Titanium mini locking plate with trans-osseous sutures for the treatment of humeral greater tuberosity fracture osteosynthesis versus PHILOS: a retrospective view

被引:7
作者
Xue, Gang [1 ]
Chahal, Kapil [1 ]
Lim, Thou [2 ]
Hu, Siyuan [1 ]
Li, Shaohua [1 ]
Liu, Jie [1 ]
机构
[1] Tongji Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 10, Dept Orthopaed, 301 Middle Yanchang Rd, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[2] Jiaotong Univ, Shanghai Peoples Hosp 6, Dept Orthopaed, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
Humerus; Fracture; Greater tuberosity fracture; Mini locking plate; Trans-osseous sutures; PHILOS; Gang Xue and Kapil Chahal contributed equally to this study; PROXIMAL HUMERUS; INTERNAL-FIXATION; OPEN REDUCTION; MULTICENTER;
D O I
10.1007/s00264-018-3823-0
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose Greater tuberosity fractures (GTFs) account for 17 to 21% of proximal humerus fractures, most of these fractures are treated conservatively, but treatment for displaced fractures is still controversial. The aim of this study is to compare intra-operative clinical conditions and post-operative outcomes when displaced GTFs are treated with either proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) or mini locking plate with trans-osseous sutures. Methods This is a retrospective study conducted in Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital. A total of 60 patients (22 males and 38 females) with displaced humeral GTF between May 2013 and March 2017 were included, of whom 43 underwent PHILOS implant treatment and 17 underwent titanium mini plate implant with trans-osseous suture treatment. Intra-operative (incision size, intra-operative blood loss, operative duration) and postoperative (Constant-Murley score (CMS) and implant cost) variables were recorded for the comparison. Results Mini locking plate with trans-osseous sutures shows better results. Operative duration (PHILOS mean 77.0 minutes vs mean 63.7 minutes, p value <0.05), blood loss during surgery (PHILOS mean 111.5 vs 66.5 ml, p value <0.05), incision size (PHILOS mean 7.2 vs 4.6 cm, p value <0.05), CMS (PHILOS mean 81.0 vs 87.3, p value <0.05), and implant costs (PHILOS mean 26,192.6 renminbi (RMB) vs mean 21,358.8 RMB, p value <0.05). On the other hand, 9.30% of impingement in the PHILOS group was observed to have no complications compared to the mini locking plate group. Conclusions Mini locking plate with trans-osseous sutures shows better efficacy in reducing the incision size, operative duration, intraoperative blood loss, and implant cost and in improving CMS. No complication was found with its use. Our data can provide rationale and inform sample- size calculations for such studies. Larger, control studies are needed for better understanding.
引用
收藏
页码:2467 / 2473
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
  • [1] Bahrs C, 2014, INT ORTHOP, V38, P1697, DOI 10.1007/s00264-014-2362-6
  • [2] Review of fixation techniques for the four-part fractured proximal humerus in hemiarthroplasty
    Baumgartner, Daniel
    Nolan, Betsy M.
    Mathys, Robert
    Lorenzetti, Silvio Rene
    Stuessi, Edgar
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2011, 6
  • [3] Internal fixation of proximal humeral fractures with a locking compression plate -: A retrospective evaluation of 72 patients followed for a minimum of 1 year
    Björkenheim, JM
    Pajarinen, J
    Savolainen, V
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 2004, 75 (06): : 741 - 745
  • [4] Mid-term results of a less-invasive locking plate fixation method for proximal humeral fractures: a prospective observational study
    Bockmann, Benjamin
    Buecking, Benjamin
    Franz, Daniel
    Zettl, Ralph
    Ruchholtz, Steffen
    Mohr, Juliane
    [J]. BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2015, 16
  • [5] Locking plate osteosynthesis in displaced 4-part fractures of the proximal humerus A systematic review of benefits and harms
    Brorson, Stig
    Frich, Lars H.
    Winther, Annika
    Hrobjartsson, Asbjorn
    [J]. ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA, 2011, 82 (04) : 475 - 481
  • [6] Locking Plate Fixation for Proximal Humerus Fractures
    Burke, Neil G.
    Kennedy, Jim
    Green, Connor
    Dodds, Michael K.
    Mullett, Hannan
    [J]. ORTHOPEDICS, 2012, 35 (02) : E250 - E254
  • [7] The amount of humeral head impaction of proximal humeral fractures fixed with the Humerusblock device
    Carbone, Stefano
    Moroder, Philipp
    Arceri, Valerio
    Postacchini, Roberto
    Gumina, Stefano
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (07) : 1451 - 1459
  • [8] Classifications in Brief: The Neer Classification for Proximal Humerus Fractures
    Carofino, Bradley C.
    Leopold, Seth S.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2013, 471 (01) : 39 - 43
  • [9] Cornell C, 2011, HSS J, V7, P164, DOI DOI 10.1007/S11420-010-9194-8
  • [10] EPIDEMIOLOGICAL PROFILE OF PATIENTS WITH PROXIMAL HUMERUS FRACTURE TREATED AT HOSPITAL SAO PAULO, BRAZIL
    Cortes de Oliveira, Ana Paula
    Mestieri, Mariana Christovam
    Baldocchi Pontin, Jose Carlos
    [J]. ACTA ORTOPEDICA BRASILEIRA, 2015, 23 (05): : 271 - 274