Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses

被引:24
|
作者
Marret, H
Sauget, S
Giraudeau, B
Body, G
Tranquart, F
机构
[1] INSERM, Fac Med, Clin Invest Ctr 202, Tours, France
[2] Bretonneau Univ Hosp, Dept Gynaecol Obstet Fetal Med & Human Reprod, Tours, France
[3] Bretonneau Univ Hosp, Dept Med Imaging & Ultrasound, Tours, France
关键词
Doppler; ovarian cancer; ovarian mass; power Doppler; quantification; ultrasound; vascularization;
D O I
10.1002/uog.1893
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the performance of a power Doppler vascularity index in the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian malignancy. Methods Adnexal masses (n = 101) were examined prospectively with power Doppler ultrasonography before surgical treatment. The tumor vascularity index (power Doppler index, PDI) was determined by quantification of the number of pixels in a defined region of interest according to the formula: number of colored pixels/(total number of pixels minus the number of pixels in the fluid or avascular areas). It was estimated on selected frames of the tumors using an in-house color-quantifying program added to MATLAB 6.0 (TM) software. Inter- and intraobserver reproducibilities of PDI assessment were evaluated. Intratumoral blood flow velocity waveforms were obtained to determine the lowest resistance index (RI). A subjective visual score of power Doppler signals in the tumor was used to classify it as having low, moderate or high vascularity. The discriminatory ability of this score was compared to that of RI and PDI measurement. Results Histology identified 23 malignant and 78 benign lesions. The PDI was considerably higher in malignant than in benign lesions (0.34 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.12 +/- 0.06; P < 0,001). The intra- and interobserver variabilities of PDI were low (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.99 and 0.97, respectively). The PDI cut-off value to differentiate malignant from benign tumors was set at 0.265 (26.5% of the tumor being colored). Using this cut-off, sensitivity and specificity were 100% (95% CI, 87.8-100.0) and 97.4% (95% CI, 91.0-99.7) compared to 78.3% (95% CI, 56.3-92.S) and 83.1% (95% CI, 72.9-90.7) for RI (cut-off value of 0.53) and 78.3% (95% CI, 56.3-92.5) and 94.9% (9S% CI, 87.4-98.6) for visual scoring. Logistic regression demonstrated that PDI was the best parameter for differentiating between malignant and benign tumors. Conclusion The power Doppler vascularity index obtained using customized color quantifying software has high diagnostic value in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses. Copyright (c) 2005 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 513
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Should Cut-Off Values of the Risk of Malignancy Index be Changed for Evaluation of Adnexal Masses in Asian and Pacific Populations?
    Yavuzcan, Ali
    Caglar, Mete
    Ozgu, Emre
    Ustun, Yusuf
    Dilbaz, Serdar
    Ozdemir, Ismail
    Yildiz, Elif
    Gungor, Tayfun
    Kumru, Selahattin
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2013, 14 (09) : 5455 - 5459
  • [32] Reproducibility of regional placental vascularity/perfusion measurement using 3D power Doppler
    Lai, P. K.
    Wang, Y. A.
    Welsh, A. W.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 36 (02) : 202 - 208
  • [33] Power Doppler Index for preoperative ovarian tumors discrimination
    Marret, H.
    Vinatier, L.
    Sauget, S.
    Giraudeau, B.
    Body, G.
    Tranquart, F.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE & FERTILITE, 2007, 35 (06): : 541 - 547
  • [34] Differential diagnosis of adnexal masses: sequential use of the risk of malignancy index and HistoScanning, a novel computer-aided diagnostic tool
    Vaes, E.
    Manchanda, R.
    Autier, P.
    Nir, R.
    Nir, D.
    Bleiberg, H.
    Robert, A.
    Menon, U.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 39 (01) : 91 - 98
  • [35] An Evaluation of the Applicability of the Risk of Malignancy Index for Adnexal Masses to Patients Seen at a Tertiary Hospital in Chandigarh, India
    Chopra S.
    Vaishya R.
    Kaur J.
    The Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology of India, 2015, 65 (6) : 405 - 410
  • [36] The Accuracy of Risk Malignancy Index in Prediction of Malignancy in Women with Adnexal Mass in Basrah, Iraq
    Al-Asadi, J. N.
    Al-Maliki, S. K.
    Al-Dahhhan, F.
    Al-Naama, L.
    Suood, F.
    NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2018, 21 (10) : 1254 - 1259
  • [37] Predicting the risk of malignancy in adnexal masses based on the Simple Rules from the International Ovarian Tumor Analysis group
    Timmerman, Dirk
    Van Calster, Ben
    Testa, Antonia
    Savelli, Luca
    Fischerova, Daniela
    Froyman, Wouter
    Wynants, Laure
    Van Holsbeke, Caroline
    Epstein, Elisabeth
    Franchi, Dorella
    Kaijser, Jeroen
    Czekierdowski, Artur
    Guerriero, Stefano
    Fruscio, Robert
    Leone, Francesco P. G.
    Rossi, Alberto
    Landolfo, Chiara
    Vergote, Ignace
    Bourne, Tom
    Valentin, Lil
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2016, 214 (04) : 424 - 437
  • [38] Unexpected ovarian malignancy following laparoscopic excision of adnexal masses
    Matsushita, H.
    Watanabe, K.
    Yokoi, T.
    Wakatsuki, A.
    HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2014, 29 (09) : 1912 - 1917
  • [39] Performance of three-dimensional power Doppler angiography as third-step assessment in differential diagnosis of adnexal masses
    Utrilla-Layna, J.
    Alcazar, J. L.
    Auba, M.
    Laparte, C.
    Olartecoechea, B.
    Errasti, T.
    Juez, L.
    Minguez, J. A.
    Guerriero, S.
    Jurado, M.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (05) : 613 - 617
  • [40] Risk of Malignancy Index (RMI) Assessment in Pre and Postmenopausal Women with Adnexal Masses: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Naurin, Rozina
    Naurin, Rubina
    Zafar, Tehmina
    Zafar, Sobia
    Badar, Rubeena
    ANNALS OF KING EDWARD MEDICAL UNIVERSITY LAHORE PAKISTAN, 2024, 30 (03): : 315 - 321