The incremental information content of investor fear gauge for volatility forecasting in the crude oil futures market

被引:168
作者
Gong, Xu [1 ]
Lin, Boqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] Xiamen Univ, China Inst Studies Energy Policy, Collaborat Innovat Ctr Energy Econ & Energy Polic, Sch Management, Xiamen 361005, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 中国博士后科学基金;
关键词
Volatility forecasting; Investor fear gauge; Crude oil futures; HAR models; Realized volatility; REALIZED VOLATILITY; PRICE VOLATILITY; LONG-MEMORY; MODEL; JUMPS; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2018.06.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper aims to investigate whether investor fear gauge (IFG) contains incremental information content for forecasting the volatility of crude oil futures. For this purpose, we use oil volatility index (OVX) to measure the IFG. Adding the IFG to existing heterogeneous autoregressive (HAR) models, we develop many HAR models with IFG. Subsequently, we employ these HAR models to predict the volatility of crude oil futures. The results from the parameter estimation and out-of-sample forecasting show that the in-sample and out-of-sample performances of HAR models with IFG are significantly better than their corresponding HAR models without IFG. The results are robust in different ways. Thus, the HAR models with IFG are more beneficial to the decision making of all participants (including financial traders, manufacturers and policymakers) in the crude oil futures market. More importantly, the results suggest that the investor fear gauge has a significant positive effect on volatility forecasting, and can help improve the performances of almost all the existing HAR models. (C) 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 386
页数:17
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Leverage vs. feedback: Which Effect drives the oil market? [J].
Aboura, Sofiane ;
Chevallier, Julien .
FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 10 (03) :131-141
[2]   Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts [J].
Andersen, TG ;
Bollerslev, T .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) :885-905
[3]   Roughing it up: Including jump components in the measurement, modeling, and forecasting of return volatility [J].
Andersen, Torben G. ;
Bollerslev, Tim ;
Diebold, Francis X. .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2007, 89 (04) :701-720
[4]   Short-Term Market Risks Implied by Weekly Options [J].
Andersen, Torben G. ;
Fusari, Nicola ;
Todorov, Viktor .
JOURNAL OF FINANCE, 2017, 72 (03) :1335-1386
[5]   A reduced form framework for modeling volatility of speculative prices based on realized variation measures [J].
Andersen, Torben G. ;
Bollerslev, Tim ;
Huang, Xin .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMETRICS, 2011, 160 (01) :176-189
[6]  
[Anonymous], ABSTR APPL AN, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.J0MS.2013.08.004
[7]   Forecasting the conditional volatility of oil spot and futures prices with structural breaks and long memory models [J].
Arouri, Mohamed El Hedi ;
Lahiani, Amine ;
Levy, Aldo ;
Duc Khuong Nguyen .
ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2012, 34 (01) :283-293
[8]   Asymmetry and Long Memory in Volatility Modeling [J].
Asai, Manabu ;
McAleer, Michael ;
Medeiros, Marcelo C. .
JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS, 2012, 10 (03) :495-512
[9]  
Barndorff-Nielsen O., 2010, Measuring downside risk-realised semivariance
[10]  
Barndorff-Nielsen OE., 2004, J FINANCIAL ECONOMET, V2, P1, DOI [DOI 10.1093/JJFINEC/NBH001, 10.1093/jjfinec/nbh001]