Proximal femoral nails anti-rotation versus dynamic hip screws for treatment of stable intertrochanteric femur fractures: an outcome analyses with a minimum 4 years of follow-up

被引:30
作者
Yu, Weiguang [2 ]
Zhang, Xinchao [1 ]
Zhu, Xingfei [1 ]
Yu, Zuochong [1 ]
Xu, Yinfeng [2 ]
Zha, Guoqing [2 ]
Hu, Jun [2 ]
Yi, Jianhua [2 ]
Liu, Yunjiang [2 ]
机构
[1] Fudan Univ, Jinshan Hosp, Dept Orthopaed, Longhang Rd 1508, Shanghai 201508, Peoples R China
[2] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Dept Orthoped, Huangpu East Rd 183, Guangzhou 510700, Guangdong, Peoples R China
关键词
Intertrochanteric fracture; Complication; Proximal femoral nail anti-rotation; Dynamic hip screw; Harris hip score; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; GAMMA NAILS; METAANALYSIS; ANTIROTATION; COMPRESSION; FIXATION; REOPERATION; PLATES; WALL;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-016-1079-7
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Dynamic hip screws (DHSs) and proximal femoral nails anti-rotation (PFNAs) are well-documented implants for stable intertrochanteric femur fractures(IFFs); however, there is no consensus regarding which type of implant is the better option for stable IFFs. This study aimed to compare DHSs with PFNAs in the management of stable intertrochanteric fractures. Methods: A retrospective study was performed in our institution. Between June, 2005 and November, 2015, 267 patients (267 hips) with stable IFFs (AO/OTA Type 3.1A1) were treated with a DHS or a PFNA. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were designed to focus on isolated stable IFFs in ambulatory patients. Follow-up was undertaken at 1, 3, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48 postoperative months, and at final follow-up. Radiograph outcomes were obtained at all visits. The primary outcome measure was re-operation rate. The secondary outcome was patient function, evaluated using Harris hip score (HHS). Tertiary outcomes included: intra-and post-operative orthopaedic complications. Results: Two hundred twenty two patients (110 in the PFNA group and 112 in the DHS group) were evaluated with a mean follow-up period of 53 months (range, 48-60 months). There was an increased risk of reoperation after DHS in one-year follow-up: 0 % and 5.4 % for PFNA and DHS, respectively (P = 0.029). The difference persisted with time: 6.4 % and 13.4 % at last follow-up (P < 0.05). There are statistical differences in postoperative HHS at 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 36, 48 months postoperatively and at final follow-up. No statistical differences in medical complications was observed between the two groups. The orthopaedic complications were more in the DHS group (n = 42) compared with the PFNA group (n = 18) (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Compared with PFNA device, DHS device might not be the preferred implant for stable intertrochanteric femur fractures.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Prospective randomised controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus a sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur [J].
Aktselis, Ioannis ;
Kokoroghiannis, Constantine ;
Fragkomichalos, Evaggelos ;
Koundis, Georgios ;
Deligeorgis, Anastasios ;
Daskalakis, Emmanouil ;
Vlamis, John ;
Papaioannou, Nikolaos .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2014, 38 (01) :155-161
[2]   Dynamic hip screws versus proximal femoral nails for intertrochanteric fractures [J].
Avakian, Zorik ;
Shiraev, Timothy ;
Lam, Lawrence ;
Hope, Nigel .
ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2012, 82 (1-2) :56-59
[3]   Gamma Nails Revisited: Gamma Nails Versus Compression Hip Screws in the Management of Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Hip: A Meta-Analysis [J].
Bhandari, Mohit ;
Schemitsch, Emil ;
Joensson, Anders ;
Zlowodzki, Michael ;
Haidukewych, George J. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA, 2009, 23 (06) :460-464
[4]   Extramedullary Compared with Intramedullary Implants for Intertrochanteric Hip Fractures Thirty-Day Outcomes of 4432 Procedures from the ACS NSQIP Database [J].
Bohl, Daniel D. ;
Basques, Bryce A. ;
Golinvaux, Nicholas S. ;
Miller, Christopher P. ;
Baumgaertner, Michael R. ;
Grauer, Jonathan N. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2014, 96A (22) :1871-1877
[5]   Proximal femoral locking plate versus dynamic hip screw for unstable intertrochanteric femoral fractures [J].
Dhamangaonkar, Anoop C. ;
Joshi, Deepak ;
Goregaonkar, Arvind B. ;
Tawari, Akhil A. .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2013, 21 (03) :317-322
[6]   Integrity of the lateral femoral wall in intertrochanteric hip fractures: An important predictor of a reoperation [J].
Gotfried, Yechiel .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2007, 89A (11) :2552-2553
[7]   Comments on "Anti-rotation proximal femoral nail versus dynamic hip screw for intertrochanteric fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies" of L. Shen, Y. Zhang, Y. Shen, Z. Cui published in Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2013;99:377-83 [J].
Han, F-S ;
Guo, F-X ;
Zeng, X-T ;
Zhang, B. ;
Ping, J. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2014, 100 (02) :259-260
[8]   Comparison of soft-tissue serum markers in stable intertrochanteric fracture: Dynamic hip screw versus proximal femoral nail-A preliminary study [J].
Hong, Jae-Young ;
Suh, Seung-Woo ;
Park, Jung-Ho ;
Shin, Young-Soo ;
Yoon, Jung-Ro ;
Yang, Jae-Hyuk .
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED, 2011, 42 (02) :204-208
[9]   Are short femoral nails superior to the sliding hip screw? A meta-analysis of 24 studies involving 3,279 fractures [J].
Jones, HW ;
Johnston, P ;
Parker, M .
INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2006, 30 (02) :69-78
[10]  
Li M, 2014, J ORTHOP SURG RES, P9