Impact of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy on fetal growth and relationship with maternal nutritional status

被引:44
作者
Coupaye, Muriel [1 ]
Legardeur, Helene [2 ,3 ]
Sami, Ouidad [1 ]
Calabrese, Daniela [3 ,4 ]
Mandelbrot, Laurent [2 ,3 ]
Ledoux, Severine [1 ]
机构
[1] Hop Louis Mourier, AP HP, Ctr Integre Nord Francilien Prise Charge Obesite, Serv Explorat Fonct,Paris Diderot,Sorbonne Paris, Colombes, France
[2] Hop Louis Mourier, AP HP, Serv Gynecol Obstet, Colombes, France
[3] Univ Paris Diderot, Sorbonne Paris Cite, Paris, France
[4] Hop Louis Mourier, AP HP, Ctr Integre Nord Francilien Prise Charge ObesiteS, Serv Chirurg, Colombes, France
关键词
Bariatric surgery; Gastric bypass; Sleeve gastrectomy; Pregnancy; Fetal growth; Nutritional status; BARIATRIC SURGERY; PERINATAL OUTCOMES; NEONATAL OUTCOMES; PREGNANT-WOMEN; BIRTH-WEIGHT; IRON STATUS; RECOMMENDATIONS; OBESITY; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.soard.2018.07.014
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is a lack of evidence on whether sleeve gastrectomy (SG), which induces fewer nutritional deficiencies than Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), also affects fetal growth (FG). Objectives: To compare neonatal outcomes after RYGB and SG and to assess the impact of maternal nutritional alterations on FG after both procedures. Setting: University Hospital, France. Methods: Women with singleton pregnancies who had at least 1 nutritional evaluation in our institution between 2004 and 2017 were included. FG was assessed with birth weight (BW) and BW-Z score (adjusted for sex and term), and maternal nutritional deficiencies were defined according to standard and pregnancy-specific norms. Results: During the study period 123 pregnancies were included, 77 after RYGB and 46 after SG. Weight loss was higher after RYGB than after SG (45.6 +/- 12.4 versus 39.5 +/- 13.7 kg, P = .02), but mean weight before pregnancy and weight gain during pregnancy were similar. Mean BW (3026 +/- 677 versus 3162 +/- 712 g), mean BW Z-score and incidence of small for gestational age (24% versus 19%) were not significantly different after RYGB and SG. Mean number of nutritional deficiencies during the second trimester was similar (2.2 +/- 1.5 versus 2.1 +/- 1.2 with specific norms), but the affected parameters differed between procedures. Urinary urea (R = .285, P = .04) was positively correlated to BW Z -score after both procedures. In contrast, serum iron parameters were negatively associated to BW Z -score. Conclusion: FG restriction occurs after both SG and RYGB. FG after bariatric surgery is positively associated with protein supply and negatively correlated with maternal iron status. (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Bariatric Surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:1488 / 1494
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] Pregnancy and Laboratory Studies A Reference Table for Clinicians
    Abbassi-Ghanavati, Mina
    Greer, Laura G.
    Cunningham, F. Gary
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 114 (06) : 1326 - 1331
  • [2] Maternal and neonatal outcomes for pregnancies before and after gastric bypass surgery
    Adams, T. D.
    Hammoud, A. O.
    Davidson, L. E.
    Laferrere, B.
    Fraser, A.
    Stanford, J. B.
    Hashibe, M.
    Greenwood, J. L. J.
    Kim, J.
    Taylor, D.
    Watson, A. J.
    Smith, K. R.
    McKinlay, R.
    Simper, S. C.
    Smith, S. C.
    Hunt, S. C.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 2015, 39 (04) : 686 - 694
  • [3] Maternal iron status in early pregnancy and birth outcomes: insights from the Baby's Vascular health and Iron in Pregnancy study
    Alwan, Nisreen A.
    Cade, Janet E.
    McArdle, Harry J.
    Greenwood, Darren C.
    Hayes, Helen E.
    Simpson, Nigel A. B.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION, 2015, 113 (12) : 1985 - 1992
  • [4] Critical issues in setting micronutrient recommendations for pregnant women: an insight
    Berti, Cristiana
    Decsi, Tamas
    Dykes, Fiona
    Hermoso, Maria
    Koletzko, Berthold
    Massari, Maddalena
    Moreno, Luis A.
    Serra-Majem, Luis
    Cetin, Irene
    [J]. MATERNAL AND CHILD NUTRITION, 2010, 6 : 5 - 22
  • [5] Practical Recommendations of the Obesity Management Task Force of the European Association for the Study of Obesity for the Post-Bariatric Surgery Medical Management
    Busetto, Luca
    Dicker, Dror
    Azran, Carmil
    Batterham, Rachel L.
    Farpour-Lambert, Nathalie
    Fried, Martin
    Hjelmesaeth, Joran
    Kinzl, Johann
    Leitner, Deborah R.
    Makaronidis, Janine M.
    Schindler, Karin
    Toplak, Hermann
    Yumuk, Volkan
    [J]. OBESITY FACTS, 2017, 10 (06) : 597 - 632
  • [6] Using Z-scores to compare biometry data obtained during prenatal ultrasound screening by midwives and physicians
    Capmas, P.
    Salomon, L. J.
    Picone, O.
    Fuchs, F.
    Frydman, R.
    Senat, M. V.
    [J]. PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS, 2010, 30 (01) : 40 - 42
  • [7] Newborn regional body composition is influenced by maternal obesity, gestational weight gain and the birthweight standard score
    Carlsen, E. M.
    Renault, K. M.
    Norgaard, K.
    Nilas, L.
    Jensen, J. E. B.
    Hyldstrup, L.
    Michaelsen, K. F.
    Cortes, D.
    Pryds, O.
    [J]. ACTA PAEDIATRICA, 2014, 103 (09) : 939 - 945
  • [8] Perinatal Outcomes and the Influence of Maternal Characteristics After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Surgery
    Chagas, Cristiane
    Saunders, Claudia
    Pereira, Silvia
    Silva, Jacqueline
    Saboya, Carlos
    Ramalho, Andrea
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WOMENS HEALTH, 2017, 26 (01) : 71 - 75
  • [9] Vitamin A status and its relationship with serum zinc concentrations among pregnant women who have previously undergone Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
    Chagas, Cristiane
    Saunders, Claudia
    Pereira, Silvia
    Silva, Jacqueline
    Saboya, Carlos
    Ramalho, Andrea
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2016, 133 (01) : 94 - 97
  • [10] Impact of bariatric surgery on fetal growth restriction: experience of a perinatal and bariatric surgery center
    Chevrot, Audrey
    Kayem, Gilles
    Coupaye, Muriel
    Lesage, Ninon
    Msika, Simon
    Mandelbrot, Laurent
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (05) : 655.e1 - 655.e7