Reliability and minimal detectible change values for gait kinematics and kinetics in healthy adults

被引:256
作者
Wilken, Jason M. [1 ]
Rodriguez, Kelly M. [1 ]
Brawner, Melissa [1 ]
Darter, Benjamin J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Brooke Army Med Ctr, Ctr Intrepid, Dept Orthoped & Rehabil, Ft Sam Houston, TX 78234 USA
关键词
Reliability; Minimal Detectable Change; Intraclass Correlation Coefficient; Gait analysis; LIMB 3-DIMENSIONAL KINEMATICS; RETEST RELIABILITY; WALKING; REPEATABILITY; CHILDREN; PARAMETERS; SPEED;
D O I
10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.09.105
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Computerized assessment of gait is commonly used in both research and clinical settings to quantify gait mechanics and detect change in performance. Minimal Detectable Change values have only recently been reported, are only available for patient populations, and in many cases exceed 10 degrees. Twenty nine healthy individuals underwent two biomechanical gait assessments separated by 5.6 (SD 2.2) days, with two raters for each session. All subjects walked at a self selected pace and three controlled velocities. ICC. SEM and MDC for kinematic and kinetic measures were calculated for interrater-intrasession, intrarater-intersession and interrater-intersession. ICC values were in the good to excellent range (r > 0.75) for all kinematic and kinetic variables and all comparisons. M DC values were lower than previously published data for all similar comparisons. The results of the current study suggest that reliability is good to excellent across a range of controlled walking velocities and the introduction of a second rater does not appreciably impact ICC or MDC values. In young healthy adults changes in gait kinematics of greater than approximately 50 can be identified when comparing between sessions. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:301 / 307
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1981, MEASUREMENT INTERRAT
[2]   Repeatability of gait data using a functional hip joint centre and a mean helical knee axis [J].
Besier, TF ;
Sturnieks, DL ;
Alderson, JA ;
Lloyd, DG .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2003, 36 (08) :1159-1168
[3]   RELIABILITY OF GONIOMETRIC MEASUREMENTS [J].
BOONE, DC ;
AZEN, SP ;
LIN, CM ;
SPENCE, C ;
BARON, C ;
LEE, L .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1978, 58 (11) :1355-1360
[4]   A six degrees-of-freedom marker set for gait analysis: Repeatability and comparison with a modified Helen Hayes set [J].
Collins, Thomas D. ;
Ghoussayni, Salim N. ;
Ewins, David J. ;
Kent, Jenny A. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2009, 30 (02) :173-180
[5]   Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change [J].
de Vet, Henrica C. ;
Terwee, Caroline B. ;
Ostelo, Raymond W. ;
Beckerman, Heleen ;
Knol, Dirk L. ;
Bouter, Lex M. .
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES, 2006, 4 (1)
[6]   Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry - Part 4: assessment of anatomical landmark misplacement and its effects on joint kinematics [J].
Della Croce, U ;
Leardini, A ;
Chiari, L ;
Cappozzo, A .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2005, 21 (02) :226-237
[7]   Goniometry and linear assessments to monitor movement outcomes: Are they reliable tools in burn survivors? [J].
Edgar, Dale ;
Finlay, Vidya ;
Wu, Andy ;
Wood, Fiona .
BURNS, 2009, 35 (01) :58-62
[8]   The influence of gait speed on local dynamic stability of walking [J].
England, Scott A. ;
Granata, Kevin P. .
GAIT & POSTURE, 2007, 25 (02) :172-178
[9]   A comparison of within- and between-day reliability of discrete 3D lower extremity variables in runners [J].
Ferber, R ;
Davis, IM ;
Williams, DS ;
Laughton, C .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2002, 20 (06) :1139-1145
[10]  
FRIGO C, 1986, AM J PHYS MED REHAB, V65, P51