Age-related decline in bone mass measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and quantitative ultrasound in a population-based sample of both sexes - Identification of useful ultrasound thresholds for osteoporosis screening

被引:28
作者
Gudmundsdottir, SL
Indridason, OS
Franzson, L
Sigurdsson, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Landspitali Univ Hosp, Dept Endocrinol & Metab, IS-108 Reykjavik, Iceland
[2] Landspitali Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Chem, IS-108 Reykjavik, Iceland
关键词
bone mineral density; osteoporosis; screening; ultrasound;
D O I
10.1385/JCD:8:1:080
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) can be used as a screening tool for low bone mineral density (BMD), but clinical guidelines have not been set. The aim of this population-based, cross-sectional study was to compare age-related changes in bone mass measured by QUS (Lunar, Achilles Plus) and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in a random sample of 1630 individuals (1041 females, 589 males) 30-85 yr of age. Individuals with DXA T-scores <=-2.5 at the femoral neck or total hip were identified and receiver operating curves (ROCs) were used to calculate cutoff points for QUS. Sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistics were calculated. Age-related bone loss was significantly larger with QUS than DXA at all sites in women. For men, the curves were similar for QUS and DXA in the hip. Similar correlations were found between QUS and DXA in different age groups of both sexes (0.36-0.60). For women aged 50-65 yr, a QUS T-score >-1.0 was found to be the most applicable for identifying normal BMD. In the 70-85 yr age group, a T-score <-2.5 for women and a T-score <-0.5 for men seemed reasonable cutoffs for identifying normal BMD (sensitivity: 86-93%; specificity: 28-44%; discordance: 33-73%). Calcaneal QUS cannot be used for the diagnosis of osteoporosis according to WHO criteria, but it can be of use to exclude osteoporosis in 30-40% of our cases.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 86
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   Comparison of heel ultrasound and finger DXA to central DXA in the detection of osteoporosis - Implications for patient management [J].
Bachman, DM ;
Crewson, PE ;
Lewis, RS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2002, 5 (02) :131-141
[2]   Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women - A prospective study [J].
Bauer, DC ;
Gluer, CC ;
Cauley, JA ;
Vogt, TM ;
Ensrud, KE ;
Genant, HK ;
Black, DM .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 157 (06) :629-634
[3]   Quantitative ultrasound and mortality: A prospective study [J].
Bauer, DC ;
Palermo, L ;
Black, D ;
Cauley, JA .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 13 (08) :606-612
[4]   The role of quantitative ultrasound in predicting osteoporosis defined by dual X-ray absorptiometry [J].
Çetin, A ;
Ertürk, H ;
Çeliker, R ;
Sivri, A ;
Hasçelik, Z .
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 20 (02) :55-59
[5]   RISK-FACTORS FOR HIP FRACTURE IN WHITE WOMEN [J].
CUMMINGS, SR ;
NEVITT, MC ;
BROWNER, WS ;
STONE, K ;
FOX, KM ;
ENSRUD, KE ;
CAULEY, JC ;
BLACK, D ;
VOGT, TM .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1995, 332 (12) :767-773
[6]   Imaging ultrasonometry of the calcaneus: Optimum T-score thresholds for the identification of osteoporotic subjects [J].
Damilakis, J ;
Perisinakis, K ;
Gourtsoyiannis, N .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 68 (04) :219-224
[7]   Evaluation of calcaneal quantitative ultrasound in a primary care setting as a screening tool for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women [J].
Díez-Pérez, A ;
Marín, F ;
Vila, J ;
Abizanda, M ;
Cervera, A ;
Carbonell, C ;
Alcolea, RM ;
Cama, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2003, 6 (03) :237-245
[8]   Dual X-ray absorptiometry of hip, heel ultrasound, and densitometry of fingers can discriminate male patients with hip fracture from control subjects -: A comparison of four different methods [J].
Ekman, A ;
Michaëlsson, K ;
Petrén-Mallmin, M ;
Ljunghall, S ;
Mallmin, H .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 2002, 5 (01) :79-85
[9]   DXA of the hip and heel ultrasound but not densitometry of the fingers can discriminate female hip fracture patients from controls:: A comparison between four different methods [J].
Ekman, A ;
Michaëlsson, K ;
Petrén-Mallmin, M ;
Ljunghall, S ;
Mallmin, H .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 12 (03) :185-191
[10]   Discordance in patient classification using T-scores [J].
Faulkner, KG ;
von Stetten, E ;
Miller, P .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 1999, 2 (03) :343-350