Invertebrates associated with aquatic plants bought from aquarium stores in Canada and New Zealand

被引:17
作者
Duggan, Ian C. [1 ]
Champion, Paul D. [2 ]
MacIsaac, Hugh J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waikato, Sch Sci, Environm Res Inst, Private Bag 3105, Hamilton, New Zealand
[2] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res Ltd NIWA, POB 11-115, Hamilton 3200, New Zealand
[3] Univ Windsor, Great Lakes Inst Environm Res, Windsor, ON N9B 3P4, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Incidental fauna; Hitchhikers; Biological invasions; Ornamental plants; Aquarium trade; Copepoda; 1ST RECORD; INVASION; WATER; TRADE; PATHWAY; FISH; ESTABLISHMENT; RISK;
D O I
10.1007/s10530-018-1766-4
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Invertebrate species carried incidentally (i.e., hitchhikers') in the aquarium trade have gained increasing attention in recent years, but factors affecting the movement of species from stores to homes are poorly understood. We aimed to determine how macrophytes bought from stores act as vectors for transport of non-indigenous invertebrate species. We tested whether incidental invertebrate faunas carried on macrophytes vary internationally by comparing the New Zealand and Canadian trades, and if macrophyte species with different morphologies carry different risks. We recorded a large variety of invertebrate species associated with Vallisneria spp., Sword plants (Echinodorus spp.) and Elodea canadensis bought from stores, including species non-indigenous to both countries. Community composition of incidental fauna differed significantly between New Zealand (primarily domestically cultivated) and Canadian (primarily imported) bought macrophytes. Differences in composition between different macrophyte species were only statistically significant between wild-collected E. canadensis and the cultured species in New Zealand. Behaviours observed in stores, such as the amount of time macrophytes were removed from water before being placed in plastic bags for transport, did not affect the abundances or richness of incidental invertebrates transported, and thus did not appear to be effective in reducing invasion risk. We therefore recommend chemical treatment for removal of invertebrates from macrophytes at or pre-border, and from tanks containing plants at culture facilities and in stores. Such management will reduce the probability of introduction of hitchhikers to home aquaria, from which risk of release to natural waters is greatest.
引用
收藏
页码:3167 / 3178
页数:12
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [21] Ejsmont-Karabin J, 2011, POL J ECOL, V59, P201
  • [22] Macroinvertebrates select complex macrophytes independently of their body size and fish predation risk in a Pampean stream
    Ferreiro, Nicolas
    Feijoo, Claudia
    Giorgi, Adonis
    Rosso, Juan
    [J]. HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2014, 740 (01) : 191 - 205
  • [23] FISH G R, 1971, New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, V5, P66
  • [24] Lake Superior: an invasion coldspot?
    Grigorovich, IA
    Korniushin, AV
    Gray, DK
    Duggan, IC
    Colautti, RI
    MacIsaac, HJ
    [J]. HYDROBIOLOGIA, 2003, 499 (1-3) : 191 - 210
  • [25] Establishment of two invasive crustaceans (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) in the nearshore sands of Lake Michigan
    Horvath, TG
    Whitman, RL
    Last, LL
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF FISHERIES AND AQUATIC SCIENCES, 2001, 58 (07) : 1261 - 1264
  • [26] A new species of Schizopera (Copepoda: Harpacticoida) from Japan, its phylogeny based on the mtCOI gene and comments on the genus Schizoperopsis
    Karanovic, Tomislav
    Kim, Kichoon
    Grygier, Mark J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NATURAL HISTORY, 2015, 49 (41-42) : 2493 - 2526
  • [27] Kobayashi Tsuyoshi, 2007, Australian Zoologist, V34, P181
  • [28] Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders
    Kolar, CS
    Lodge, DM
    [J]. TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2001, 16 (04) : 199 - 204
  • [29] Lang K., 1948, MONOGRAPHIE HARPACTI, V2
  • [30] Macrophyte architecture affects the abundance and diversity of littoral microfauna
    Lucena-Moya, Paloma
    Duggan, Ian C.
    [J]. AQUATIC ECOLOGY, 2011, 45 (02) : 279 - 287