Differences in public perceptions of geothermal energy based on EGS technology in Korea after the Pohang earthquake: National vs. local

被引:17
作者
Baek, Haein [1 ]
Chung, Ji-Bum [1 ]
Yun, Gi Woong [2 ]
机构
[1] Ulsan Natl Inst Sci & Technol UNIST, Sch Urban & Environm Engn, UNIST Gil 50, Ulsan 689798, South Korea
[2] Univ Nevada, Reynolds Sch Journalism, 1664N Virginia St, Reno, NV 89557 USA
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Geothermal energy; Enhanced Geothermal System; Triggered earthquake; Public perception; Media content analysis; Framing; RENEWABLE ENERGY; CLIMATE-CHANGE; WIND POWER; ACCEPTANCE; RISK; MEDIA; NIMBY; ELECTRICITY; OPPOSITION; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121027
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study investigated the public perception differences about geothermal power generation at the national and local levels after the Pohang earthquake that occurred on November 15, 2017. The media content analysis results indicated that the previously positive media framing based on environment and technology drastically changed to a negative framing based on risk after the earthquake. The survey data showed that the geothermal energy perception of the local sample was significantly more negative than that of the national sample. Proximity to the epicenter of the earthquake was negatively correlated with the public preference of geothermal energy. The energy source preferences among local residents showed that they placed geothermal power plants and nuclear power plants in the same category. In terms of risk, Pohang residents seemed to associate geothermal power plants with nuclear power plants.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Geothermal technology: Trends and potential role in a sustainable future [J].
Anderson, Austin ;
Rezaie, Behnaz .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 248 :18-34
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Off J Eur Union, V5
[3]  
Asanuma H., 2005, P WORLD GEOTH C, P24
[4]  
Baek S.M., 2017, KYUNGHYANG NEWSPAPER
[5]   The 'social gap' in wind farm siting decisions: Explanations and policy responses [J].
Bell, D ;
Gray, T ;
Haggett, C .
ENVIRONMENTAL POLITICS, 2005, 14 (04) :460-477
[6]   Neither risky technology nor renewable electricity: Contested frames in the development of geothermal energy in Germany [J].
Benighaus, C. ;
Bleicher, A. .
ENERGY RESEARCH & SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2019, 47 :46-55
[7]   Public acceptance and preferences related to renewable energy and grid expansion policy: Empirical insights for Germany [J].
Bertsch, Valentin ;
Hall, Margeret ;
Weinhardt, Christof ;
Fichtner, Wolf .
ENERGY, 2016, 114 :465-477
[8]   Reporting on climate change: A computational analysis of US newspapers and sources of bias, 1997-2017 [J].
Bohr, Jeremiah .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2020, 61
[9]   The local impact of global climate change: reporting on landscape transformation and threatened identity in the English regional newspaper press [J].
Brown, Tim ;
Budd, Lucy ;
Bell, Morag ;
Rendell, Helen .
PUBLIC UNDERSTANDING OF SCIENCE, 2011, 20 (05) :658-673
[10]   Differences in Public Perceptions of Geothermal Energy Technology in Australia [J].
Carr-Cornish, Simone ;
Romanach, Lygia .
ENERGIES, 2014, 7 (03) :1555-1575