Impact of individual protected areas on deforestation and carbon emissions in Acre, Brazil

被引:5
作者
Koskimaki, Teemu [1 ,2 ]
Eklund, Johanna [3 ]
Moulatlet, Gabriel M. [1 ,4 ]
Tuomisto, Hanna [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Turku, Dept Biol, Turun 20014, Finland
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Crawford Sch Publ Policy, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Geosci & Geog, PL 64 Gustaf Hallstromin Katu 2, Helsinki 00014, Finland
[4] Univ Reg Amazonica Ikiam, Fac Ciencias Tierra & Agua, Km 7 Via Muyuna, Tena, Napo, Ecuador
关键词
arc of deforestation; counterfactual; deforestation front; effectiveness; REDD plus; tropics; AVOIDED DEFORESTATION; NATURE-RESERVES; GOVERNANCE; ECOSYSTEM; LOCATION; MAP;
D O I
10.1017/S0376892921000229
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Protecting tropical forests from deforestation is important for mitigating both biodiversity loss and anthropogenic climate change. In Amazonia, a common approach to protected area (PA) impact studies has been to investigate differences among broad PA categories, such as strictly protected, sustainable use and indigenous areas, yet these may be insufficient for the management of PAs at local scales. We used a matching method to compare impacts and carbon emissions avoided during 2011-2016 of individual PAs in the state of Acre (Brazil). Although most PAs had a positive impact and effectively prevented forest loss, we observed substantial variation among them in terms of impacts, pressures and emissions during our study period. The impacts varied from 3.6% avoided to 15.6% induced forest loss compared to expected levels of deforestation estimated for each PA using the matching method. All but a few PAs helped avoid substantial amounts of emissions. Our results emphasize the need for more PA impact studies that compare multiple PAs at the individual level in Amazonia and beyond.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 224
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Coastal aquaculture, mangrove deforestation and blue carbon emissions: Is REDD plus a solution? [J].
Ahmed, Nesar ;
Glaser, Marion .
MARINE POLICY, 2016, 66 :58-66
[22]   Quantifying avoided deforestation in Para: Protected areas, buffer zones and edge effects [J].
Jusys, Tomas .
JOURNAL FOR NATURE CONSERVATION, 2016, 33 :10-17
[23]   Tropical Protected Areas Under Increasing Threats from Climate Change and Deforestation [J].
Tabor, Karyn ;
Hewson, Jennifer ;
Tien, Hsin ;
Gonzalez-Roglich, Mariano ;
Hole, David ;
Williams, John W. .
LAND, 2018, 7 (03)
[24]   Complex Deforestation Patterns in and Around the Protected Areas of Madagascar from 2015 to 2023 [J].
Andrianambinina, F. Ollier D. ;
Ganzhorn, Joerg Ulrich ;
Waeber, Patrick O. ;
Wilme, Lucienne .
LAND, 2025, 14 (04)
[25]   Downgrading, Downsizing, Degazettement, and Reclassification of Protected Areas in Brazil [J].
Bernard, E. ;
Penna, L. A. O. ;
Araujo, E. .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2014, 28 (04) :939-950
[26]   Protected area types, strategies and impacts in Brazil's Amazon: public protected area strategies do not yield a consistent ranking of protected area types by impact [J].
Pfaff, Alexander ;
Robalino, Juan ;
Sandoval, Catalina ;
Herrera, Diego .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2015, 370 (1681)
[27]   Rubber and Carbon: Opportunity Costs, Incentives and Ecosystem Services in Acre, Brazil [J].
Greenleaf, Maron .
DEVELOPMENT AND CHANGE, 2020, 51 (01) :51-72
[28]   Conservation and conflict in the Democratic Republic of Congo: The impacts of warfare, mining, and protected areas on deforestation [J].
Butsic, Van ;
Baumann, Matthias ;
Shortland, Anja ;
Walker, Sarah ;
Kuemmerle, Tobias .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2015, 191 :266-273
[29]   Protected areas and deforestation: new results from high-resolution panel data [J].
Blankespoor, Brian ;
Dasgupta, Susmita ;
Wheeler, David .
NATURAL RESOURCES FORUM, 2017, 41 (01) :55-68
[30]   Setting priorities to avoid deforestation in Amazon protected areas: are we choosing the right indicators? [J].
Nolte, Christoph ;
Agrawal, Arun ;
Barreto, Paulo .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2013, 8 (01)