Performance of BD MAX Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Assay without Enrichment for the Detection of GBS

被引:6
作者
Um, Sewhan [1 ]
Her, Jaeyoung [1 ]
Kim, Si Hyun [2 ]
Song, Sae Am [3 ]
Kim, Young Nam [4 ]
Shin, Jeong Hwan [3 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Inje Univ, Coll Med, Busan, South Korea
[2] Semyung Univ, Dept Clin Lab Sci, Jecheon, South Korea
[3] Inje Univ, Dept Lab Med, Coll Med, Busan, South Korea
[4] Inje Univ, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Coll Med, Busan, South Korea
[5] Inje Univ, Paik Inst Clin Res, Coll Med, Busan, South Korea
关键词
Group B streptococcus; BD Max; Performance; Sensitivity; Specificity; SPECIMENS;
D O I
10.3343/alm.2022.42.4.478
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Group B streptococcus (GBS) is an important pathogen causing neonatal early-onset disease. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of BD Max GBS assay (Becton Dickinson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) without enrichment (direct BDM) for detecting GBS using vaginal and rectal specimens in comparison with culture. In total, 716 specimens collected from 358 pregnant women between June 2018 and May 2020 were included in this study. Bacterial culture was performed using ChromID Strep B agar (bioMerieux, Marcy-l'Etoile, France), and species identification results were confirmed using the VITEK-MS system (bioMerieux). The sensitivity of direct BDM for vaginal and rectal specimens was 75.0% and 100%, respectively. Thirteen specimens showed discrepant results: 10 false-negative results in the vaginal specimens and three false-positive results in the rectal specimens. The overall agreement between direct BDM and culture was 98.9% (354/358). The final sensitivity and specificity of direct BDM were 98.5% and 99.0%, respectively. Discrepant results-one false-negative and three false-positives-were obtained for four specimens. Direct BDM shows a good diagnostic performance and will be useful for GBS screening within a few hours.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 481
页数:4
相关论文
共 17 条
  • [1] Diagnosis and Management of Group B Streptococcus in Pregnancy
    Ahmadzia, Homa K.
    Heine, R. Phillips
    [J]. OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2014, 41 (04) : 629 - +
  • [2] Comparison of BD MAX GBS and GenomEra GBS assays for rapid intrapartum PCR detection of vaginal carriage of group B streptococci
    Andreasen, Trine
    Moller, Jens Kjolseth
    Khalil, Mohammed Rohi
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (04):
  • [4] Comparison of the Panther Fusion and BD MAX Group B Streptococcus (GBS) Assays for Detection of GBS in Prenatal Screening Specimens
    Berry, Gregory J.
    Zhang, Fan
    Manji, Ryhana
    Juretschko, Stefan
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2019, 57 (11)
  • [5] PREVENTION OF EARLY-ONSET NEONATAL GROUP-B STREPTOCOCCAL DISEASE WITH SELECTIVE INTRAPARTUM CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS
    BOYER, KM
    GOTOFF, SP
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1986, 314 (26) : 1665 - 1669
  • [6] Antepartum Screening for Group B Streptococcus by Three FDA-Cleared Molecular Tests and Effect of Shortened Enrichment Culture on Molecular Detection Rates
    Couturier, Brianne A.
    Weight, Trent
    Elmer, Haley
    Schlaberg, Robert
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2014, 52 (09) : 3429 - 3432
  • [7] Rapid detection of Group B streptococcus directly from vaginal-rectal specimens using liquid swabs and the BD Max GBS assay
    Ellem, J. A.
    Kovacevic, D.
    Olma, T.
    Chen, S. C. -A.
    [J]. CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTION, 2017, 23 (12) : 948 - 951
  • [8] Intrapartum PCR-assay for detection of Group B Streptococci (GBS)
    Helmig, Rikke B.
    Gertsen, Jan B.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY-X, 2019, 4
  • [9] Intrapartum PCR assay versus antepartum culture for assessment of vaginal carriage of group B streptococci in a Danish cohort at birth
    Khalil, Mohammed Rohi
    Uldbjerg, Niels
    Thorsen, Poul Bak
    Moller, Jens Kjolseth
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (07):
  • [10] Screening pregnant women for group B streptococcal colonization
    Madani, TA
    Harding, GK
    Helewa, M
    Alfa, MJ
    [J]. INFECTION, 1998, 26 (05) : 288 - 291