Estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive and her-2-negative breast cancer might no longer be classified as hormone receptor-positive breast cancer

被引:8
作者
Zheng, Hongjuan [1 ]
Ge, Chenyang [2 ]
Lin, Haiping [3 ]
Wu, Lunpo [4 ,5 ]
Wang, Qinghua [1 ]
Zhou, Shishi [1 ]
Tang, Wanfen [1 ]
Zhang, Xia [1 ]
Jin, Xiayun [1 ]
Xu, Xifeng [1 ]
Hong, Zhongwu [6 ]
Fu, Jianfei [1 ]
Du, Jinlin [2 ]
机构
[1] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Jinhua Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Sch Med, 351 Mingyue Rd, Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Jinhua Hosp, Dept Colorectal Surg, Sch Med, 351 Mingyue Rd, Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Jinhua Hosp, Dept Hepatobiliary Surg, Sch Med, Jinhua, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Zhejiang Univ, Dept Gastroenterol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Sch Med, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[5] Zhejiang Univ, Inst Gastroenterol, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[6] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Jinhua Hosp, Dept Oncol, Sch Med, Jinhua 321000, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
关键词
Breast cancer; sPR positive; The annual hazard rate of death; Cancer-specific survival; DISEASE-FREE INTERVAL; PROGESTERONE-RECEPTORS; NEOADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; MESSENGER-RNA; TUMOR; EXPRESSION; SUBTYPES; PREDICTION; TAMOXIFEN; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1007/s10147-022-02158-0
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background The single progesterone receptor (PR)-positive phenotype (estrogen receptor (ER)-/PR + , sPR positive) is an infrequent and independent biological entity. However, the prognosis of patients with sPR-positive and her-2-negative phenotype is still controversial, and it is not always easy to decide treatment strategies for them. Methods Patients during 2010-2014 were identified from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to evaluate cancer-specific survival (CSS). The propensity score matching (PSM) method was used to balance differences of characteristics in groups. The Life-Table method was used to calculate 5-year CSS rates and the annual hazard rate of death (HRD). Results A total of 97,527 patients were included, and only 745 (0.76%) patients were sPR-positive phenotype. The majority of sPR-positive breast cancer were basal-like subtype. Survival analysis showed that the sPR-positive breast cancer had similar prognosis comparing to double hormonal receptor-negative (ER-/PR-, dHoR-negative) breast cancer, and had the highest HRD during the initial 1-2 years of follow-up, then maintained the HRD of almost zero during the late years of follow-up. Conclusions The patients with sPR-positive and her-2-negative breast cancer, similar to dHoR-negative breast cancer, had a worse survival, and could benefit from chemotherapy significantly. However, the escalating endocrine therapy was not recommended for sPR-positive patients. The patients with sPR positive should be excluded from future clinical trials concerning endocrine therapy.
引用
收藏
页码:1145 / 1153
页数:9
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   HORMONE RECEPTORS AS PROGNOSTIC FACTORS IN FEMALE BREAST-CANCER [J].
AALTOMAA, S ;
LIPPONEN, P ;
ESKELINEN, M ;
KOSMA, VM ;
MARIN, S ;
ALHAVA, E ;
SYRJANEN, K .
ANNALS OF MEDICINE, 1991, 23 (06) :643-648
[2]  
ALANKO A, 1985, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V56, P1696, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19851001)56:7<1696::AID-CNCR2820560738>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-N
[4]   Progesterone receptor status significantly improves outcome prediction over estrogen receptor status alone for adjuvant endocrine therapy in two large breast cancer databases [J].
Bardou, VJ ;
Arpino, G ;
Elledge, RM ;
Osborne, CK ;
Clark, GM .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 21 (10) :1973-1979
[5]   Estrogen receptor-negative/progesterone receptor-positive Evsa-T mammary tumor cells: a model for assessing the biological property of this peculiar phenotype of breast cancers [J].
Borras, M ;
Lacroix, M ;
Legros, N ;
Leclercq, G .
CANCER LETTERS, 1997, 120 (01) :23-30
[6]   The triple negative paradox: Primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes [J].
Carey, Lisa A. ;
Dees, E. Claire ;
Sawyer, Lynda ;
Gatti, Lisa ;
Moore, Dominic T. ;
Collichio, Frances ;
Ollila, David W. ;
Sartor, Carolyn I. ;
Graham, Mark L. ;
Perou, Charles M. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2007, 13 (08) :2329-2334
[7]   Outcomes of Estrogen Receptor Negative and Progesterone Receptor Positive Breast Cancer [J].
Chan, Melissa ;
Chang, Martin C. ;
Gonzalez, Rosa ;
Lategan, Belinda ;
del Barco, Elvira ;
Vera-Badillo, Francisco ;
Quesada, Paula ;
Goldstein, Robyn ;
Cruz, Ignacio ;
Ocana, Alberto ;
Cruz, Juan J. ;
Amir, Eitan .
PLOS ONE, 2015, 10 (07)
[8]  
CHEVALLIER B, 1988, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V62, P2517, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19881215)62:12<2517::AID-CNCR2820621211>3.0.CO
[9]  
2-9
[10]   A 50-Gene Intrinsic Subtype Classifier for Prognosis and Prediction of Benefit from Adjuvant Tamoxifen [J].
Chia, Stephen K. ;
Bramwell, Vivien H. ;
Tu, Dongsheng ;
Shepherd, Lois E. ;
Jiang, Shan ;
Vickery, Tammi ;
Mardis, Elaine ;
Leung, Samuel ;
Ung, Karen ;
Pritchard, Kathleen I. ;
Parker, Joel S. ;
Bernard, Philip S. ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Ellis, Matthew J. ;
Nielsen, Torsten O. .
CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 18 (16) :4465-4472