Improvement of Risk Prediction by Genomic Profiling: Reclassification Measures Versus the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve

被引:56
作者
Mihaescu, Raluca [1 ]
van Zitteren, Moniek [1 ]
van Hoek, Mandy [1 ,4 ]
Sijbrands, Eric J. G. [4 ]
Uitterlinden, Andre G. [4 ,5 ]
Witteman, Jacqueline C. M. [1 ,5 ]
Hofman, Albert [1 ,5 ]
Hunink, M. G. Myriam [1 ,2 ,3 ]
van Duijn, Cornelia M. [1 ,5 ]
Janssens, A. Cecile J. W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Univ Med Ctr, Dept Epidemiol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus MC, Univ Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Hlth Policy & Management, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Erasmus MC, Univ Med Ctr, Dept Internal Med, NL-3000 CA Rotterdam, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Consortium Healthy Aging, Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
diabetes mellitus; type; 2; genetic predisposition to disease; models; statistical; polymorphism; single nucleotide; risk assessment; risk factors; ROC CURVE; SCORE; POLYMORPHISMS; MARKER; ABILITY;
D O I
10.1093/aje/kwq122
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Reclassification is observed even when there is no or minimal improvement in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and it is unclear whether it indicates improved clinical utility. The authors investigated total reclassification, net reclassification improvement, and integrated discrimination improvement for different delta AUC using empirical and simulated data. Empirical analyses compared prediction of type 2 diabetes risk based on age, sex, and body mass index with prediction updated with 18 established genetic risk factors. Simulated data were used to investigate measures of reclassification against delta AUCs of 0.005, 0.05, and 0.10. Total reclassification and net reclassification improvement were calculated for all possible cutoff values. The AUC of type 2 diabetes risk prediction improved from 0.63 to 0.66 when 18 polymorphisms were added, whereas total reclassification ranged from 0% to 22.5% depending on the cutoff value chosen. In the simulation study, total reclassification, net reclassification improvement, and integrated discrimination improvement increased with higher delta AUC. When delta AUC was low (0.005), net reclassification improvement values were close to zero, integrated discrimination improvement was 0.08% (P > 0.05), but total reclassification ranged from 0 to 6.7%. Reclassification increases with increasing AUC but predominantly varies with the cutoff values chosen. Reclassification observed in the absence of AUC increase is unlikely to improve clinical utility.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 361
页数:9
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Alberti KGMM, 1998, DIABETIC MED, V15, P539, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9136(199807)15:7<539::AID-DIA668>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-S
[3]   Use and misuse of the receiver operating characteristic curve in risk prediction [J].
Cook, Nancy R. .
CIRCULATION, 2007, 115 (07) :928-935
[4]   Advances in Measuring the Effect of Individual Predictors of Cardiovascular Risk: The Role of Reclassification Measures [J].
Cook, Nancy R. ;
Ridker, Paul M. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 150 (11) :795-W143
[5]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[6]  
Gavin JR, 1997, DIABETES CARE, V20, P1183
[7]   THE MEANING AND USE OF THE AREA UNDER A RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC (ROC) CURVE [J].
HANLEY, JA ;
MCNEIL, BJ .
RADIOLOGY, 1982, 143 (01) :29-36
[8]  
HARRELL FE, 2006, DESIGN HMISC R FUNCT
[9]   The Rotterdam Study: Objectives and design update [J].
Hofman, Albert ;
Breteler, Monique M. B. ;
van Duijn, Cornelia M. ;
Krestin, Gabriel P. ;
Pols, Huibert A. ;
Stricker, Bruno H. Ch. ;
Tiemeier, Henning ;
Uitterlinden, Andre G. ;
Vingerling, Johannes R. ;
Witteman, Jacqueline C. M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 22 (11) :819-829
[10]  
Ihaka R., 1996, J. Comput. Graph. Stat., V5, P299, DOI [10.2307/1390807, 10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713, DOI 10.1080/10618600.1996.10474713]