The self-relevant implications of the group-value model: Group membership, self-worth, and treatment quality

被引:190
作者
Smith, HJ
Tyler, TR
Huo, YJ
Ortiz, DJ
Lind, EA
机构
[1] Sonoma State Univ, Dept Psychol, Rohnert Park, CA 94928 USA
[2] New York Univ, New York, NY 10003 USA
[3] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[4] Duke Univ, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1006/jesp.1998.1360
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Past research demonstrates that quality of treatment is linked to support of authorities and acceptance of their decisions, particularly when the authority represents a valued ingroup. The group-value model suggests that the group membership effect occurs because people derive important self-relevant information from evaluations of how they are treated by ingroup authorities. Two experiments and a correlational study tested whether the group membership of the authority moderates the effect of treatment quality on participants' views of themselves. The results show that better treatment quality is more closely related to feelings of respect and positive self-esteem when the authority represents an ingroup than when the authority represents an outgroup. Moreover, there is some suggestive evidence that the effect of treatment quality on self-esteem is mediated by perceived respect. These findings supper? the argument that treatment quality in an ingroup context is particularly important because people derive their sense of self, in part, from knowing that a group they value regards them as respected members. (C) 1998 Academic Press.
引用
收藏
页码:470 / 493
页数:24
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
Abrams D., 1988, SOCIAL IDENTIFICAITO
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1991, MEASURES PERSONALITY
[3]  
Augoustinos M., 1995, Social cognition: An integrated introduction
[4]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[5]   IN-GROUP IDENTIFICATION AS A FUNCTION OF DEPERSONALIZATION, DISTINCTIVENESS, AND STATUS [J].
BREWER, MB ;
MANZI, JM ;
SHAW, JS .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1993, 4 (02) :88-92
[6]   An integrative framework for explaining reactions to decisions: Interactive effects of outcomes and procedures [J].
Brockner, J ;
Wiesenfeld, BM .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1996, 120 (02) :189-208
[7]  
Brown R. J., 1981, INTERGROUP BEHAV, P33
[8]   A METHOD FOR TEACHING ABOUT VERBAL AND NONVERBAL-COMMUNICATION [J].
COSTANZO, M ;
ARCHER, D .
TEACHING OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1991, 18 (04) :223-226
[9]   SOCIAL STIGMA AND SELF-ESTEEM - THE SELF-PROTECTIVE PROPERTIES OF STIGMA [J].
CROCKER, J ;
MAJOR, B .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1989, 96 (04) :608-630
[10]  
CROCKER J, 1996, UNPUB SELF ESTEEM AF