Robot-assisted gastrectomy for gastric cancer in a patient with a colostomy: A case report with adaptive techniques and technical points

被引:1
作者
Nakaya, Seiichi [1 ]
Sagawa, Hiroyuki [1 ]
Hayakawa, Shunsuke [1 ]
Fujihata, Shiro [1 ]
Okubo, Tomotaka [1 ]
Hirokawa, Takahisa [1 ]
Morimoto, Mamoru [1 ]
Tanaka, Tatsuya [1 ]
Takahashi, Hiroki [1 ]
Morimoto, Yoichi [1 ]
Ogawa, Ryo [1 ]
Takiguchi, Shuji [1 ]
机构
[1] Nagoya City Univ, Dept Gastroenterol Surg, Grad Sch Med Sci, 1 Kawasumi MIzuho, Nagoya, Aichi 4678602, Japan
关键词
colostomy; gastrectomy; robotic surgery;
D O I
10.1111/ases.12787
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Robot-assisted surgery is considered a standard option for procedures on many organs. However, there are still few reports of useful adaptations for various patient conditions. We were able to safely perform robot-assisted distal gastrectomy on a patient with a colostomy. A 75-year-old man presented with gastric cancer, type 0-IIc, 2.5 cm in diameter. Before the gastric surgery, colectomy was performed for obstructive rectal cancer and a colostomy was formed in the right upper abdomen. The following adaptations were required to perform robot-assisted distal gastrectomy to avoid injuring the colon. After moving the port placement to the left side, we used a Penrose drain to retract the intra-abdominal colon connecting to the colostomy, pulling it to the head side. Then we projected the image of the colostomy in the da Vinci console. This case has shown that it is possible to safely perform robot-assisted surgery with adaptations tailored to the patient's conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:544 / 547
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Aisu Y, 2018, SURG CASE REP, V4, DOI 10.1186/s40792-018-0422-7
  • [2] Caruso S, 2017, WORLD J CLIN ONCOL, V8, P273, DOI 10.5306/wjco.v8.i3.273
  • [3] Robotic versus laparoscopic Gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a systematic review and updated meta-analysis
    Chen, Ke
    Pan, Yu
    Zhang, Bin
    Maher, Hendi
    Wang, Xian-fa
    Cai, Xiu-jun
    [J]. BMC SURGERY, 2017, 17
  • [4] Case report about a successful full robotic radical gastric cancer surgery with intracorporeal robot-sewn anastomosis in a patient with situs inversus totalis and a two-and-a-half-year follow-up study
    Dai, Hai-Bin
    Wang, Zhi-Chun
    Feng, Xiao-Bo
    Wang, Gang
    Li, Wei-Yan
    Hang, Chun-Hua
    Jiang, Zhi-Wei
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 16
  • [5] Robot-assisted gastric surgery
    Hashizume, M
    Sugimachi, K
    [J]. SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2003, 83 (06) : 1429 - +
  • [6] Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy
    Obama, Kazutaka
    Kim, Yoo-Min
    Kang, Dae Ryong
    Son, Taeil
    Kim, Hyoung-Il
    Noh, Sung Hoon
    Hyung, Woo Jin
    [J]. GASTRIC CANCER, 2018, 21 (02) : 285 - 295
  • [7] Surgical robotics: Impact of motion scaling on task performance
    Prasad, SM
    Prasad, SM
    Maniar, HS
    Chu, C
    Schuessler, RB
    Damiano, RJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2004, 199 (06) : 863 - 868
  • [8] A meta-analysis of robotic versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Shen, Wei-Song
    Xi, Hong-Qing
    Chen, Lin
    Wei, Bo
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (10): : 2795 - 2802
  • [9] Potential advantages of robotic radical gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in comparison with conventional laparoscopic approach: a single institutional retrospective comparative cohort study
    Suda, Koichi
    Man-i, Mariko
    Ishida, Yoshinori
    Kawamura, Yuichiro
    Satoh, Seiji
    Uyama, Ichiro
    [J]. SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (03): : 673 - 685
  • [10] Novel Integrated Robotic Approach for Suprapancreatic D2 Nodal Dissection for Treating Gastric Cancer: Technique and Initial Experience
    Uyama, Ichiro
    Kanaya, Seiichiro
    Ishida, Yoshinori
    Inaba, Kazuki
    Suda, Koichi
    Satoh, Seiji
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 36 (02) : 331 - 337