Value of Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram in clinical decision making for sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer

被引:22
作者
van den Hoven, I. [1 ]
Kuijt, G. P. [1 ]
Voogd, A. C. [2 ,3 ]
van Beek, M. W. P. M. [4 ]
Roumen, R. M. H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Maxima Med Ctr, Dept Surg, NL-5500 MB Veldhoven, Netherlands
[2] Eindhoven Canc Registry, Eindhoven, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ Med Ctr, Sch GROW, Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Lab Pathol & Med Microbiol, Eindhoven, Netherlands
关键词
MSKCC NOMOGRAM; BIOPSY; METASTASES; LIKELIHOOD; INVOLVEMENT; VALIDATION; PREDICTION; MODELS; LIMITATIONS; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.7186
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The aim of this study was to determine the value of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) nomogram for individual decision making in a Dutch cohort of women with breast cancer with a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) but at low risk of additional nodal metastases. Methods: Data were collected on 168 patients with a positive SLN who underwent completion axillary lymph node dissection. The predicted probability of non-SLN metastases was calculated for each patient, using the MSKCC nomogram. Specificity and false-negative rates were calculated for subgroups with a predicted risk of no more than 5, 10 or 15 per cent. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was constructed and the area under the curve (AUC) calculated. Results: The discrimination of the MSKCC nomogram, measured by the AUC, was 0.68. For low predicted probability cut-off values of no more than 5, 10 and 15 per cent, the false-negative rates were 20, 14 and 19 per cent, and the specificities were 4, 27 and 32 per cent, respectively. The low-risk category (5 per cent or less) consisted of only 3.0 per cent of the study population. Conclusion: The performance of the MSKCC nomogram was insufficient to make it a useful tool for individual decision making in this cohort of women with SLN-positive breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1653 / 1658
页数:6
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   New models and online calculator for predicting non-sentinel lymph node status in sentinel lymph node positive breast cancer patients [J].
Kohrt, Holbrook E. ;
Olshen, Richard A. ;
Bermas, Honnie R. ;
Goodson, William H. ;
Wood, Douglas J. ;
Henry, Solomon ;
Rouse, Robert V. ;
Bailey, Lisa ;
Philben, Vicki J. ;
Dirbas, Frederick M. ;
Dunn, Jocelyn J. ;
Johnson, Denise L. ;
Wapnir, Irene L. ;
Carlson, Robert W. ;
Stockdale, Frank E. ;
Hansen, Nora M. ;
Jeffrey, Stefanie S. .
BMC CANCER, 2008, 8 (1)
[12]   Validation of a breast cancer nomogram for predicting nonsentinel lymph node metastases after a positive sentinel node biopsy [J].
Lambert, LA ;
Ayers, GD ;
Hwang, RF ;
Hunt, KK ;
Ross, MI ;
Kuerer, HM ;
Singletary, SE ;
Babiera, GV ;
Ames, FC ;
Feig, B ;
Lucci, A ;
Krishnamurthy, S ;
Meric-Bernstam, F .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (03) :310-320
[13]  
Nationaal Borstkanker Overleg Nederland (NABON), 2008, RICHTL MAMM
[14]   A model for predicting non-sentinel lymph node metastatic disease when the sentinel lymph node is positive [J].
Pal, A. ;
Provenzano, E. ;
Duffy, S. W. ;
Pinderl, S. E. ;
Purushotham, A. D. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2008, 95 (03) :302-309
[15]   A declining rate of completion axillary dissection in sentinel lymph node-positive breast cancer patients is associated with the use of a multivariate nomogram [J].
Park, Julia ;
Fey, Jane V. ;
Naik, Arpana M. ;
Borgen, Patrick I. ;
Van Zee, Kimberly J. ;
Cody, Hiram S., III .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 245 (03) :462-468
[16]   Comparison of two models for the prediction of nonsentinel node metastases in breast cancer [J].
Ponzone, Riccardo ;
Maggiorotto, Furio ;
Mariani, Luca ;
Jacomuzzi, Maria Elena ;
Magistris, Alessandra ;
Mininanni, Paola ;
Biglia, Nicoletta ;
Sismondi, Piero .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2007, 193 (06) :686-692
[17]   In search of the true sentinel node by different injection techniques in breast cancer patients [J].
Roumen, RMH ;
Geuskens, LM ;
Valkenburg, JGH .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 25 (04) :347-351
[18]   Proceedings of the Consensus Conference on the Role of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Carcinoma of the Breast, April 19-22, 2001, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania [J].
Schwartz, GF ;
Giuliano, AE ;
Veronesi, U .
CANCER, 2002, 94 (10) :2542-2551
[19]   Can the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center nomogram predict the likelihood of nonsentinel lymph node metastases in breast cancer patients in The Netherlands? [J].
Smidt, ML ;
Kuster, DM ;
van der Wilt, GJ ;
Thunnissen, FB ;
Van Zee, KJ ;
Strobbe, LJA .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2005, 12 (12) :1066-1072
[20]   Evaluation of a breast cancer nomogram for prediction of non-sentinel lymph node positivity [J].
Soni, NK ;
Carmalt, HL ;
Gillett, DJ ;
Spillane, AJ .
EJSO, 2005, 31 (09) :958-964