Limitation of Water Footprint Sustainability Assessment: A Review

被引:8
作者
Ansorge, Libor [1 ]
Stejskalova, L. [1 ]
Volosinova, D. [1 ]
Dlabal, J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vyzkumny Ustav Vodohospodarski TG Masaryka, Prague, Czech Republic
来源
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT | 2022年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
volumetric water footprint; sustainability assessment; sustainable development; limitation of methodology; TREATMENT PLANTS; BLUE; SCARCITY; IRRIGATION; INSIGHT; CARBON; GREEN;
D O I
10.14207/ejsd.2022.v11n2p1
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Water is nature resource that is essential for all life, for the functioning of ecosystems, and also for the human society. Sustainable use of water resource is important for sustainable development of human society. Water scarcity can lead to conflicts between different water users. Therefore, several sustainability assessment tools were developed in recent years. Water Footprint Sustainability Assessment, which is a part of Water Footprint Assessment methodology, is one of them. Each sustainability assessment tool has its own limitations. It is important to know these limitations because incorrect application of sustainability assessment can lead to erroneous or improper decisions. In this article, risks connected to the Water Footprint Sustainability Assessment are reviewed and discussed in several examples. Individual parts are focused on blue, green, and grey water sustainability assessment. The article contributes to the scientific debate on limits of Water Footprint Sustainability Assessment as the key element of everyday applications, identification of needs of future research and subsequent development of new or improved procedures of sustainability assessment in the framework of Water Footprint Assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 14
页数:14
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Allan JohnAnthony., 1997, Virtual water: a long term solution for water short Middle Eastern economies?
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2014, 14046 ISO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Sustainable Development Goal 6 Synthesis Report 2018 on Water and Sanitation, DOI DOI 10.1126/SCIENCE.278.5339.827
[4]  
Ansorge L., 2020, ENTECHO, V3, P7, DOI [10.35933/ENTECHO, DOI 10.35933/ENTECHO]
[5]  
Ansorge L., 2020, VODOHOSPODARSKE TECH, V62, P4, DOI [DOI 10.46555/VTEI.2020.04.002, 10.46555/VTEI.2020.04.002]
[6]  
Ansorge Libor, 2020, Tecnura, V24, P119
[7]  
Ansorge Libor, 2020, Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering (JUEE), V14, P144, DOI 10.4090/juee.2020.v14n1.144149
[8]   Effect of WWTP size on grey water footprint-Czech Republic case study [J].
Ansorge, Libor ;
Stejskalova, Lada ;
Dlabal, Jiri .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2020, 15 (10)
[9]   Grey water footprint as a tool for implementing the Water Framework Directive - Temelin nuclear power station [J].
Ansorge, Libor ;
Stejskalova, Lada ;
Dlabal, Jiri .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2020, 263
[10]   The Water Footprint of Hydropower Production-State of the Art and Methodological Challenges [J].
Bakken, Tor Haakon ;
Killingtveit, Anund ;
Alfredsen, Knut .
GLOBAL CHALLENGES, 2017, 1 (05)