An Inverted-U Impact of Environmental Regulations on Carbon Emissions in China's Iron and Steel Industry: Mechanisms of Synergy and Innovation Effects

被引:19
作者
Chen, Ya [1 ,2 ]
Fan, Xiaoli [1 ]
Zhou, Qian [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Hefei Univ Technol, Sch Econ, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China
[2] Hefei Univ Technol, Ctr Ind Informat & Econ, Hefei 230601, Peoples R China
[3] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Shanghai Dev, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
[4] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Inst Free Trade Zone, Shanghai 200433, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CO2; emissions; environmental regulations; inverted-U impact; synergy effect; innovation effect; Chinese iron and steel industry; CO2; EMISSIONS; AIR-POLLUTION; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; REGIONAL DIFFERENCES; TECHNOLOGY; LEVEL; DIFFUSION; LOCATION; TRENDS; GROWTH;
D O I
10.3390/su12031038
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Based on a panel data of China's iron and steel (IS) industry from 2000 to 2014, this paper explores the impact of environmental regulations on CO2 emissions in the industry. The results show that there is a clear inverted-U relationship between environmental regulations and CO2 emissions in the IS industry. Additionally, there are regional heterogeneity and regulatory intensity on the impact of enviromnental regulations on CO2 emissions. The results in the eastern region are consistent with the whole sample results, while the upward trend in the central region and the downward trend in the western region together lay the basis for the inverted-U shape of the whole sample. High environmental regulations affect CO2 emissions in an inverted-U shape, while low environmental regulations present a U shape. The mechanisms of environmental regulations affecting CO2 emissions are synergy effect and technological innovation effect. Finally, this paper proposes some policy recommendations according to the above findings.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [1] CO2 emissions, research and technology transfer in China
    Ang, James B.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2009, 68 (10) : 2658 - 2665
  • [2] Is free trade good for the environment?
    Antweiler, W
    Copeland, BR
    Taylor, MS
    [J]. AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2001, 91 (04) : 877 - 908
  • [3] Atkinson R.D., 2012, ISSUES SCI TECHNOL, V6, P84
  • [4] Divestment prevails over the green paradox when anticipating strong future climate policies
    Bauer, Nico
    McGlade, Christophe
    Hilaire, Jerome
    Ekins, Paul
    [J]. NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2018, 8 (02) : 130 - +
  • [5] Environmental regulation and French firms location abroad: An economic geography model in an international comparative study
    Ben Kheder, Sonia
    Zugravu, Natalia
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2012, 77 : 48 - 61
  • [6] Prices, technology development and the rebound effect
    Birol, F
    Keppler, JH
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2000, 28 (6-7) : 457 - 469
  • [7] Incentive-based regulation of CO2 emissions from international aviation
    Carlsson, F
    Hammar, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF AIR TRANSPORT MANAGEMENT, 2002, 8 (06) : 365 - 372
  • [8] Central People's Government of PRC, IR STEEL IND ADJ REV
  • [9] The moderating effect of environmental dynamism on green product innovation and performance
    Chan, Hing Kai
    Yee, Rachel W. Y.
    Dai, Jing
    Lim, Ming K.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION ECONOMICS, 2016, 181 : 384 - 391
  • [10] Environmental efficiency analysis of transportation system in China: A non-radial DEA approach
    Chang, Young-Tae
    Zhang, Ning
    Danao, Denise
    Zhang, Nan
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2013, 58 : 277 - 283