Arterial pressure-based cardiac output monitoring: a multicenter validation of the third-generation software in septic patients

被引:96
作者
De Backer, Daniel [1 ]
Marx, Gernot [2 ]
Tan, Andrew [3 ]
Junker, Christopher [4 ]
Van Nuffelen, Marc [1 ]
Huter, Lars [5 ]
Ching, Willy [3 ]
Michard, Frederic [6 ]
Vincent, Jean-Louis [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Libre Bruxelles, Dept Intens Care, Erasme Univ Hosp, B-1070 Brussels, Belgium
[2] Aachen Univ Hosp, Dept Surg Intens Care, D-52074 Aachen, Germany
[3] Queens Med Ctr, Intens Care Unit, Honolulu, HI 96813 USA
[4] Washington Univ, Med Ctr, Intens Care Unit, Washington, DC 20037 USA
[5] Jena Univ Hosp, D-07747 Jena, Germany
[6] Crit Care Europe, Edwards LifeSci, CH-1260 Nyon, Switzerland
关键词
Cardiac output; Monitoring; Non-invasive; Systemic vascular resistance; WAVE-FORM ANALYSIS; PULSE CONTOUR; BLOOD-PRESSURE; TRANSPULMONARY THERMODILUTION; AORTAS INVITRO; AGREEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s00134-010-2098-8
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Second-generation FloTrac software has been shown to reliably measure cardiac output (CO) in cardiac surgical patients. However, concerns have been raised regarding its accuracy in vasoplegic states. The aim of the present multicenter study was to investigate the accuracy of the third-generation software in patients with sepsis, particularly when total systemic vascular resistance (TSVR) is low. Fifty-eight septic patients were included in this prospective observational study in four university-affiliated ICUs. Reference CO was measured by bolus pulmonary thermodilution (iCO) using 3-5 cold saline boluses. Simultaneously, CO was computed from the arterial pressure curve recorded on a computer using the second-generation (COG2) and third-generation (COG3) FloTrac software. CO was also measured by semi-continuous pulmonary thermodilution (CCO). A total of 401 simultaneous measurements of iCO, COG2, COG3, and CCO were recorded. The mean (95%CI) biases between COG2 and iCO, COG3 and iCO, and CCO and iCO were -10 (-15 to -5)% [-0.8 (-1.1 to -0.4) L/min], 0 (-4 to 4)% [0 (-0.3 to 0.3) L/min], and 9 (6-13)% [0.7 (0.5-1.0) L/min], respectively. The percentage errors were 29 (20-37)% for COG2, 30 (24-37)% for COG3, and 28 (22-34)% for CCO. The difference between iCO and COG2 was significantly correlated with TSVR (r (2) = 0.37, p < 0.0001). A very weak (r (2) = 0.05) relationship was also observed for the difference between iCO and COG3. In patients with sepsis, the third-generation FloTrac software is more accurate, as precise, and less influenced by TSVR than the second-generation software.
引用
收藏
页码:233 / 240
页数:8
相关论文
共 33 条
[31]   Continuous cardiac output by pulse contour analysis? [J].
van Lieshout, JJ ;
Wesseling, KH .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2001, 86 (04) :467-469
[32]   Effects of vasodilation on cardiac output measured by PulseCO™ [J].
Yamashita K. ;
Nishiyama T. ;
Yokoyama T. ;
Abe H. ;
Manabe M. .
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing, 2007, 21 (6) :335-339
[33]   The effects of vasodilation on cardiac output measured by PiCCO [J].
Yamashita, Koichi ;
Nishiyama, Tomoki ;
Yokoyama, Takeshi ;
Abe, Hidehiro ;
Manabe, Masanobu .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2008, 22 (05) :688-692