Impact of housing nursery pigs according to body weight on the onset of feed intake, aggressive behavior, and growth performance

被引:6
作者
Faccin, J. E. G. [1 ]
Laskoski, F. [1 ]
Quirino, M. [1 ]
Goncalves, M. A. D. [2 ]
Mallmann, A. L. [1 ]
Orlando, U. A. D. [2 ]
Mellagi, A. P. G. [1 ]
Bernardi, M. L. [3 ]
Ulguim, R. R. [1 ]
Bortolozzo, F. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Vet Sch, Vet Med Dept, BR-91540000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
[2] Genus PIC, 100 Bluegrass Commons Blvd,Ste 2200, Hendersonville, TN 37075 USA
[3] Univ Fed Rio Grande do Sul, Agron Sch, Anim Sci Dept, BR-91540000 Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
关键词
Growth rate; Nursery pigs; Behavior; Housing; Bodyweight variability; SLAUGHTER;
D O I
10.1007/s11250-019-02096-6
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Housing nursery pigs according to body weight is an observed common practice in production systems and, supposedly, improves growth performance and reduces body weight (BW) variation. This 42-day study evaluated the effects of housing nursery pigs according to BW on performance, onset of feed intake, and aggressive behavior. A total of 504 pigs were ranked by BW at weaning and categorized into three groups of 168 pigs each: light, medium, and heavy. Pigs were randomly distributed to unsorted pens (Unsorted) containing 6 pigs of each weight group and sorted pens with 18 pigs from just one group per pen (Sorted). From weaning to day 3, pigs were fed a diet containing 1% iron oxide dye and rectal swabs presenting red coloration were evaluated to assess feed intake onset. Eight pens were video recorded to evaluate aggressive behavior. Sorted-Heavy pigs delayed the onset of feed intake (P <= 0.011) and presented more aggressive behaviors than Sorted-Light and Sorted-Medium pigs (P <= 0.036). In Unsorted, onset of feed intake showed no differences between weight categories. Also, no differences were observed for aggressive behavior between Sorted and Unsorted. Final BW showed no differences between Sorted and Unsorted pigs. The within-pen weight coefficient variation (CV) was slightly different (P = 0.042) between Sorted and Unsorted pigs (13.3 and 15.6%, respectively), at the end of the study. Thus, sorting nursery pigs by BW did not improve growth performance and also, induce a lag of post-weaning feed intake onset and increased fights in Heavy pigs.
引用
收藏
页码:1073 / 1079
页数:7
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   SOCIAL RANK AND FEEDING-BEHAVIOR OF GROUP-HOUSED SOWS FED COMPETITIVELY OR AD-LIBITUM [J].
BROUNS, F ;
EDWARDS, SA .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 1994, 39 (3-4) :225-235
[2]  
Bruininx EMAM, 2001, J ANIM SCI, V79, P301
[3]  
Brumm MC, 2002, J ANIM SCI, V80, P1166
[4]   Regrouping of pigs by body weight at weaning does not affect growth performance, carcass quality or uniformity at slaughter of heavy weight pigs [J].
Camara, Lourdes ;
Diaz Berrocoso, Julio ;
Fuentetaja, Alfonso ;
Jose Lopez-Bote, Clemente ;
De Blas, Carlos ;
Mateos, Gonzalo G. .
ANIMAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2016, 87 (01) :134-142
[5]   Individual aggressiveness measured in a resident-intruder test predicts the persistence of aggressive behaviour and weight gain of young pigs after mixing [J].
D'Eath, RB .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2002, 77 (04) :267-283
[6]   Analysing dominance relationships by sociometric methods - a plea for a more standardised and precise approach in farm animals [J].
Langbein, J ;
Puppe, B .
APPLIED ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR SCIENCE, 2004, 87 (3-4) :293-315
[7]  
Laskoski F, 2019, J SWINE HEALTH PROD, V27, P12
[8]  
Madec E, 2003, WEANING THE PIG: CONCEPTS AND CONSEQUENCES, P337
[9]  
O'Quinn PR, 2001, J SWINE HEALTH PROD, V9, P11
[10]  
Patience JF, 2004, ADVANCES IN PORK PRODUCTION, VOL 15, P257