Preferences for pharmacogenomic testing in polypharmacy patients: a discrete choice experiment

被引:6
作者
Chen, Cheng [1 ]
Roberts, Melissa H. [2 ]
Raisch, Dennis W. [2 ]
Thompson, Todd A. [2 ]
Bachyrycz, Amy [2 ]
Borrego, Matthew E. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Ctr Translat & Policy Res Precis Med TRANSPERS, Dept Clin Pharm, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ New Mexico, Coll Pharm, Albuquerque, NM 87131 USA
关键词
DCE; discrete choice experiment; patient preferences; PGx; pharmacogenomic test; polypharmacy; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS APPLICATIONS; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PRECISION MEDICINE; HEALTH; PERCEPTIONS; TECHNOLOGY; PHYSICIANS; ATTITUDES; PERSPECTIVES; PATERNALISM;
D O I
10.2217/pme-2022-0056
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Aim: To elicit preferences for pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing in polypharmacy patients. Materials & methods: A face-to-face discrete choice experiment survey was designed and administered to adult polypharmacy patients recruited at a local retail pharmacy in Albuquerque (NM, USA). Results: A total of 128 eligible polypharmacy patients completed the discrete choice experiment survey and significantly preferred a PGx test with lower cost, better confidentiality and higher certainty of identifying best medication/dose and side effects and one that can be used to advocate for their treatment needs (all p < 0.01). Conclusion: This is the first study eliciting preferences for PGx testing among polypharmacy patients. The study found most polypharmacy patients were willing to take a PGx test and their preferences were mostly influenced by test cost. Plain language summary Patients who concurrently take five or more medications are at a higher risk of experiencing side effects related to drug-drug/drug-gene interactions. 'One size doesn't fit all' - individuals may respond differently to the same dose of a medication. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing identifies individual genetic information that may help explain better or worse outcomes or potential problems with drug therapies and eventually may help optimize patient treatment. The authors conducted a face-to-face survey to assess preferences for PGx testing in polypharmacy patients and found that most polypharmacy patients were willing to take a PGx test and their preferences were mostly influenced by test cost and performance, as well as the confidentiality of test results.
引用
收藏
页码:535 / 548
页数:14
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]  
Adams J., 2015, DISCRETE CHOICE EXPT
[2]   The landscape of pharmacogenetic testing in a US managed care population [J].
Anderson, Heather D. ;
Crooks, Kristy R. ;
Kao, David P. ;
Aquilante, Christina L. .
GENETICS IN MEDICINE, 2020, 22 (07) :1247-1253
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2019, Medication Safety in Polypharmacy
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2012, How to Conduct a Discrete Choice Experiment for Health Workforce Recruitment and Retention in Remote and Rural Areas: A User Guide with Case Studies
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, MARKETING RES METHOD
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2020, PHARMACOGENOMICS FAQ
[7]   Perceptions of pharmacogenetic research to guide tobacco cessation by patients, providers and leaders in a tribal healthcare setting [J].
Avey, Jaedon P. ;
Hiratsuka, Vanessa Y. ;
Beans, Julie A. ;
Trinidad, Susan Brown ;
Tyndale, Rachel F. ;
Robinson, Renee F. .
PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2016, 17 (04) :405-415
[8]   Regaining the initiative - Forging a new model of the patient physician relationship [J].
Balint, J ;
Shelton, W .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1996, 275 (11) :887-891
[9]   Conjoint Analysis Applications in Health-a Checklist: A Report of the ISPOR Good Research Practices for Conjoint Analysis Task Force [J].
Bridges, John F. P. ;
Hauber, A. Brett ;
Marshall, Deborah ;
Lloyd, Andrew ;
Prosser, Lisa A. ;
Regier, Dean A. ;
Johnson, F. Reed ;
Mauskopf, Josephine .
VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (04) :403-413
[10]   The effect of pharmacogenetic profiling with a clinical decision support tool on healthcare resource utilization and estimated costs in the elderly exposed to polypharmacy [J].
Brixner, D. ;
Biltaji, E. ;
Bress, A. ;
Unni, S. ;
Ye, X. ;
Mamiya, T. ;
Ashcraft, K. ;
Biskupiak, J. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 19 (03) :213-228