Effect of focused protocol on reducing radiation dose for children who require computed tomography for suspected appendicitis

被引:5
|
作者
Roberts, Suzanne [1 ]
Goldwasser, Bernard [2 ]
Nixon, Abigail F. [1 ]
Borkar, Deeksha [3 ]
Brookman, Max [4 ]
Fox, Carolyn E. [5 ]
Rosenfeld, Cyril [6 ]
Meltzer, James A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Jacobi Med Ctr, Div Emergency Med, Dept Pediat, Bronx, NY 10461 USA
[2] Jacobi Med Ctr, Div Pediat, Dept Radiol, Bronx, NY USA
[3] Univ Minnesota, Dept Pediat, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[4] Jacobi Med Ctr, Dept Pediat, Bronx, NY USA
[5] Oregon Hlth & Sci Univ, Div Pediat, Dept Emergency Med, Portand, OR USA
[6] Jacobi Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Bronx, NY USA
关键词
Appendicitis; Focused; Limited; Computed tomography; Abdominal pain; Right lower quadrant; Children; Radiation; CT; CANCER; RISKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2021.07.005
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Despite efforts to incorporate ultrasound into the evaluation of children for appendicitis, computed tomography (CT) is often used to aid in its diagnosis. CT scans, however, expose children to a considerable amount of radiation. In 2017, our institution began using a height-based Focused CT protocol for children with suspected appendicitis in need of CT. Objective: To compare the radiation dose received by children with suspected appendicitis who underwent a Standard Cr of the abdomen and pelvis (CTAP) with that of a Focused CT. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of children <18 years who underwent a CT scan for suspected appendicitis (2014-2020). We included all patients whose indication for CT was "appendicitis" or "right lower quadrant pain" and excluded those whose Cr scan record lacked a radiation dose report. The effective radiation dose delivered was calculated using the dose-length product from the dose report. We compared the effective dose of those who received a Standard CTAP to those who received a Focused Cr. To account for differences in radiation dose over time and by CT scanner, analyses were adjusted for CT dose index volume (CTDIvol) and size-specific dose estimate (SSDE) using quantile regression. Results: A total of 474 patients who underwent CT were included. Prior to CT, 362(76%) had received an ultrasound. In total, 309(65%) patients underwent a Standard CTAP and 165(35%) underwent a Focused CT. The appendix was identified in 259(84%) Standard CTAPs compared to 151(92%) Focused CTs (p = 0.02). Compared to the Standard CTAP, children who received a Focused CT were exposed to a significantly lower effective dose (relative difference: CTDI-adjusted -13%[95%CI:-21,-5]; SSDE-adjusted -14%[95% CI:-24,-31). Conclusions: Our height-based Focused Cr protocol reduces radiation for children undergoing CT evaluation for suspected appendicitis without sacrificing diagnostic accuracy. Further study is needed to validate these findings at other institutions. (C) 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:76 / 79
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Protocol for suspected pediatric appendicitis limits computed tomography utilization
    Wagenaar, Amy E.
    Tashiro, Jun
    Wang, Bo
    Curbelo, Miosotys
    Mendelson, Kenneth L.
    Perez, Eduardo A.
    Hogan, Anthony R.
    Neville, Holly L.
    Sola, Juan E.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 199 (01) : 153 - 158
  • [2] Effect of computed tomography on patient management and costs in children with suspected appendicitis
    Peña, BMG
    Taylor, GA
    Lund, DP
    Mandl, KD
    PEDIATRICS, 1999, 104 (03) : 440 - 446
  • [3] Diagnostic reliability of pediatric appendicitis score, ultrasound and low-dose computed tomography scan in children with suspected acute appendicitis
    Sayed, Ashraf Othman
    Zeidan, Nancy Selim
    Fahmy, Dalia Monir
    Ibrahim, Hossam A.
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2017, 13 : 847 - 854
  • [4] The Accuracy of Low-dose Computed Tomography Protocol in Patients With Suspected Acute Appendicitis The OPTICAP Study
    Sippola, Suvi
    Virtanen, Johanna
    Tammilehto, Ville
    Gronroos, Juha
    Hurme, Saija
    Niiniviita, Hannele
    Lietzen, Elina
    Salminen, Paulina
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2020, 271 (02) : 332 - 338
  • [5] Reducing Radiation Dose in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography We Are Not There Yet
    LaBounty, Troy M.
    JACC-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2020, 13 (02) : 435 - 436
  • [6] Utility of Computed Tomography Overreading and Abdominal Ultrasound in Children With Suspected Appendicitis and Nondiagnostic Computed Tomography at Community Hospitals
    Keating, Elizabeth M.
    Orth, Robert C.
    Bisset, George S.
    Starke, Hannah E.
    Cruz, Andrea T.
    PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY CARE, 2020, 36 (12) : 564 - 570
  • [7] Impact of Radiation Dose Reduction in Abdominal Computed Tomography on Diagnostic Accuracy and Diagnostic Performance in Patients with Suspected Appendicitis: An Intraindividual Comparison
    Storz, Corinna
    Kolb, Manuel
    Kim, Jong Hyo
    Weiss, Jakob
    Kunz, Wolfgang G.
    Nikolaou, Konstantin
    Bamberg, Fabian
    Othman, Ahmed E.
    ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2018, 25 (03) : 309 - 316
  • [8] Diagnostic Usefulness of Low-Dose Nonenhanced Computed Tomography With Coronal Reformations in Patients With Suspected Acute Appendicitis: A Comparison With Standard-Dose Computed Tomography
    Yun, Seong Jong
    Kim, Hyun Cheol
    Yang, Dal Mo
    Kim, Sang Won
    Rhee, Sun Jung
    Shin, Jong Soo
    Ahn, Sung Eun
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2016, 40 (03) : 485 - 492
  • [9] An evidence-based clinical protocol for diagnosis of acute appendicitis decreased the use of computed tomography in children
    Adibe, Obinna O.
    Amin, Sejal R.
    Hansen, Erik N.
    Chong, Albert J.
    Perger, Lena
    Keijzer, Richard
    Muensterer, Oliver J.
    Georgeson, Keith E.
    Harmon, Carroll M.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2011, 46 (01) : 192 - 196
  • [10] The Effect of Computed Tomography on Surgeon's Decisions in Suspected Appendicitis Cases
    Ozturk, Alaattin
    Bozkurtoglu, Hakan
    Uckurt, Yesim
    Kaya, Cengiz
    Yananli, Zuhal Demirhan
    Akinci, Omer Faruk
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND ANALYTICAL MEDICINE, 2015, 6 (06) : 716 - 719