Comparative study of the mechanical behaviour of a cyanoacrylate and a bioadhesive

被引:15
作者
Páez, JMG
Herrero, EJ
Rocha, A
Maestro, M
Castillo-Olivares, JL
机构
[1] Clin Puerto Hierro, Serv Cirugia Expt, Madrid 28035, Spain
[2] Clin Puerto Hierro, Serv Bioestadist, Madrid 28035, Spain
[3] Escuela Tecn Super Ingn Ind, Dept Mecan Estructural & Resistencia Mat, Madrid, Spain
关键词
D O I
10.1023/B:JMSM.0000011810.12031.c6
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
We compared the mechanical resistance of 18 samples of calf pericardium bonded with a 100 mm(2) overlap, by two types of glues: a cyanoacrylate (Loctite 4011) and a bioadhesive (BioGlue). Comparative tensile testing was also carried out in 40 paired samples, 20 bonded with the cyanoacrylate and 20 unbonded controls. The findings at rupture showed a greater resistance of the calf pericardium glued with cyanoacrylate, with a mean tensile strength of 0.15 MPa vs. 0.04 MPa for the biological glue (p=0.000). They also demonstrated a loss of resistance of the samples bonded with cyanoacrylate when compared with that of the unbonded other halves of the pairs: 0.20 MPa and 0.27 MPa vs. 19.47 MPa and 24.44 MPa (p<0.001). The method of selection by means of paired samples made it possible to establish the equations that relate the stress and strain, or deformation, with excellent coefficients of determination (R-2). These equations demonstrate the marked elastic behaviour of the bonded samples. Moreover, these findings show the cyanoacrylate to be superior to the biological glue, leading to the examination of the compatibility, inalterability over time and mechanical behaviour of the cyanoacrylate in sutured samples, as well as the study of the anisotropy of the biomaterial when bonded with a bioadhesive. (C) 2004 Kluwer Academic Publishers.
引用
收藏
页码:109 / 115
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Late complications of tissue glues in aortic surgery [J].
Bingley, JA ;
Gardner, MAH ;
Stafford, EG ;
Mau, TK ;
Pohlner, PG ;
Tam, RKW ;
Jalali, H ;
Tesar, PJ ;
O'Brien, MF .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 2000, 69 (06) :1764-1768
[2]  
Braile DM, 1998, J HEART VALVE DIS, V7, P202
[3]  
Carrera San Martin A., 1993, Biomaterials, V14, P76, DOI 10.1016/0142-9612(93)90079-H
[4]   Viscoelasticity of dynamically fixed bioprosthetic valves .2. Effect of glutaraldehyde concentration [J].
Duncan, AC ;
Boughner, D ;
Vesely, I .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 1997, 113 (02) :302-310
[5]   BIOLOGICAL VALVES BEYOND 15 YEARS - THE WESSEX EXPERIENCE [J].
EDWARDS, TJ ;
LIVESEY, SA ;
SIMPSON, IA ;
MONRO, JL ;
ROSS, JK .
ANNALS OF THORACIC SURGERY, 1995, 60 (02) :S211-S215
[6]  
GONSALBEZ J, 1996, SCAND J THORAC CAR S, V44
[7]  
Gould P. L., 1973, Computers and Structures, V3, P377, DOI 10.1016/0045-7949(73)90024-2
[8]  
Greene D, 1999, Arch Facial Plast Surg, V1, P292, DOI 10.1001/archfaci.1.4.292
[9]  
HARIZA F, 1996, J HEART VALVE DIS, V5, P35
[10]  
Hiester ED, 1998, J BIOMED MATER RES, V39, P215, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199802)39:2<215::AID-JBM7>3.0.CO