Women's view on shared decision making and autonomy in childbirth: cohort study of Belgian women

被引:8
作者
Deherder, Elke [1 ]
Delbaere, Ilse [1 ]
Macedo, Adriana [2 ,3 ]
Nieuwenhuijze, Marianne J. [4 ]
Van Laere, Sven [5 ]
Beeckman, Katrien [6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] VIVES Univ Appl Sci, Doorniksesteenweg 145, B-8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
[2] Vrije Univ Brussel, Master Management & Policy Hlth Care, Dept Publ Hlth & Nursing, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
[3] Vrije Univ Brussel, Master Management & Policy Hlth Care, Midwifery Unit, UZ Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
[4] Maastricht Univ, Res Ctr Midwifery Sci Maastricht, Zuyd Univ CAPHRI, Univ Singel 60, NL-6229 ER Maastricht, Netherlands
[5] Vrije Univ Brussel, Interfac Ctr Data Proc & Stat, Laarbeeklaan 103, Brussels, Belgium
[6] Vrije Univ Brussel, Univ Ziekenhuis Brussel UZ Brussel, Fac Med & Pharm, Publ Hlth Nursing & Midwifery Res Unit, Laarbeeklaan 101, B-1090 Brussels, Belgium
[7] Univ Antwerp, Verpleeg & Vroedkunde, Ctr Res & Innovat Care, Midwifery Res Educ & Policymaking MIDREP, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
shared decision making; pregnancy; childbirth; autonomy; CARE; BIRTH; EXPERIENCES; HEALTH; SENSE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-022-04890-x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background Health care providers have an important role to share evidence based information and empower patients to make informed choices. Previous studies indicate that shared decision making in pregnancy and childbirth may have an important impact on a woman's birth experience. In Flemish social media, a large number of women expressed their concern about their birth experience, where they felt loss of control and limited possibilities to make their own choices. The aim of this study is to explore autonomy and shared decision making in the Flemish population. Methods This is a cross-sectional, non-interventional study to explore the birth experience of Flemish women. A self-assembled questionnaire was used to collect data, including the Pregnancy and Childbirth Questionnaire (PCQ), the Labor Agentry Scale (LAS), the Mothers Autonomy Decision Making Scale (MADM), the 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q9) and four questions on preparation for childbirth. Women who gave birth two to 12 months ago were recruited by means of social media in the Flemish area (Northern part of Belgium). Linear mixed-effect modelling with backwards variable selection was applied to examine relations with autonomy in decision making. Results In total, 1029 mothers participated in this study of which 617 filled out the survey completely. In general, mothers experienced moderate autonomy in decision-making, both with an obstetrician and with a midwife with an average on the MADM score of respectively 18.5 (+/- 7.2) and 29.4 (+/- 10.4) out of 42. The linear mixed-effects model showed a relationship between autonomy in decision-making (MADM) for the type of healthcare provider (p < 0.001), the level of self-control during labour and birth (LAS) (p = 0.003), the level of perceived quality of care (PCQ) (p < 0.001), having epidural analgesia during childbirth (p = 0.026) and feeling to have received sufficient information about the normal course of childbirth (p < 0.001). Conclusions Childbearing women in Flanders experience moderate levels of autonomy in decision- making with their health care providers, where lower autonomy was observed for obstetricians compared to midwives. Future research should focus more on why differences occur between obstetrics and midwives in terms of autonomy and shared decision-making as perceived by the mother.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] The influence of the systematic birth preparation program on childbirth satisfaction
    Akca, Aysu
    Esmer, Aytul Corbacioglu
    Ozyurek, Eser Sefik
    Aydin, Arife
    Korkmaz, Nazli
    Gorgen, Husnu
    Akbayir, Ozgur
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 295 (05) : 1127 - 1133
  • [2] What determines female autonomy? Evidence from Bangladesh
    Anderson, Siwan
    Eswaran, Mukesh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF DEVELOPMENT ECONOMICS, 2009, 90 (02) : 179 - 191
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2014, Faculty Dent J
  • [4] Christiaens Wendy, 2007, BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, V7, P26
  • [5] Edwards A., 2009, Shared decision-making. Achieving evidence-based patient choice, P3, DOI DOI 10.1108/IJHCQA.2009.06222EAE.003
  • [6] Elwyn G, 2000, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V50, P892
  • [7] Shared Decision Making: A Model for Clinical Practice
    Elwyn, Glyn
    Frosch, Dominick
    Thomson, Richard
    Joseph-Williams, Natalie
    Lloyd, Amy
    Kinnersley, Paul
    Cording, Emma
    Tomson, Dave
    Dodd, Carole
    Rollnick, Stephen
    Edwards, Adrian
    Barry, Michael
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2012, 27 (10) : 1361 - 1367
  • [8] Measuring respect and autonomy in Dutch maternity care: Applicability of two measures
    Feijen-de Jong, E., I
    van der Pijl, M.
    Vedam, S.
    Jansen, D. E. M. C.
    Peters, L. L.
    [J]. WOMEN AND BIRTH, 2020, 33 (05) : E447 - E454
  • [9] Gee RE, 2012, OBSTET GYNECOL, V120, P995, DOI [http://10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827046ac, 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827046ac]
  • [10] Factors related to childbirth satisfaction
    Goodman, P
    Mackey, MC
    Tavakoli, AS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2004, 46 (02) : 212 - 219