Fostering collaborative approaches to gender equality interventions in higher education and research: the case of transnational and multi-institutional communities of practice

被引:22
作者
Thomson, Aleksandra [1 ]
Palmen, Rachel [2 ]
Reidl, Sybille [3 ]
Barnard, Sarah [1 ]
Beranek, Sarah [3 ]
Dainty, Andrew R. J. [4 ]
Hassan, Tarek M. [4 ]
机构
[1] Loughborough Univ, Sch Business & Econ, Loughborough, Leics, England
[2] Univ Oberta Catalunya, Internet Interdisciplinary Inst, Barcelona, Spain
[3] JOANNEUM Res, Ctr Econ & Innovat Res POLICIES, Graz, Austria
[4] Loughborough Univ, Sch Architecture Bldg & Civil Engn, Loughborough, Leics, England
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
Communities of practice; gender equality initiatives; gender equality plans; higher education; research and innovation; collaborative approaches; institutional change; RESISTANCE;
D O I
10.1080/09589236.2021.1935804
中图分类号
D58 [社会生活与社会问题]; C913 [社会生活与社会问题];
学科分类号
摘要
Higher education and research and innovation in Europe continue to suffer from an indefensible waste of female talent and gender inequality. The European Commission recommends that these organizations adopt gender equality plans (GEPs) and other initiatives for institutional change. However, the levels of readiness, expertise, and experience with such interventions are wide-ranging across institutions and member states, thus collaborative approaches might be particularly valuable. Drawing on the experiences of transnational and multi-institutional communities of practice (CoPs) for gender equality (GE), we illuminate how the CoP approach supported change agents, who leveraged CoP membership to respond to challenges in promoting GE initiatives. Being part of collaborative, co-designed CoPs for learning, knowledge sharing, and institutional change provided external support to the change agents' activism and allowed them to build legitimacy around GE work. CoP members leveraged this support through learning opportunities, knowledge transfer, sharing practice, political support, and solidarity from the CoP stakeholders. Findings also show that when CoPs were transnational, multi-institutional, and interdisciplinary, their heterogeneity did raise some challenges in relation to the divergence of members' contexts and geopolitical idiosyncrasies and that this should be considered when designing CoPs which transcend national and institutional boundaries.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 54
页数:19
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Communities of practice in higher education: contradictory narratives of a university-wide curriculum reform [J].
Annala, Johanna ;
Makinen, Marita .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2017, 42 (11) :1941-1957
[2]   CREATING READINESS FOR ORGANIZATIONAL-CHANGE [J].
ARMENAKIS, AA ;
HARRIS, SG ;
MOSSHOLDER, KW .
HUMAN RELATIONS, 1993, 46 (06) :681-703
[3]  
Barnard S., 2016, GENDERTIME INT C PAR
[4]   Institutional Isomorphism Revisited: Convergence and Divergence in Institutional Change [J].
Beckert, Jens .
SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY, 2010, 28 (02) :150-166
[5]   Recalibrating Management: Feminist Activism to Achieve Equality in an Evolving University [J].
Bendl, Regine ;
Danowitz, Mary Ann ;
Schmidt, Angelika .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2014, 25 (02) :320-334
[6]   United we adapt: communities of practice to face the CoronaVirus crisis in higher education [J].
Bolisani, Ettore ;
Fedeli, Monica ;
Bierema, Laura ;
De Marchi, Valentina .
KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT RESEARCH & PRACTICE, 2021, 19 (04) :454-458
[7]   From cooperation to competition: an interaction-based contingency theory of communities of practice [J].
Britt, Brian C. .
JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2021, 25 (06) :1594-1618
[8]   The Utility of Template Analysis in Qualitative Psychology Research [J].
Brooks, Joanna ;
McCluskey, Serena ;
Turley, Emma ;
King, Nigel .
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 12 (02) :202-222
[9]   Gender equity programmes in academic medicine: a realist evaluation approach to Athena SWAN processes [J].
Caffrey, Louise ;
Wyatt, David ;
Fudge, Nina ;
Mattingley, Helena ;
Williamson, Catherine ;
McKevitt, Christopher .
BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (09)
[10]  
Cambridge D., 2005, COMMUNITY PRACTICE D