What is a biomarker? Research investments and lack of clinical integration necessitate a review of biomarker terminology and validation schema

被引:62
作者
Ptolemy, Adam S. [1 ]
Rifai, Nader [1 ]
机构
[1] Childrens Hosp, Dept Lab Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局; 美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
SURROGATE END-POINTS; MOLECULAR MARKERS; DISCOVERY; GUIDELINES; MICROARRAY; STANDARDS; ACCURACY; PHASES;
D O I
10.3109/00365513.2010.493354
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
A continual trend of annual growth can be seen within research devoted to the discovery and validation of disease biomarkers within both the natural and clinical sciences. This expansion of intellectual endeavours was quantified through database searches of (a) research grant awards provided by the various branches of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and (b) academic publications. A search of awards presented between 1986 and 2009 revealed a total of 28,856 grants awarded by the NIH containing the term "biomarker". The total funds for these awards in 2008 and 2009 alone were over $2.5 billion. During the same respective timeframes, searches of "biomarker" and either "discovery", "genomics", "proteomics" or "metabolomics" yielded a total of 4,928 NIH grants whose combined funding exceeded $1.2 billion. The derived trend in NIH awards paralleled the annual expansion in "biomarker" literature. A PubMed search for the term, between 1990 and 2009, revealed a total of 441,510 published articles, with 38,457 published in 2008. These enormous investments and academic outputs however have not translated into the expected integration of new biomarkers for patient care. For example no proteomics derived biomarkers are currently being utilized in routine clinical management. This translational chasm necessitates a review of the previously proposed biomarker definitions and evaluation schema. A subsequent discussion of both the analytical and pre-analytical considerations for such research is also presented within. This required knowledge should aid scientists in their pursuit and validation of new biological markers of disease.
引用
收藏
页码:6 / 14
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[11]   Critical review of published microarray studies for cancer outcome and guidelines on statistical analysis and reporting [J].
Dupuy, Alain ;
Simon, Richard M. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2007, 99 (02) :147-157
[12]   Research issues and strategies for genomic and proteomic biornarker discovery and validation: a statistical perspective [J].
Feng, Z ;
Prentice, R ;
Srivastava, S .
PHARMACOGENOMICS, 2004, 5 (06) :709-719
[13]  
GOLDBERG KB, 2005, CANC LETT, V31, P1
[14]   $104 million proteomics initiative gets green light [J].
Hede, K .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (18) :1324-1325
[15]  
Hlatky Mark A, 2009, Circulation, V119, P2408, DOI 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192278
[16]   End points and United States food and drug administration approval of oncology drugs [J].
Johnson, JR ;
Williams, G ;
Pazdur, R .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (07) :1404-1411
[17]  
Katz Russell, 2004, NeuroRx, V1, P189, DOI 10.1007/BF03206602
[18]   The Biomarker-Surrogacy Evaluation Schema: a review of the biomarker-surrogate literature and a proposal for a criterion-based, quantitative, multidimensional hierarchical levels of evidence schema for evaluating the status of biomarkers as surrogate endpoints [J].
Lassere, Marissa N. .
STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2008, 17 (03) :303-340
[19]  
Lijmer Jeroen G, 2009, Med Decis Making, V29, pE13, DOI 10.1177/0272989X09336144
[20]   Lost in translation: Obstacles to translational medicine [J].
Mankoff S.P. ;
Brander C. ;
Ferrone S. ;
Marincola F.M. .
Journal of Translational Medicine, 2 (1)