Limitation of Water Footprint Sustainability Assessment: A Review

被引:8
作者
Ansorge, Libor [1 ]
Stejskalova, L. [1 ]
Volosinova, D. [1 ]
Dlabal, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vyzkumny Ustav Vodohospodarski TG Masaryka, Prague, Czech Republic
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT | 2022年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
volumetric water footprint; sustainability assessment; sustainable development; limitation of methodology; TREATMENT PLANTS; BLUE; SCARCITY; IRRIGATION; INSIGHT; CARBON; GREEN;
D O I
10.14207/ejsd.2022.v11n2p1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Water is nature resource that is essential for all life, for the functioning of ecosystems, and also for the human society. Sustainable use of water resource is important for sustainable development of human society. Water scarcity can lead to conflicts between different water users. Therefore, several sustainability assessment tools were developed in recent years. Water Footprint Sustainability Assessment, which is a part of Water Footprint Assessment methodology, is one of them. Each sustainability assessment tool has its own limitations. It is important to know these limitations because incorrect application of sustainability assessment can lead to erroneous or improper decisions. In this article, risks connected to the Water Footprint Sustainability Assessment are reviewed and discussed in several examples. Individual parts are focused on blue, green, and grey water sustainability assessment. The article contributes to the scientific debate on limits of Water Footprint Sustainability Assessment as the key element of everyday applications, identification of needs of future research and subsequent development of new or improved procedures of sustainability assessment in the framework of Water Footprint Assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 78 条
[31]  
Gleick PH., 1993, Water in crisis: A guide to the world's fresh water resources
[32]   A new approach to the allocation of the blue water footprint of reservoirs using fuzzy AHP model [J].
Golabi, Mohammad Reza ;
Radmanesh, Feridon .
MODELING EARTH SYSTEMS AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 6 (02) :793-797
[33]   Wastewater Treatment Plant Assessment by Quantifying the Carbon and Water Footprint [J].
Gomez-Llanos, Eva ;
Matias-Sanchez, Agustin ;
Duran-Barroso, Pablo .
WATER, 2020, 12 (11) :1-16
[34]   Management effectiveness assessment in wastewater treatment plants through a new water footprint indicator [J].
Gomez-Llanos, Eva ;
Duran-Barroso, Pablo ;
Matias-Sanchez, Agustin .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 198 :463-471
[35]   Quantification of the water, energy and carbon footprints of wastewater treatment plants in China considering a water-energy nexus perspective [J].
Gu, Yifan ;
Dong, Ya-nan ;
Wang, Hongtao ;
Keller, Arturo ;
Xu, Jin ;
Chiramba, Thomas ;
Li, Fengting .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 60 :402-409
[36]   The water footprint of hydroelectricity: a methodological comparison from a case study in New Zealand [J].
Herath, Indika ;
Deurer, Markus ;
Horne, David ;
Singh, Ranvir ;
Clothier, Brent .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2011, 19 (14) :1582-1589
[37]  
Hoekstra A. Y, 2011, WATER FOOTPRINT ASSE
[38]   Green-blue water accounting in a soil water balance [J].
Hoekstra, Arjen Y. .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 2019, 129 :112-117
[39]   Water Footprint Assessment: Evolvement of a New Research Field [J].
Hoekstra, Arjen Y. .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2017, 31 (10) :3061-3081
[40]   A critique on the water-scarcity weighted water footprint in LCA [J].
Hoekstra, Arjen Y. .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2016, 66 :564-573