Two-dimensional ultrasound: can it replace computed tomography in liver volume assessment?

被引:7
作者
Farghaly, Shimaa [1 ]
Makboul, Marwa [1 ]
Shehata, Mahmoud Refaat [2 ]
机构
[1] Assiut Univ, Fac Med, Radiodiag Dept, Assiut, Egypt
[2] Assiut Univ, Fac Med, Gen Surg Dept, Assiut, Egypt
关键词
Liver; Volumetry; Two-dimensional ultrasound; Semi-automated technique; Multi-slice computed tomography; CT; SEGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1186/s43055-019-0073-0
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background: Liver volume estimation is considered as an integral part in preoperative evaluation in patients undergoing liver transplantation; computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are considered the gold standard methods for liver volume estimation, and both are reliable and valid in determination of liver volume via manual and semi-automated methods. Reliable and accurate set of three simple measurement planes using two-dimensional ultrasound for volumetric assessment of liver was determined, and predictive equation using these three simple measurements was performed, which is simple to perform and easy to calculate, in order to evaluate liver volume and validate these measurements against CT images. Our aim in this study was to evaluate the efficacy and validity of two-dimensional ultrasound in liver volume estimation compared to CT volumetry as a gold standard. Results: A strong linear positive correlation with no statistical significant difference was found between 2D US and semi-automated CT volumetric, and result was r = 0.7402 and p > 0.05, with an average liver volume of 1572.10 (+/- 326.43) cm(3) and 1559.30 (+/- 381.02) cm(3) respectively. No statistically significant difference was found also between the two modalities in different age groups and different sexes. Conclusion: Simple linear two-dimensional ultrasound could be considered an efficient, accurate, and trustable tool for liver volume measurement in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   AUTOMATIC SEGMENTATION OF LIVER STRUCTURE IN CT IMAGES [J].
BAE, KT ;
GIGER, ML ;
CHEN, CT ;
KAHN, CE .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1993, 20 (01) :71-78
[2]  
Childs Jessie T, 2014, Australas J Ultrasound Med, V17, P113, DOI 10.1002/j.2205-0140.2014.tb00026.x
[3]   The development of a practical and uncomplicated predictive equation to determine liver volume from simple linear ultrasound measurements of the liver [J].
Childs, Jessie T. ;
Thoirs, Kerry A. ;
Esterman, Adrian J. .
RADIOGRAPHY, 2016, 22 (02) :E125-E130
[4]   Liver volumetry: Is imaging reliable? Personal experience and review of the literature [J].
D'Onofrio, Mirko ;
De Robertis, Riccardo ;
Demozzi, Emanuele ;
Crosara, Stefano ;
Canestrini, Stefano ;
Mucelli, Roberto Pozzi .
WORLD JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 6 (04) :62-71
[5]   Non-invasive imaging - Contraindications to magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Dill, T. .
HEART, 2008, 94 (07) :943-948
[6]   Automatic liver segmentation technique for three-dimensional visualisation of CT data [J].
Gao, LM ;
Heath, DG ;
Kuszyk, BS ;
Fishman, EK .
RADIOLOGY, 1996, 201 (02) :359-364
[7]   ULTRASONIC DETERMINATION OF HEPATOMEGALY [J].
GOSINK, BB ;
LEYMASTER, CE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 1981, 9 (01) :37-41
[8]  
Jessie T, 2016, RADIOGRAPHY, V22
[9]   Sonographic preoperative assessment of liver volume before major liver resection [J].
Kitajima, K. ;
Taboury, J. ;
Boleslawski, E. ;
Savier, E. ;
Vaillant, J. -C. ;
Hannoun, L. .
GASTROENTEROLOGIE CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 2008, 32 (04) :382-389
[10]   Factors affecting liver size - A sonographic survey of 2080 subjects [J].
Kratzer, W ;
Fritz, V ;
Mason, RA ;
Haenle, MM ;
Kaechele, V .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (11) :1155-1161