A Review of the Virological Efficacy of the 4 World Health Organization-Recommended Tenofovir-Containing Regimens for Initial HIV Therapy

被引:53
作者
Tang, Michele W. [1 ]
Kanki, Phyllis J. [2 ]
Shafer, Robert W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Dept Med, Div Infect Dis, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Immunol & Infect Dis, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
TREATMENT-NAIVE PATIENTS; ANTIRETROVIRAL THERAPY; COMBINATION THERAPY; DISOPROXIL FUMARATE; DAILY NEVIRAPINE; EFAVIRENZ; SAFETY; EMTRICITABINE; LAMIVUDINE; INFECTION;
D O I
10.1093/cid/cir1034
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
We systematically reviewed studies of the virological efficacy of the 4 new tenofovir (TDF)-containing regimens recommended for initial antiretroviral (ARV) therapy in the 2010 World Health Organization ARV Treatment Guidelines. Thirty-three studies assessed the efficacy of 1 or more TDF-containing regimens: TDF/lamivudine (3TC)/nevirapine (NVP) (n = 3), TDF/emtricitabine (FTC)/NVP (n = 9), TDF/3TC/efavirenz (EFV) (n = 6), and TDF/FTC/EFV (n = 19). TDF/3TC/NVP was the least well-studied and appeared the least efficacious of the 4 regimens. In 2 comparative studies, TDF/3TC/NVP was associated with significantly more virological failure than AZT/3TC/NVP; a third study was terminated prematurely because of early virological failure. TDF/FTC/NVP was either equivalent or inferior to its comparator arms. TDF/3TC/EFV was equivalent to its comparator arms. TDF/FTC/EFV was equivalent or superior to its comparator arms. Possible explanations for these findings include the greater antiviral activity of EFV versus NVP and longer intracellular half-life of FTC-triphosphate versus 3TC-triphosphate. Further study of TDF/3TC/NVP is required before it is widely deployed for initial ARV therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:862 / 875
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 6 IAS C HIV PATH TRE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 6 IAS C HIV PATH TRE
[3]  
Arumainayagam J, 2008, J INT AIDS SOC, V11, pP15
[4]  
Campbell T, 2011, 18 C RETR OPP INF BO
[5]   Randomized, phase 2 evaluation of two single-tablet regimens elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate versus efavirenz/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the initial treatment of HIV infection [J].
Cohen, Calvin ;
Elion, Richard ;
Ruane, Peter ;
Shamblaw, David ;
DeJesus, Edwin ;
Rashbaum, Bruce ;
Chuck, Steven L. ;
Yale, Kitty ;
Liu, Hui C. ;
Warren, David R. ;
Ramanathan, Srinivasan ;
Kearney, Brian P. .
AIDS, 2011, 25 (06) :F7-F12
[6]   Once-daily nevirapine dosing: a pharmacokinetics, efficacy and safety review [J].
Cooper, C. L. ;
van Heeswijk, R. P. G. .
HIV MEDICINE, 2007, 8 (01) :1-7
[7]   Atazanavir Plus Ritonavir or Efavirenz as Part of a 3-Drug Regimen for Initial Treatment of HIV-1 [J].
Daar, Eric S. ;
Tierney, Camlin ;
Fischl, Margaret A. ;
Sax, Paul E. ;
Mollan, Katie ;
Budhathoki, Chakra ;
Godfrey, Catherine ;
Jahed, Nasreen C. ;
Myers, Laurie ;
Katzenstein, David ;
Farajallah, Awny ;
Rooney, James F. ;
Pappa, Keith A. ;
Woodward, William C. ;
Patterson, Kristine ;
Bolivar, Hector ;
Benson, Constance A. ;
Collier, Ann C. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 154 (07) :445-456
[8]  
Darin K, 2010, 10 INT AIDS C
[9]   A randomised comparison of safety and efficacy of nevirapine vs. atazanavir/ritonavir combined with tenofovir/emtricitabine in treatment-naive patients [J].
DeJesus, E. ;
Mills, A. ;
Bhatti, L. ;
Conner, C. ;
Storfer, S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2011, 65 (12) :1240-1249
[10]  
DeJesus E., 2008, 48 INT C ANT AG CHEM