Effect of Early Steroid Withdrawal on Posttransplant Diabetes Among Kidney Transplant Recipients Differs by Recipient Age

被引:9
作者
Ahn, JiYoon B. [1 ,2 ]
Bae, Sunjae [1 ,2 ]
Schnitzler, Mark [3 ]
Hess, Gregory P. [4 ]
Lentine, Krista L. [3 ]
Segev, Dorry L. [1 ,2 ]
McAdams-DeMarco, Mara A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Dept Surg, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Bloomberg Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Baltimore, MD USA
[3] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Ctr Abdominal Transplantat, St Louis, MO USA
[4] Drexel Univ, Coll Med, Dept Emergency Med, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
RENAL-TRANSPLANTATION; LONG-TERM; MYCOPHENOLATE-MOFETIL; MULTIPLE IMPUTATION; RISK-FACTORS; MELLITUS; TACROLIMUS; SURVIVAL; THERAPY; IMMUNOSUPPRESSION;
D O I
10.1097/TXD.0000000000001260
中图分类号
R3 [基础医学]; R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1001 ; 1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background. Posttransplant diabetes (PTD), a major complication after kidney transplantation (KT), is often attributable to immunosuppression. The risk of PTD may increase with more potent steroid maintenance and older recipient age. Methods. Using United States Renal Data System data, we studied 12 488 adult first-time KT recipients (2010-2015) with no known pre-KT diabetes. We compared the risk of PTD among recipients who underwent early steroid withdrawal (ESW) versus continued steroid maintenance (CSM) using Cox regression with inverse probability weighting to adjust for confounding. We tested whether the risk of PTD resulting from ESW differed by recipient age (18-29, 30-54, and >= 55 y). Results. Of 12 488, 28.3% recipients received ESW. The incidence rate for PTD was 13 per 100 person-y and lower among recipients who received ESW (11 per 100 person-y in ESW; 14 per 100 person-y in CSM). Overall, ESW was associated with lower risk of PTD compared with CSM (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] = (0.72)0.79(0.86)), but the risk differed by recipient age (P-interaction = 0.09 for comparison between recipients aged 18-29 and those aged 30-54; P-interaction = 0.01 for comparison between recipients aged 18-29 and those aged >= 55). ESW was associated with lower risk of PTD among recipients aged >= 55 (aHR = (0.62)0.71(0.81)) and those aged 30-54 (aHR = (0.73)0.83(0.95)), but not among recipients aged 18-29 (aHR = (0.81)1.18(1.72)). Although recipients who received ESW had a higher risk of acute rejection across the age groups (adjusted odds ratio = (1.01)1.17(1.34)), recipients with no PTD had a lower risk of mortality (aHR = (0.58)0.66(0.74)). Conclusions. The beneficial association of ESW with decreased PTD was more pronounced among recipients aged >= 55, supporting an age-specific assessment of the risk-benefit balance regarding ESW.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Early Steroid Withdrawal in Deceased-Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients with Delayed Graft Function [J].
Bae, Sunjae ;
Wang, Jacqueline M. Garonzik ;
Massie, Allan B. ;
Jackson, Kyle R. ;
McAdams-DeMarco, Mara A. ;
Brennan, Daniel C. ;
Lentine, Krista L. ;
Coresh, Josef ;
Segev, Dorry L. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2020, 31 (01) :175-185
[2]   Undiagnosed Diabetes in Kidney Transplant Candidates: A Case-Finding Strategy [J].
Bergrem, Henrik Andreas ;
Valderhaug, Tone Gretland ;
Hartmann, Anders ;
Hjelmesaeth, Joran ;
Leivestad, Torbjorn ;
Bergrem, Harald ;
Jenssen, Trond .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2010, 5 (04) :616-622
[3]   The role of tacrolimus in renal transplantation [J].
Bowman, Lyndsey J. ;
Brennan, Daniel C. .
EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2008, 9 (04) :635-643
[4]   Diabetes prevalence and socioeconomic status: a population based study showing increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus in deprived areas [J].
Connolly, V ;
Unwin, N ;
Sherriff, P ;
Bilous, R ;
Kelly, W .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2000, 54 (03) :173-177
[5]   Patient survival after renal transplantation: IV. Impact of post-transplant diabetes [J].
Cosio, FG ;
Pesavento, TE ;
Kim, S ;
Osei, K ;
Henry, M ;
Ferguson, RM .
KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL, 2002, 62 (04) :1440-1446
[6]   New-onset diabetes after transplantation: 2003 International Consensus Guidelines [J].
Davidson, J ;
Wilkinson, A ;
Dantal, J ;
Dotta, F ;
Haller, H ;
Hernández, D ;
Kasiske, BL ;
Kiberd, B ;
Krentz, A ;
Legendre, C ;
Marchetti, P ;
Markell, M ;
van der Woude, FJ ;
Wheeler, DC .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 75 (10) :SS3-SS24
[7]   New-onset diabetes after transplantation 2003 international consensus guidelines - An endocrinologist's view [J].
Davidson, JA ;
Wilkinson, A .
DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (03) :805-812
[8]   Risk factors and consequences of post-transplant diabetes mellitus [J].
Demirci, Meltem Sezis ;
Toz, Huseyin ;
Yilmaz, Filiz ;
Ertilav, Muhittin ;
Asci, Gulay ;
Ozkahya, Mehmet ;
Zeytinoglu, Aysin ;
Nart, Deniz ;
Ok, Ercan .
CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2010, 24 (05) :E170-E177
[9]   Diabetes mellitus in transplantation - Introduction [J].
Dubernard, JM ;
Frei, U .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2001, 33 (5A) :1S-2S
[10]   Post-transplant diabetes mellitus - Risk reduction strategies in the elderly [J].
Duclos, Alain ;
Flechner, Lawrence M. ;
Faiman, Charles ;
Flechner, Stuart M. .
DRUGS & AGING, 2006, 23 (10) :781-793