Air quality modeling for accountability research: Operational, dynamic, and diagnostic evaluation

被引:27
|
作者
Henneman, Lucas R. F. [1 ]
Liu, Cong [2 ]
Hu, Yongtao [1 ]
Mulholland, James A. [1 ]
Russell, Armistead G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Civil & Environm Engn, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[2] Southeast Univ, Sch Energy & Environm, Nanjing, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
关键词
Air pollution accountability; Model evaluation; Chemical transport modeling; SECONDARY POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS; DIRECT SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; SOUTHEASTERN UNITED-STATES; PARTICULATE MATTER; SOURCE APPORTIONMENT; EMISSION REDUCTIONS; ERROR APPORTIONMENT; SPATIAL VARIATIONS; SURFACE OZONE; URBAN AREAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.07.049
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Photochemical grid models play a central role in air quality regulatory frameworks, including in air pollution accountability research, which seeks to demonstrate the extent to which regulations causally impacted emissions, air quality, and public health. There is a need, however, to develop and demonstrate appropriate practices for model application and evaluation in an accountability framework. We employ a combination of traditional and novel evaluation techniques to assess four years (2001-02, 2011-12) of simulated pollutant concentrations across a decade of major emissions reductions using the Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) model. We have grouped our assessments in three categories: Operational evaluation investigates how well CMAQ captures absolute concentrations; dynamic evaluation investigates how well CMAQ captures changes in concentrations across the decade of changing emissions; diagnostic evaluation investigates how CMAQ attributes variability in concentrations and sensitivities to emissions between meteorology and emissions, and how well this attribution compares to empirical statistical models. In this application, CMAQ captures O-3 and PM2.5 concentrations and change over the decade in the Eastern United States similarly to past CMAQ applications and in line with model evaluation guidance; however, some PM2.5 species-EC, OC, and sulfate in particular-exhibit high biases in various months. CMAQ-simulated PM2.5 has a high bias in winter months and low bias in the summer, mainly due to a high bias in OC during the cold months and low bias in OC and sulfate during the summer. Simulated O-3 and PM2.5 changes across the decade have normalized mean bias of less than 2.5% and 17%, respectively. Detailed comparisons suggest biased EC emissions, negative wintertime SOi-sensitivities to mobile source emissions, and incomplete capture of OC chemistry in the summer and winter. Photochemical grid model simulated 03 and PM2.5 responses to emissions and meteorologically across the decade match results from receptor-based, statistical regression models. PM2.5 sensitivities to mobile source emissions in the summertime have decreased substantially, but wintertime mobile sensitives remain largely unchanged because decreases in negative SOi- sensitivities match decreases in positive sensitivities from other constituents. Similarly, NOx emissions have led to decreased summertime O-3 and increased wintertime O-3 because of opposite sensitivities. Overall, results show that emissions reductions improved air quality across the domain and remain a viable option for improving future air quality. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 565
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Air quality changes after Hong Kong shipping emission policy: An accountability study
    Mason, Tonya G.
    Chan, King Pan
    Schooling, C. Mary
    Sun, Shengzhi
    Yang, Aimin
    Yang, Yang
    Barratt, Benjamin
    Tian, Linwei
    CHEMOSPHERE, 2019, 226 : 616 - 624
  • [32] Evaluation of the meteorological forcing used for the Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII) air quality simulations
    Vautard, Robert
    Moran, Michael D.
    Solazzo, Efisio
    Gilliam, Robert C.
    Matthias, Volker
    Bianconi, Roberto
    Chemel, Charles
    Ferreira, Joana
    Geyer, Beate
    Hansen, Ayoe B.
    Jericevic, Amela
    Prank, Marje
    Segers, Arjo
    Silver, Jeremy D.
    Werhahn, Johannes
    Wolke, Ralf
    Rao, S. T.
    Galmarini, Stefano
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2012, 53 : 15 - 37
  • [33] Research and application of a hybrid model based on dynamic fuzzy synthetic evaluation for establishing air quality forecasting and early warning system: A case study in China
    Xu, Yunzhen
    Du, Pei
    Wang, Jianzhou
    ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTION, 2017, 223 : 435 - 448
  • [34] Operational evaluation of the RLINE dispersion model for studies of trafficrelated air pollutants
    Milando, Chad W.
    Batterman, Stuart A.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 182 : 213 - 224
  • [35] Evaluation and Application of an Online Coupled Modeling System to Assess the Interaction between Urban Vegetation and Air Quality
    Yang, Jianbo
    Liu, Hongnian
    Sun, Jianning
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2018, 18 (03) : 693 - 710
  • [36] Fine Scale Modeling of Agricultural Air Quality over the Southeastern United States Using Two Air Quality Models. Part I. Application and Evaluation
    Zhang, Yang
    Olsen, Kristen M.
    Wang, Kai
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2013, 13 (04) : 1231 - 1252
  • [37] Air Quality Modeling with the Use of Regression Neural Networks
    Hoffman, Szymon
    Filak, Mariusz
    Jasinski, Rafal
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (24)
  • [38] Use of Simulated and Observed Meteorology for Air Quality Modeling and Source Ranking for an Industrial Region
    Kumar, Awkash
    Dikshit, Anil Kumar
    Patil, Rashmi S.
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 13 (08)
  • [39] Air quality accountability: Developing long-term daily time series of pollutant changes and uncertainties in Atlanta, Georgia resulting from the 1990 Clean Air Act Amendments
    Henneman, Lucas R. F.
    Liu, Cong
    Chang, Howard
    Mulholland, James
    Tolbert, Paige
    Russell, Armistead
    ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2019, 123 : 522 - 534
  • [40] Air Quality Model Evaluation International Initiative (AQMEII): A Two-Continent Effort for the Evaluation of Regional Air Quality Models
    Rao, S. T.
    Mathur, Rohit
    Hogrefe, Christian
    Solazzo, Efisio
    Galmarini, Stefano
    Steyn, Douw G.
    AIR POLLUTION MODELING AND ITS APPLICATION XXII, 2014, : 455 - 462