Causes of Jets in the Quasi-Perpendicular Magnetosheath

被引:15
|
作者
Kajdic, Primoz [1 ]
Raptis, Savvas [2 ]
Blanco-Cano, Xochitl [1 ]
Karlsson, Tomas [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Geofis, Dept Ciencias Espaciales, Ciudad Univ, Ciudad De Mexico, Mexico
[2] KTH Royal Inst Technol, Space & Plasma Phys, Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
magnetosheath jets; quasi-perpendicular magnetosheath; reconnection exhausts; mirror-mode waves; convected flux tubes; HIGH-SPEED JETS; MAGNETIC RECONNECTION; CLUSTER; PLASMA; MAGNETOPAUSE; BOUNDARY; MISSION;
D O I
10.1029/2021GL093173
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Magnetosheath jets are currently an important topic in the field of magnetosheath physics. It is thought that 97% of the jets are produced by the shock rippling at quasi-parallel shocks. Recently, large statistical studies of magnetosheath jets have been performed, however, it is not clear whether rippling also produces jets found downstream of quasi-perpendicular shocks. We analyze four types of events in the quasi-perpendicular magnetosheath with signatures characteristic of magnetosheath jets, namely increased density and/or dynamic pressure that were not produced by the shock rippling: (a) magnetic flux tubes connected to the quasi-parallel bow-shock, (b) nonreconnecting current sheets, (c) reconnection exhausts, and (d) mirror-mode waves. The flux tubes are downstream equivalents of the upstream traveling foreshocks. Magnetosheath jets can impact the magnetopause, so knowing the conditions under which they form may enable us to understand their signatures in the magnetosphere.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Whistler Waves in the Quasi-Parallel and Quasi-Perpendicular Magnetosheath
    Svenningsson, I.
    Yordanova, E.
    Khotyaintsev, Yu. V.
    Andre, M.
    Cozzani, G.
    Steinvall, K.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2024, 129 (06)
  • [2] Comparing Quasi-Parallel and Quasi-Perpendicular Configuration in the Terrestrial Magnetosheath: Multifractal Analysis
    Gurchumelia, Alexandre
    Sorriso-Valvo, Luca
    Burgess, David
    Yordanova, Emiliya
    Elbakidze, Khatuna
    Kharshiladze, Oleg
    Kvaratskhelia, Diana
    FRONTIERS IN PHYSICS, 2022, 10
  • [3] Alfven vortex filaments observed in magnetosheath downstream of a quasi-perpendicular bow shock
    Alexandrova, O.
    Mangeney, A.
    Maksimovic, M.
    Cornilleau-Wehrlin, N.
    Bosqued, J. -M.
    Andre, M.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2006, 111 (A12)
  • [4] Classifying the Magnetosheath Behind the Quasi-Parallel and Quasi-Perpendicular Bow Shock by Local Measurements
    Karlsson, T.
    Raptis, S.
    Trollvik, H.
    Nilsson, H.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2021, 126 (09)
  • [5] The properties and causes of rippling in quasi-perpendicular collisionless shock front
    Lowe, RE
    Burgess, D
    ANNALES GEOPHYSICAE, 2003, 21 (03) : 671 - 679
  • [6] Some features of the plasma flow in the magnetosheath behind quasi-parallel and quasi-perpendicular bow shocks
    Shevyrev, NN
    Zastenker, GN
    PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2005, 53 (1-3) : 95 - 102
  • [7] Evolution of High-Speed Jets and Plasmoids Downstream of the Quasi-Perpendicular Bow Shock
    Goncharov, O.
    Gunell, H.
    Hamrin, M.
    Chong, S.
    JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, 2020, 125 (06)
  • [8] On turbulence in the quasi-perpendicular bow shock
    Hamza, A. M.
    Meziane, K.
    PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2011, 59 (07) : 475 - 481
  • [9] Quasi-perpendicular shock structure and processes
    Bale, SD
    Balikhin, MA
    Horbury, TS
    Krasnoselskikh, VV
    Kucharek, H
    Möbius, E
    Walker, SN
    Balogh, A
    Burgess, D
    Lembège, B
    Lucek, EA
    Scholer, M
    Schwartz, SJ
    Thomsen, MF
    SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, 2005, 118 (1-4) : 161 - 203
  • [10] Quasi-perpendicular Shock Structure and Processes
    S. D. Bale
    M. A. Balikhin
    T. S. Horbury
    V. V. Krasnoselskikh
    H. Kucharek
    E. Möbius
    S. N. Walker
    A. Balogh
    D. Burgess
    B. Lembège
    E. A. Lucek
    M. Scholer
    S. J. Schwartz7 10
    M. F. Thomsen
    Space Science Reviews, 2005, 118 : 161 - 203