Power Doppler vascularity index for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses

被引:24
|
作者
Marret, H
Sauget, S
Giraudeau, B
Body, G
Tranquart, F
机构
[1] INSERM, Fac Med, Clin Invest Ctr 202, Tours, France
[2] Bretonneau Univ Hosp, Dept Gynaecol Obstet Fetal Med & Human Reprod, Tours, France
[3] Bretonneau Univ Hosp, Dept Med Imaging & Ultrasound, Tours, France
关键词
Doppler; ovarian cancer; ovarian mass; power Doppler; quantification; ultrasound; vascularization;
D O I
10.1002/uog.1893
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
Objective To assess the performance of a power Doppler vascularity index in the preoperative diagnosis of ovarian malignancy. Methods Adnexal masses (n = 101) were examined prospectively with power Doppler ultrasonography before surgical treatment. The tumor vascularity index (power Doppler index, PDI) was determined by quantification of the number of pixels in a defined region of interest according to the formula: number of colored pixels/(total number of pixels minus the number of pixels in the fluid or avascular areas). It was estimated on selected frames of the tumors using an in-house color-quantifying program added to MATLAB 6.0 (TM) software. Inter- and intraobserver reproducibilities of PDI assessment were evaluated. Intratumoral blood flow velocity waveforms were obtained to determine the lowest resistance index (RI). A subjective visual score of power Doppler signals in the tumor was used to classify it as having low, moderate or high vascularity. The discriminatory ability of this score was compared to that of RI and PDI measurement. Results Histology identified 23 malignant and 78 benign lesions. The PDI was considerably higher in malignant than in benign lesions (0.34 +/- 0.04 vs. 0.12 +/- 0.06; P < 0,001). The intra- and interobserver variabilities of PDI were low (intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.99 and 0.97, respectively). The PDI cut-off value to differentiate malignant from benign tumors was set at 0.265 (26.5% of the tumor being colored). Using this cut-off, sensitivity and specificity were 100% (95% CI, 87.8-100.0) and 97.4% (95% CI, 91.0-99.7) compared to 78.3% (95% CI, 56.3-92.S) and 83.1% (95% CI, 72.9-90.7) for RI (cut-off value of 0.53) and 78.3% (95% CI, 56.3-92.5) and 94.9% (9S% CI, 87.4-98.6) for visual scoring. Logistic regression demonstrated that PDI was the best parameter for differentiating between malignant and benign tumors. Conclusion The power Doppler vascularity index obtained using customized color quantifying software has high diagnostic value in discriminating between benign and malignant adnexal masses. Copyright (c) 2005 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:508 / 513
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Contribution of power Doppler blood flow mapping to gray-scale ultrasound for predicting malignancy of adnexal masses in symptomatic and asymptomatic women
    Luis Alcazar, Juan
    Guerriero, Stefano
    Laparte, Carmen
    Ajossa, Silvia
    Jurado, Matias
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2011, 155 (01) : 99 - 105
  • [2] Color Doppler energy prediction of malignancy in adnexal masses using logistic regression models
    Marret, H
    Ecochard, R
    Giraudeau, B
    Golfier, F
    Raudrant, D
    Lansac, J
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 20 (06) : 597 - 604
  • [3] Predicting Risk of Malignancy in Adnexal Masses
    McDonald, John M.
    Doran, Stacey
    DeSimone, Christopher P.
    Ueland, Fred R.
    DePriest, Paul D.
    Ware, Rachel A.
    Saunders, Brook A.
    Pavlik, Edward J.
    Goodrich, Scott
    Kryscio, Richard J.
    van Nagell, John R., Jr.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 115 (04) : 687 - 694
  • [4] Risk of malignancy index for adnexal masses
    Akdeniz, N.
    Kuyumcuoglu, U.
    Kale, A.
    Erdemoglu, M.
    Caca, F.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 30 (02) : 178 - 180
  • [5] Risk of Malignancy Index in the Evaluation of Patients With Adnexal Masses
    Clarke, Sharon E.
    Grimshaw, Robert
    Rittenberg, Paula
    Kieser, Katharina
    Bentley, James
    JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY CANADA, 2009, 31 (05) : 440 - 445
  • [6] The risk of malignancy index in discrimination of adnexal masses
    Ulusoy, S.
    Akbayir, O.
    Numanoglu, C.
    Ulusoy, N.
    Odabas, E.
    Gulkilik, A.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2007, 96 (03) : 186 - 191
  • [7] Role of a Risk of Malignancy Index in Clinical Approaches to Adnexal Masses
    Simsek, Hakki Sencer
    Tokmak, Aytekin
    Ozgu, Emre
    Doganay, Melike
    Danisman, Nuri
    Erkaya, Salim
    Gungor, Tayfun
    ASIAN PACIFIC JOURNAL OF CANCER PREVENTION, 2014, 15 (18) : 7793 - 7797
  • [8] The risk of malignancy index (RMI) in women with adnexal masses in Wales
    Abdulrahman, Ganiy Opeyemi, Jr.
    McKnight, Liam
    Singh, Kerryn Lutchman
    TAIWANESE JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 53 (03): : 376 - 381
  • [9] Evaluation of the risk malignancy index diagnostic value in patients with adnexal masses
    Terzic, Milan
    Dotlic, Jelena
    Ladjevic, Ivana Likic
    Atanackovic, Jasmina
    Ladjevic, Nebojsa
    VOJNOSANITETSKI PREGLED, 2011, 68 (07) : 589 - 593
  • [10] Risk of malignancy index in discrimination between benign and malignant adnexal masses
    Ristic, A.
    Filimonovic, D.
    Dzatic-Smijkovic, O.
    Dimitrijevic, D.
    Anicic, R.
    Mihajlovic, S.
    Ardalic, D.
    Srbinovic, L.
    Dukic, M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GYNAECOLOGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 39 (05) : 733 - 736