Researching Emotion in Courts and the Judiciary: A Tale of Two Projects

被引：25

作者：

Anleu, Sharyn Roach ^{[1
]}

Blix, Stina Bergman ^{[2
]}

Mack, Kathy ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Social & Policy Studies, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia

[2] Stockholm Univ, Dept Sociol, Stockholm, Sweden

[3] Flinders Univ S Australia, Sch Law, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia

来源：

EMOTION REVIEW | 2015年 / 7卷 / 02期

基金：

澳大利亚研究理事会;

关键词：

courts; emotions; multiple methods; the judiciary; LABOR; MAGISTRATES; DEMEANOR; VICTIMS; JUDGES; ELITE;

D O I：

10.1177/1754073914554776

中图分类号：

B84 [心理学];

学科分类号：

04 ; 0402 ;

摘要：

The dominant image of judicial authority is emotional detachment; however, judicial work involves emotion. This presents a challenge for researchers to investigate emotions where they are disavowed. Two projects, one in Australia and another in Sweden, use multiple sociological research methods to study judicial experience, expression, and management of emotion. In both projects, observational research examines judicial officers' display of emotion in court, while interviews investigate judicial emotional experiences. Surveys in Australia identify emotions judicial officers generally find important in their work; in Sweden, shadowing allows researchers to investigate individual judicial emotion experiences and expression. Evaluating the different methods used demonstrates the limitations and effectiveness of particular research designs, the value of multiple methods and the challenges for researching emotion.

引用

页码：145 / 150

页数：6

共 37 条

[11]

Czarniawska Barbara., 2007, SHADOWING OTHER TECH

[12]

Darbyshire P., 2011, Sitting in Judgment: The Working Lives of Judges

[13]

Dobbin SA, 2001, JUSTICE SYST J, V22, P287

[14] Lay people in court: the experience of defendants, eyewitnesses and victims [J].