A critical review of published research literature reviews on nursing and healthcare ageism

被引:24
|
作者
Wilson, Donna M. [1 ]
Nam, Mavis A. [2 ]
Murphy, Jill [3 ]
Victorino, Joao P. [4 ]
Gondim, Ellen C. [4 ]
Low, Gail [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Fac Nursing, Edmonton, AB, Canada
[2] Univ Ghana, Sch Nursing, Legon, Ghana
[3] Univ Limerick, Dept Nursing & Midwifery, Limerick, Ireland
[4] Univ Sao Paulo, Ribeirao Preto Coll Nursing, Ribeirao Preto, Brazil
关键词
ageism; age discrimination; nursing; healthcare; review of literature reviews; meta-synthesis; evidence; OLDER-PEOPLE; NURSES ATTITUDES; ADULTS; DISCRIMINATION; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1111/jocn.13803
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
Aims and objectivesTo establish how common and impactful nursing and healthcare ageism is and whether proven interventions or prevention methods exist. BackgroundAgeism has been a concern since 1969 when it was first introduced as a concept for social reform. As ageism has been linked to lower quality health services and reduced health care access, it is imperative that healthcare and nursing ageism is prevented or identified and reduced or eliminated. DesignA qualitative narrative review of published research literature reviews using a scoping design to map all published reviews was undertaken. The EBSCO Discovery Service (providing access to articles in 271 databases, including MEDLINE and CINAHL) and Directory of Open Access Journals (providing access to over 9,000 open access journals) were used to find review articles. Using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, and limited by English language and peer-review publications, 12 eligible reviews were identified and information from them was systematically identified, assessed and synthesised. ResultsThe 12 reviews did not provide clear and convincing information to determine how common and impactful nursing or healthcare ageism is, nor what can best be done to prevent or address it. Although each review had value since research literature was collected and discussed on nursing or healthcare ageism, the array of literature search and analysis methods, and diversity in conclusions reached about the evidence is highly problematic. ConclusionResearch literature reviews offering a more balanced perspective and demonstrating greater care in finding and using quality evidence are needed. Relevance to clinical practiceAt this point in time, there is no clear understanding of how widespread and impactful nursing or healthcare ageism is, and what can best be done to prevent or address it. Nurses need to be aware that ageism may be common and impactful, and guard against it.
引用
收藏
页码:3881 / 3892
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Research on ethics in nursing care for older people: A literature review
    Suhonen, Riitta
    Stolt, Minna
    Launis, Veikko
    Leino-Kilpi, Helena
    NURSING ETHICS, 2010, 17 (03) : 337 - 352
  • [22] Characteristics, methodological, and reporting quality of scoping reviews published in nursing journals: A systematic review
    Woo, Brigitte Fong Yeong
    Tam, Wilson Wai San
    Williams, Michelle Y. Y.
    Yong, Jenna Qing Yun Ow
    Cheong, Zu Yu
    Ong, Yoke Chin
    Poon, Sum Nok
    Goh, Yong Shian
    JOURNAL OF NURSING SCHOLARSHIP, 2023, 55 (04) : 874 - 885
  • [23] APPLICATION OF HUMANISTIC NURSING THEORY IN HEALTHCARE: AN INTEGRATIVE LITERATURE REVIEW
    Morais de Oliveira, Ramonyer Kayo
    Candido de Oliveira Salvador, Petala Tuani
    Pereira Santos, Viviane Euzebia
    REVISTA DE PESQUISA-CUIDADO E FUNDAMENTAL ONLINE, 2012, 4 (01): : 2695 - 2704
  • [24] Attitudes and perceptions about ageism among nursing students: a scoping review
    Fhon, Jack Roberto Silva
    Alves, Natalia
    Neto, Alexandre Pereira dos Santos
    Djinan, Alice Regina Felipe Silva
    Laurenti, Anaclara Viggiano
    Lima, Eveline Fontes Costa
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2024, 32
  • [25] Attitudes and perceptions about ageism among nursing students: a scoping review
    Fhon, Jack Roberto Silva
    Alves, Natalia
    Neto, Alexandre Pereira dos Santos
    Djinan, Alice Regina Felipe Silva
    Laurenti, Anaclara Viggiano
    Lima, Eveline Fontes Costa
    REVISTA LATINO-AMERICANA DE ENFERMAGEM, 2024, 32
  • [26] Understanding ageism towards older nursing staff and service users: A systematic mapping review from the perspective of clinical leaders and healthcare managers
    Schuettengruber, Gerhilde
    Olsson, Maja M.
    Holmberg, Christopher
    Grossschaedl, Franziska
    Hessman, Eva
    Sjoblom, Helen
    Heckemann, Birgit
    GERIATRIC NURSING, 2024, 58 : 171 - 182
  • [27] Ageism combating strategies in oral healthcare: A systematic review
    Mendes, Mariana Sarmet Smiderle
    Ferreira, Camila Lopes
    Jardini, Maria Aparecida Neves
    Childs, Christopher Andrew
    Marchini, Leonardo
    SPECIAL CARE IN DENTISTRY, 2025, 45 (01)
  • [28] Ageism in the Fitness and Health Industry: A Review of the Literature
    Jin, Bora
    Harvey, Idethia Shevon
    JOURNAL OF AGING AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2021, 29 (01) : 99 - 115
  • [29] Strategies to promote the impact of systematic reviews on healthcare policy: a systematic review of the literature
    Bunn, Frances
    Sworn, Katie
    EVIDENCE & POLICY, 2011, 7 (04): : 403 - 428
  • [30] A global perspective of advanced practice nursing research: A review of systematic reviews
    Kilpatrick, Kelley
    Savard, Isabelle
    Audet, Li-Anne
    Costanzo, Gina
    Khan, Mariam
    Atallah, Renee
    Jabbour, Mira
    Zhou, Wentao
    Wheeler, Kathy
    Ladd, Elissa
    Gray, Deborah C.
    Henderson, Colette
    Spies, Lori A.
    McGrath, Heather
    Rogers, Melanie
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (07):