Quantitative microbial risk assessment: methods and quality assurance

被引:2
|
作者
Boone, I. [1 ]
Van der Stede, Y. [1 ]
Aerts, M. [2 ]
Mintiens, K. [1 ]
Daube, G. [3 ]
机构
[1] Vet & Agrochem Res Ctr VAR, Coordinat Ctr Vet Diagnost, Groeselenberg 99, B-1180 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Hasselt Univ, Interuniv Inst Biostat & Stat Bioinformat, B-3590 Diepenbeek, Belgium
[3] Univ Liege, Fac Vet Med, Dept Food Sci, Microbiol Sect, B-4000 Liege, Belgium
来源
VLAAMS DIERGENEESKUNDIG TIJDSCHRIFT | 2010年 / 79卷 / 05期
关键词
MINCED PORK MEAT; HUMAN SALMONELLOSIS; HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION; ASSESSMENT MODEL; CAMPYLOBACTER; UNCERTAINTY; NUSAP; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.21825/vdt.87467
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) is used to estimate the risk level of pathogens along the food chain and to support management decisions for the reduction of food safety risks. The degree of credibility that can be attached to risk assessment results depends largely on the quality and quantity of the data, the model structure and the assumptions made. Quality Assurance (QA) in QMRA is defined as the structure that ensures that all the steps in the risk evaluation process are scientifically based so that the policy questions being posed can be answered. Whereas sensitivity analysis and scenario analysis are generally applied in QMRA, formal methods for the evaluation of data quality, the critical evaluation of assumptions, structured expert elicitation, the checklist approach and peer review are rarely used in QMRA, even though they would improve the transparency of the risk analysis process. An overview of QA methods for QMRA is presented. The degree of implementation of these methods should be proportionate to the stakes of the risk management questions and should be discussed in consultation between the risk assessors and the risk managers.
引用
收藏
页码:367 / 380
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Quantitative microbial risk assessment
    Berg, G
    RISK ANALYSIS, 2001, 21 (05) : 979 - 980
  • [2] Quantitative microbial risk assessment model for Legionella:: Summary of methods and results
    Armstrong, Thomas W.
    Haas, Charles N.
    LEGIONELLA: STATE OF THE ART 30 YEARS AFTER ITS RECOGNITION, 2006, : 486 - +
  • [3] RAPID MICROBIAL METHODS DEVELOPMENT FOR QUALITY ASSURANCE OF TOILETRIES
    LEECH, R
    JOURNAL OF APPLIED BACTERIOLOGY, 1986, 61 (06): : R5 - R5
  • [4] NUSAP: a method to evaluate the quality of assumptions in quantitative microbial risk assessment
    Boone, Ides
    Van der Stede, Yves
    Dewulf, Jeroen
    Messens, Winy
    Aerts, Marc
    Daube, Georges
    Mintiens, Koen
    JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2010, 13 (03) : 337 - 352
  • [5] Risk Assessment of Patient-Specific Quality Assurance Methods for Particle Therapy
    Robertson, Daniel
    Dahlgren, Christina
    Chen, Chin-Cheng
    Li, Heng
    Emert, Frank
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2024, 194 : S4922 - S4926
  • [6] Methods for Handling Left-Censored Data in Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment
    Canales, Robert A.
    Wilson, Amanda M.
    Pearce-Walker, Jennifer I.
    Verhougstraete, Marc P.
    Reynolds, Kelly A.
    APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2018, 84 (20)
  • [7] Synergies of FMEA and other quantitative quality methods for an optimized quality assurance
    Pickard, K
    Müller, P
    Bertsche, B
    QUALITY, RELIABILITY, AND MAINTENANCE, 2004, : 35 - 38
  • [8] Taking account of genomics in quantitative microbial risk assessment: what methods? what issues?
    Guillier, Laurent
    Palma, Federica
    Fritsch, Lena
    CURRENT OPINION IN FOOD SCIENCE, 2022, 48
  • [9] Comparison of Monte Carlo and fuzzy math simulation methods for quantitative microbial risk assessment
    Davidson, VJ
    Ryks, J
    JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2003, 66 (10) : 1900 - 1910
  • [10] Quantitative tools in microbial and chemical risk assessment
    Zabulione, Aelita
    Valdramidis, Vasilis P.
    EFSA JOURNAL, 2023, 21