Standardized technique of laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy in gynecologic cancer optimizes the perioperative outcomes

被引:12
作者
Kavallaris, Andreas [1 ]
Kalogiannidis, Ioannis [1 ]
Chalvatzas, Nektarios [1 ]
Hornemann, Amadeus [1 ]
Bohlmann, Michael K. [1 ]
Diedrich, Klaus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Schleswig Holstein, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
关键词
Laparoscopy; Standardized technique; Pelvic; Para-aortic lymphadenectomy; Gynecologic cancer; LYMPH-NODE DISSECTION; CERVICAL-CANCER; MALIGNANCIES; MULTICENTER; MANAGEMENT; CARCINOMA;
D O I
10.1007/s00404-010-1580-4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
The main objective of this study is to illustrate the effectiveness and the safety of standardized technique of laparoscopic lymphadenectomy (LNE), newly introduced in a University Hospital, in patients with gynecologic malignancy. A cohort of 104 patients with gynaecologic malignancies (71 with endometrial and 33 with cervical cancer), who underwent laparoscopic pelvic with or without para-aortic LNE between September 2008 and March 2010, were analyzed. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (TLH & BSO) was the standard approach for patients with endometrial cancer (n = 71), while laparoscopic (nerve sparing) radical hysterectomy (n = 29), laparoscopic-assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (n = 2) and radical trachelectomy was the treatment for patients with cervical cancer. All LNE were performed by a learning team under the supervision of an expert surgeon, familiar with the technique. The median number of pelvic lymph nodes yielded was 22 (range 16-34) and of para-aortic 14 (range 12-24). The mean operative time +/- A standard deviation for pelvic LNE for each side was 29 +/- A 17 and 64 +/- A 29 min for para-aortic LNE. The overall complication rate was 7.6% (n = 8). Two patients were reoperated laparoscopically, one because of postoperative hemorrhage and the other because of lymphocyst formation; laparoconversion was not necessary. Laparoscopic lymphadenectomy performed by a learning team with standardized technique is effective with adequate number of harvested nodes, in acceptable operative time and with low rate of perioperative complications.
引用
收藏
页码:1373 / 1380
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Establishing a new technique of laparoscopic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy [J].
Altgassen, C ;
Possover, M ;
Krause, N ;
Plaul, K ;
Michels, W ;
Schneider, A .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2000, 95 (03) :348-352
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT J GYNECOL OBSTET
[3]   THE ROLE OF LAPAROSCOPIC LYMPHADENECTOMY IN THE MANAGEMENT OF CERVICAL-CARCINOMA [J].
CHILDERS, JM ;
HATCH, K ;
SURWIT, EA .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1992, 47 (01) :38-43
[4]  
CHILDERS JM, 1993, OBSTET GYNECOL, V82, P741
[5]   NEW GYNECOLOGIC CANCER STAGING [J].
CREASMAN, WT .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1995, 58 (02) :157-158
[6]   A prospective randomized study of laparoscopy and minilaparotomy in the management of benign adnexal masses [J].
Fanfani, F ;
Fagotti, A ;
Ercoli, A ;
Bifulco, G ;
Longo, R ;
Mancuso, S ;
Scambia, G .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (10) :2367-2371
[7]   LYMPH-NODE YIELD FROM LAPAROSCOPIC LYMPHADENECTOMY IN CERVICAL-CANCER - A COMPARATIVE-STUDY [J].
FOWLER, JM ;
CARTER, JR ;
CARLSON, JW ;
MASLONKOWSKI, R ;
BYERS, LJ ;
CARSON, LF ;
TWIGGS, LB .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 1993, 51 (02) :187-192
[8]   EVALUATION AND THE LEARNING-CURVE OF THE FIRST 100 LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMIES [J].
HARKKISIREN, P ;
SJOBERG, J .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1995, 74 (08) :638-641
[9]   Radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT) combined with laparoscopic pelvic lymphadenectomy:: Prospective multicenter study of 100 patients with early cervical cancer [J].
Hertel, Hermann ;
Koehler, Christhardt ;
Grund, Dorothee ;
Hillemanns, Peter ;
Possover, Marc ;
Michels, Wolfgang ;
Schneider, Achim .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2006, 103 (02) :506-511
[10]   Introduction of transperitoneal lymphadenectomy in a gynecologic oncology center:: analysis of 650 laparoscopic pelvic and/or paraaortic transperitoneal lymphadenectornies [J].
Köhler, C ;
Klemm, P ;
Schau, A ;
Possover, M ;
Krause, N ;
Tozzi, R ;
Schneider, A .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2004, 95 (01) :52-61