Consumer Preference for Yogurt Packaging Design Using Conjoint Analysis

被引:24
作者
Wang, Fa [1 ]
Wang, Haifeng [2 ]
Cho, Joung Hyung [2 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Vocat Inst Architectural Technol, Sch Art Design, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
[2] Pukyong Natl Univ, Dept Marine Design Convergence Engn, Busan 48513, South Korea
关键词
package design; consumer preferences; conjoint analysis; yogurt packaging; consumer demand; INFORMATION; PERCEPTION; LABELS;
D O I
10.3390/su14063463
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
With the growing consumption market of yogurt products, the continuous innovation of packaging design has become the major means of enterprise marketing for fast-moving consumer goods. Because different combinations of packaging design elements affect the consumers in different ways, the contradiction between the product packaging design and consumer demand has impacted the further development of these products' marketing. To explore the relationship between the constituent elements of yogurt packaging design and consumer preferences, four kinds of factors to the purchased products' attributes were selected from the packaging design, including the graphics, packaging colors, packaging shapes and label texts. The consumers' preferences for different attributes of yogurt packaging design were quantitatively evaluated by the Conjoint Analysis Method (CAM). Consumers showed the strongest preference for yogurt packaging shapes (39.017%), and were the most satisfied with the concrete graphics of cool colors (31.330%); the level combination of attributes most preferred by consumers is that of concrete graphics, cool colors, gable-top boxes and simple labels. The packaging design satisfying consumer preferences gave rise to positive purchase attitudes. Such research results facilitated the understanding of the consumption market and provided the theoretical support necessary for the development of yogurt packaging design to match the consumers' preferences.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Abdullah M., 2013, International Journal of Humanities and Management Sciences (IJHMS), V1, P285
[2]  
Ahmad A., 2015, International Journal of Marketing Studies, V7/6, DOI DOI 10.5539/IJMS.V7N6P92
[3]  
Arnheim R., 2020, VISUAL THINKING, P175
[4]   Packaging Design: General Framework and Research Agenda [J].
Azzi, A. ;
Battini, D. ;
Persona, A. ;
Sgarbossa, F. .
PACKAGING TECHNOLOGY AND SCIENCE, 2012, 25 (08) :435-456
[5]   What will it take to adopt smart glasses: A consumer choice based review? [J].
Basoglu, Nuri ;
Ok, Ali Emre ;
Daim, Tugrul U. .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2017, 50 :50-56
[6]   Food packaging design and consumer perception of the product quality, safety, healthiness and preference [J].
Bou-Mitri, Christelle ;
Abdessater, Marilyn ;
Zgheib, Hani ;
Akiki, Zeina .
NUTRITION & FOOD SCIENCE, 2021, 51 (01) :71-86
[7]  
Brunazzi G., 2014, SURFACE MATTERS AEST, P7
[8]   A conjoint analysis to consumer choice in Brazil: Defining device attributes for recognizing customized foods characteristics [J].
Calegari, L. P. ;
Barbosa, J. ;
Marodin, G. A. ;
Fettermann, D. C. .
FOOD RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL, 2018, 109 :1-13
[9]   Product differentiation and brand building: a hedonic analysis of yogurt price in China [J].
Chen, Bo ;
Zhang, Xiaoheng ;
Zhou, Qingjie .
INTERNATIONAL FOOD AND AGRIBUSINESS MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2021, 24 (03) :481-498
[10]   Shape Matters: Package Shape Informs Brand Status Categorization and Brand Choice [J].
Chen, Huan ;
Pang, Jun ;
Koo, Minkyung ;
Patrick, Vanessa M. .
JOURNAL OF RETAILING, 2020, 96 (02) :266-281