Differences in public perceptions of geothermal energy based on EGS technology in Korea after the Pohang earthquake: National vs. local

被引:17
作者
Baek, Haein [1 ]
Chung, Ji-Bum [1 ]
Yun, Gi Woong [2 ]
机构
[1] Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol UNIST, Sch Urban & Environm Engn, UNIST Gil 50, Ulsan 689798, South Korea
[2] Univ Nevada, Reynolds Sch Journalism, 1664N Virginia St, Reno, NV 89557 USA
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Geothermal energy; Enhanced Geothermal System; Triggered earthquake; Public perception; Media content analysis; Framing; RENEWABLE ENERGY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WIND POWER; ACCEPTANCE; RISK; MEDIA; NIMBY; ELECTRICITY; OPPOSITION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121027
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigated the public perception differences about geothermal power generation at the national and local levels after the Pohang earthquake that occurred on November 15, 2017. The media content analysis results indicated that the previously positive media framing based on environment and technology drastically changed to a negative framing based on risk after the earthquake. The survey data showed that the geothermal energy perception of the local sample was significantly more negative than that of the national sample. Proximity to the epicenter of the earthquake was negatively correlated with the public preference of geothermal energy. The energy source preferences among local residents showed that they placed geothermal power plants and nuclear power plants in the same category. In terms of risk, Pohang residents seemed to associate geothermal power plants with nuclear power plants.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 72 条
[41]  
Kulish N., 2009, NEWYORK TIMES
[42]   Perception of Earthquake Risk in Taiwan: Effects of Gender and Past Earthquake Experience [J].
Kung, Yi-Wen ;
Chen, Sue-Huei .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2012, 32 (09) :1535-1546
[43]  
이상돈, 2013, [TUNNEL AND UNDERGROUND SPACE, 터널과 지하공간], V23, P572
[44]   Geothermal resource assessment in Korea [J].
Lee, Youngmin ;
Park, Sungho ;
Kim, Jongchan ;
Kim, Hyoung Chan ;
Koo, Min-Ho .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2010, 14 (08) :2392-2400
[45]   Three phases in the evolution of risk communication practice [J].
Leiss, W .
ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 1996, 545 :85-94
[46]  
Lombard M, 2002, HUM COMMUN RES, V28, P587, DOI 10.1093/hcr/28.4.587
[47]  
Luderer G, 2014, CLIMATIC CHANGE, V123, P427, DOI [10.1007/s10584-013-0924-z, 10.1007/s10584-013-0899-9]
[48]   Partisan probing and democratic decisionmaking: Rethinking the nimby syndrome [J].
McAvoy, GE .
POLICY STUDIES JOURNAL, 1998, 26 (02) :274-292
[49]   Public perceptions and acceptance of induced earthquakes related to energy development [J].
McComas, Katherine A. ;
Lu, Hang ;
Keranen, Katie M. ;
Furtney, Maria A. ;
Song, Hwansuck .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 99 :27-32
[50]   AGENDA-SETTING FUNCTION OF MASS MEDIA [J].
MCCOMBS, ME ;
SHAW, DL .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1972, 36 (02) :176-&