Automated Calculation of Water-equivalent Diameter (DW) Based on AAPM Task Group 220

被引:65
作者
Anam, Choirul [1 ,2 ]
Haryanto, Freddy [2 ]
Widita, Rena [2 ]
Arif, Idam [2 ]
Dougherty, Geoff [3 ]
机构
[1] Diponegoro Univ, Fac Math & Sci, Dept Phys, Jl Prof Soedarto, Semarang 50275, Cent Java, Indonesia
[2] Bandung Inst Technol, Dept Phys, Fac Math & Sci, Bandung, Indonesia
[3] CSUCI, Camarillo, CA USA
关键词
water-equivalent diameter (D-W); size-specific dose estimates (SSDE); volume CT dose index (CTDIVOL); patient dose; CONE-BEAM CT; ATTENUATION-BASED ESTIMATION; TOMOGRAPHY DOSE INDEX; PATIENT SIZE; LENGTH PRODUCT; VALIDATION; DOSIMETRY; PURPOSE; IMAGES;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v17i4.6171
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study is to accurately and effectively automate the calculation of the water-equivalent diameter (D-W) from 3D CT images for estimating the size-specific dose. D-W is the metric that characterizes the patient size and attenuation. In this study, D-W was calculated for standard CTDI phantoms and patient images. Two types of phantom were used, one representing the head with a diameter of 16 cm and the other representing the body with a diameter of 32 cm. Images of 63 patients were also taken, 32 who had undergone a CT head examination and 31 who had undergone a CT thorax examination. There are three main parts to our algorithm for automated D-W calculation. The first part is to read 3D images and convert the CT data into Hounsfield units (HU). The second part is to find the contour of the phantoms or patients automatically. And the third part is to automate the calculation of D-W based on the automated contouring for every slice (D-W,D-all). The results of this study show that the automated calculation of D-W and the manual calculation are in good agreement for phantoms and patients. The differences between the automated calculation of D-W and the manual calculation are less than 0.5%. The results of this study also show that the estimating of D-W,D-all using D-W,D-n=1 (central slice along longitudinal axis) produces percentage differences of -0.92% +/- 3.37% and 6.75% +/- 1.92%, and estimating D-W,D-all using D-W,D-n=9 produces percentage differences of 0.23% +/- 0.16% and 0.87% +/- 0.36%, for thorax and head examinations, respectively. From this study, the percentage differences between normalized size-specific dose estimate for every slice (nSSDEall) and nSSDEn=1 are 0.74% +/- 2.82% and -4.35% +/- 1.18% for thorax and head examinations, respectively; between nSSDEall and nSSDEn=9 are 0.00% +/- 0.46% and -0.60% +/- 0.24% for thorax and head examinations, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 333
页数:14
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
AAPM, 2010, 111 AAPM
[2]  
AAPM Task Group 204, 2011, 204 AAPM TASK GROUP
[3]  
Anam C., 2015, ADV SCI ENG MED, V7, P892, DOI DOI 10.1166/ASEM.2015.1780
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2008, AAPM REP, DOI DOI 10.37206/97
[5]   CT dosimetry: comparison of measurement techniques and devices [J].
Bauhs, John A. ;
Vrieze, Thomas J. ;
Primak, Andrew N. ;
Bruesewitz, Michael R. ;
McCollough, Cynthia H. .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2008, 28 (01) :245-253
[6]   The trouble with CTDI100 [J].
Boone, John M. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (04) :1364-1371
[7]   Attenuation-based size metric for estimating organ dose to patients undergoing tube current modulated CT exams [J].
Bostani, Maryam ;
McMillan, Kyle ;
Lu, Peiyun ;
Kim, Hyun J. ;
Cagnon, Chris H. ;
DeMarco, John J. ;
McNitt-Gray, Michael F. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (02) :958-968
[8]   Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT [J].
Brenner, DJ ;
Elliston, CD ;
Hall, EJ ;
Berdon, WE .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2001, 176 (02) :289-296
[9]   Size-specific Dose Estimation for CT: How Should It Be Used and What Does It Mean? [J].
Brink, James A. ;
Morin, Richard L. .
RADIOLOGY, 2012, 265 (03) :666-668
[10]   Automated size-specific CT dose monitoring program: Assessing variability in CT dose [J].
Christianson, Olav ;
Li, Xiang ;
Frush, Donald ;
Samei, Ehsan .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2012, 39 (11) :7131-7139