Effects of Seismicity Models and New Ground-Motion Prediction Equations on Seismic Hazard Assessment for Four Canadian Cities

被引:57
作者
Atkinson, Gail M. [1 ]
Goda, Katsuichiro [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Earth Sci, London, ON N6A 5B7, Canada
[2] Univ Bristol, Dept Civil Engn, Bristol BS8 1TR, Avon, England
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
EASTERN NORTH-AMERICA; CASCADIA SUBDUCTION ZONE; SOUTHWESTERN BRITISH-COLUMBIA; LOCAL MAGNITUDE CALIBRATION; MOMENT MAGNITUDE; ATTENUATION RELATIONS; WESTERN CANADA; IN-SLAB; EARTHQUAKES; FAULT;
D O I
10.1785/0120100093
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
Seismicity rates and ground-motion prediction equations (GMPEs) are the key uncertainties in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA). We explore the impact of new findings and knowledge from seismological and ground-motion studies on seismic hazard assessment for eastern and western Canada. Updated information includes the reevaluation of seismicity rates and their interpretation in terms of seismic source zones and the use of new GMPEs. We refer to our model as an interim updated seismic hazard model, as it does not treat all uncertainties comprehensively; rather, we address the impact of key uncertainties. Based on our updated interim seismic hazard model, uniform hazard spectra (UHS) at four major cities across Canada are obtained and compared with UHS in the current seismic hazard maps of Canada (2005/2010), which are based on a 1995 seismic hazard model developed by the Geological Survey of Canada. Sensitivity analysis highlights the significant impact of seismicity smoothing in low-to-moderate seismic regions (eastern Canada), while GMPEs are important for all regions. Moreover, our interim updated seismic hazard model can readily produce seismic hazard curves as well as seismic hazard deaggregation results for various site conditions and for multiple probability levels; this capability is essential for carrying out advanced earthquake engineering analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:176 / 189
页数:14
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   Probability and uncertainty in seismic hazard analysis [J].
Abrahamson, NA ;
Bommer, JJ .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2005, 21 (02) :603-607
[2]   Comparisons of the NGA ground-motion relations [J].
Abrahamson, Norman ;
Atkinson, Gail ;
Boore, David ;
Bozorgnia, Yousef ;
Campbell, Kenneth ;
Chiou, Brian ;
Idriss, I. M. ;
Silva, Walter ;
Youngs, Robert .
EARTHQUAKE SPECTRA, 2008, 24 (01) :45-66
[3]  
ADAMS J, 1989, GEOSCI CAN, V16, P3
[4]  
ADAMS J, 1995, 1995D GEOL SURV CAN
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Open-File 4459
[6]   Ground-motion prediction equations for eastern North America from a referenced empirical approach: Implications for epistemic uncertainty [J].
Atkinson, Gail M. .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2008, 98 (03) :1304-1318
[7]   Earthquake ground-motion prediction equations for eastern North America [J].
Atkinson, Gail M. ;
Boore, David M. .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2006, 96 (06) :2181-2205
[8]   Attenuation and Source Characteristics of the 23 June 2010 M 5.0 Val-des-Bois, Quebec, Earthquake [J].
Atkinson, Gail M. ;
Assatourians, Karen .
SEISMOLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 81 (05) :849-860
[9]   Predicted Ground Motions for Great Interface Earthquakes in the Cascadia Subduction Zone [J].
Atkinson, Gail M. ;
Macias, Miguel .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2009, 99 (03) :1552-1578
[10]   Ground motions for earthquakes in southwestern British Columbia and northwestern Washington: Crustal, in-slab, and offshore events [J].
Atkinson, GM .
BULLETIN OF THE SEISMOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2005, 95 (03) :1027-1044