No increased prostate cancer incidence after negative transrectal ultrasound guided multiple biopsies in men with increased prostate specific antigen and/or abnormal digital rectal examination

被引:5
|
作者
Bill-Axelson, A [1 ]
Holmberg, L
Norlén, B
Busch, C
Norberg, M
机构
[1] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Dept Urol, SE-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
[2] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Dept Pathol, S-75185 Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Dept Radiol, Uppsala, Sweden
[4] Univ Uppsala Hosp, Reg Oncol Ctr, Uppsala, Sweden
关键词
prostate; prostatic neoplasms; ultrasonography; biopsy;
D O I
10.1097/01.ju.0000087325.57314.5c
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We investigated the incidence of prostate cancer after negative transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided multiple biopsies. Our secondary aim was to calculate the sensitivity of the extended protocol used. Materials and Methods: A cohort of 547 men with elevated prostate specific antigen and/or abnormal digital rectal examination but with results negative for prostate cancer on a mean of 9 TRUS guided biopsies was followed through record linkage to the national cancer Registry. The observed number of prostate cancers was compared with the expected number during the same calendar period in an age matched male population to determine the standardized incidence ratio. The sensitivity of TRUS with multiple biopsies after 5 years of followup was calculated. Relative survival was estimated if there was an excess death rate due to undiagnosed prostate cancer. Results: We found 11 men diagnosed with prostate cancer. The expected number in the age standardized male population was 15, resulting in a standardized incidence ratio of 0.8 (95% CI 0.4 to 1.2). Five-year sensitivity of the extended protocol of TRUS guided biopsies was 95.2% (95% CI 93.5 to 96.4) and relative survival was more than 100%, indicating a selection of men deemed candidates for curative treatment. Conclusions: Men with clinical suspicion of prostate cancer who are examined by an extended protocol of TRUS guided biopsies negative for cancer do not have an increased incidence of prostate cancer within 6 years compared with an age matched male population. Five-year sensitivity of this protocol was high.
引用
收藏
页码:1180 / 1183
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Prostate Biopsy in Men With Repeat Negative Biopsies and Increased Prostate Specific Antigen
    Hambrock, Thomas
    Somford, Diederik M.
    Hoeks, Caroline
    Bouwense, Stefan A. W.
    Huisman, Henkjan
    Yakar, Derya
    van Oort, Inge M.
    Witjes, J. Alfred
    Futterer, Jurgen J.
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (02) : 520 - 527
  • [2] Utility of Digital Rectal Examination, Serum Prostate Specific Antigen, and Transrectal Ultrasound in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Developing Country Perspective
    Kash, Deep Par
    Lal, Murli
    Hashmi, Altaf Hussain
    Mubarak, Muhammed
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (07) : 3087 - 3091
  • [3] Contemporary outcomes in the detection of prostate cancer using transrectal ultrasound-guided 12-core biopsy in Singaporean men with elevated prostate specific antigen and/or abnormal digital rectal examination
    Lee, Alvin
    Chia, Sing Joo
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2015, 2 (04) : 187 - 193
  • [4] The Efficacy of Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy Versus Transperineal Template Biopsy of the Prostate in Diagnosing Prostate Cancer in Men with Previous Negative Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
    Nafie, Shady
    Wanis, Michael
    Khan, Masood
    UROLOGY JOURNAL, 2017, 14 (02) : 3008 - 3012
  • [5] Prostate cancer detection in black and white men with abnormal digital rectal examination and prostate specific antigen less than 4 ng./ml.
    Fowler, JE
    Bigler, SA
    Farabaugh, PB
    Wilson, SS
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (06) : 1961 - 1963
  • [6] Transurethral biopsy of the prostate for persistently elevated or increasing prostate specific antigen following multiple negative transrectal biopsies
    Rovner, ES
    Schanne, FJ
    Malkowicz, SB
    Wein, AJ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1997, 158 (01) : 138 - 141
  • [7] Prostate specific antigen density versus prostate specific antigen slope as predictors of prostate cancer in men with initially negative prostatic biopsies
    Keetch, DW
    McMurtry, JM
    Smith, DS
    Andriole, GL
    Catalona, WJ
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 156 (02) : 428 - 431
  • [8] PROSTATE-CANCER - COMPARISON OF DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION AND TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND FOR SCREENING
    PALKEN, M
    COBB, OE
    SIMONS, CE
    WARREN, BH
    ALDAPE, HC
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1991, 145 (01) : 86 - 92
  • [9] Incidence and Pathological Features of Prostate Cancer Detected on Transperineal Template Guided Mapping Biopsy After Negative Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Biopsy
    Bittner, Nathan
    Merrick, Gregory S.
    Butler, Wayne M.
    Bennett, Abbey
    Galbreath, Robert W.
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2013, 190 (02) : 509 - 514
  • [10] Prospective Evaluation of Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided In-bore Prostate Biopsy versus Systematic Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Prostate Biopsy in Biopsy Naive Men with Elevated Prostate Specific Antigen
    Quentin, Michael
    Blondin, Dirk
    Arsov, Christian
    Schimmoeller, Lars
    Hiester, Andreas
    Godehardt, Erhard
    Albers, Peter
    Antoch, Gerald
    Rabenalt, Robert
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2014, 192 (05) : 1374 - 1379