Lab Hydrol Water Resources & Hydraul En, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
关键词
Risk assessment; Water diversion; Interconnected river-lake system; Copula; Hydrodynamics; WATER DIVERSION PROJECT; CLIMATE-CHANGE; RESERVOIR; BASIN; OPERATION; FRAMEWORK; SECURITY; DRAINAGE; IMPACTS; EVENTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.127042
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Understanding flood event-related risk in an interconnected river-lake system (IRLS) is a prerequisite for developing water resource management strategies and enhancing disaster resilience. Previous flood event-related risk assessments either hardly consider the context in which water diversion encounters flood events or hardly consider the physical process, stochastic analysis and multivariate interactions of flood event characteristics simultaneously, thereby resulting in a less reliable assessment of flood event-related risk. To resolve this limitation, a copula-coupled hydrodynamic risk assessment model (CHRAM) is proposed to characterize the physical, multivariate, and stochastic nature of risk, improving the accuracy of risk assessment. In this study, CHRAM is capable of accurately quantifying flood event-related risks (i.e., flood risk and ecological risk) of the Nansi Lake Basin in the flood season under the operation of the eastern route of the South-to-North Water Diversion Project in China. Our findings revealed that the total flood volume (R-sum) and duration (T-d) of flood events were significantly sensitive characteristic indexes for flood risk and ecological risk. In addition, the security domains of flood risk (R-sum < 35 mm and T-d < 23 d) and ecological risk (R-sum < 50 mm and T-d < 27 d) were determined based on the analysis of the relationship between sensitive characteristic indexes and risk indicators. The results also showed that the impact of T-d on flood risk, ecological risk and flood-ecological combined risk was 3-14 times greater than the impact of R-sum. The occurrence probability of flood-ecological combined risk was smaller than that of flood risk but greater than that of ecological risk, with the corresponding maximum risk probabilities of 11.2%, 36.5%, and 4.7%, respectively. This study extends the current knowledge about risk assessment in IRLS and is beneficial to instruct the management of projects for similar systems.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A conceptual model for flood disaster risk assessment based on agent-based modeling
    Bin Linghu
    Chen, Feng
    Guo, Xiaotian
    Li, Wenbo
    2013 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCES AND APPLICATIONS (CSA), 2013, : 369 - 373
  • [42] Ecological risk assessment and ecological security pattern optimization in the middle reaches of the Yellow River based on ERI plus MCR model
    Yang, Lian'an
    Li, Yali
    Jia, Lujing
    Ji, Yongfan
    Hu, Guigui
    JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL SCIENCES, 2023, 33 (04) : 823 - 844
  • [43] Receptor model-based source apportionment and ecological risk assessment of metals in sediment of river Ganga, India
    Das, Basanta Kumar
    Kumar, Vikas
    Chakraborty, Lokenath
    Swain, Himanshu Sekhar
    Ramteke, Mitesh Hiradas
    Saha, Ajoy
    Das, Akash
    Bhor, Manisha
    Upadhyay, Aurobinda
    Jana, Chayna
    Manna, Ranjan Kumar
    Samanta, Srikanta
    Tiwari, Nitish Kumar
    Ray, Archisman
    Roy, Shreya
    Bayen, Supriti
    Das Gupta, Subhadeep
    MARINE POLLUTION BULLETIN, 2023, 195
  • [44] Coupling a land surface model with a hydrodynamic model for regional flood risk assessment due to climate change: Application to the Susquehanna River near Harrisburg, Pennsylvania
    Modi, Parthkumar A.
    Czuba, Jonathan A.
    Easton, Zachary M.
    JOURNAL OF FLOOD RISK MANAGEMENT, 2022, 15 (01):
  • [45] Aquatic plants-based risk model for assessment of ecological safety of rivers
    Hachol, Justyna
    Bondar-Nowakowska, Elzbieta
    HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2016, 22 (04): : 1065 - 1077
  • [46] Spatial distribution, source analysis, and ecological risk assessment of PBDEs in river sediment around Taihu Lake, China
    Yuan, Xuyin
    Wang, Yimin
    Tang, Li
    Zhou, Huihua
    Han, Nian
    Zhu, Hai
    Uchimiya, Minori
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2020, 192 (05)
  • [47] Towards the sustainable development of water security: A new copula-based risk assessment system
    Wang, Zihang
    Liu, Xiaomin
    Liu, Tingxi
    Wang, Wenjuan
    Liu, Jingtao
    ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2024, 166
  • [48] Risk Assessment of Coal Mine Flood Disasters Based on Projection Pursuit Clustering Model
    Sun, Zuo
    Liu, Yingjie
    Qi, Qingjie
    Liu, Wengang
    Li, Dan
    Chai, Jiamei
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 14 (18)
  • [49] Flood risk assessment of Shenzhen City based on TELEMAC-2D model
    Li G.
    Liu J.
    Water Resources Protection, 2022, 38 (05) : 58 - 64
  • [50] A Risk Assessment Model of Flood Based on Information Diffusion Method and BP Neural Network
    Chen, Junfei
    Jin, Qiongji
    Wang, Huimin
    Zhao, Shufang
    PRZEGLAD ELEKTROTECHNICZNY, 2012, 88 (9B): : 33 - 36