Stereopsis and Response Times between Collegiate Table Tennis Athletes and Non-Athletes

被引:5
作者
Lee, Jiahn-Shing [1 ,2 ]
Chang, Shih-Tsung [3 ]
Shieh, Li-Chuan [4 ]
Lim, Ai-Yin [5 ]
Peng, Wei-Sheng [5 ]
Chen, Wei-Min [5 ]
Liu, Yen-Hsiu [1 ,6 ]
See, Lai-Chu [5 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Chang Gung Mem Hosp Linkou, Dept Ophthalmol, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
[3] Chung Yuan Christian Univ, Off Phys Educ, Taoyuan 320314, Taiwan
[4] Univ Taipei, Grad Inst Sports Training, Taipei 11153, Taiwan
[5] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, Coll Med, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
[6] Chang Gung Univ, Dept Phys Educ, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
[7] Chang Gung Univ, Mol Med Res Ctr, Biostat Core Lab, Taoyuan 33302, Taiwan
[8] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Div Rheumatol Allergy & Immunol, Taoyuan 33305, Taiwan
关键词
table tennis; athletes; stereopsis; eye-hand response time; REFRACTIVE ERRORS; PLAYERS; VISION; SPORTS; PERFORMANCE; ACUITY; ELITE;
D O I
10.3390/ijerph18126287
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Table tennis athletes and non-athletes potentially differ in stereopsis and eye-hand response times (RT), but whether stereopsis correlates with response time has scarcely been discussed. We aimed to compare stereopsis and RT between collegiate table tennis athletes and non-athletes and to examine the correlation between stereopsis and RT. From December 2016 to October 2019, table tennis athletes (n = 80) and non-athletes (n = 56) were recruited. Stereopsis was measured in four modes (A25, A50, R25, R50: approaching and receding directions at 25 mm/s or 50 mm/s). RT was measured with simple and choice tasks at zero, shoulder, and random distance. For stereopsis, the judged deviations were smaller during the approaching phases. Men had smaller A25 than women (p =0.012), whereas table tennis athletes showed smaller R25 and A50 than non-athletes (p = 0.03, 0.01, respectively). RT increased from simple to choice conditions and from zero to random, followed by shoulder distance. Men were significantly faster than women in choice tasks (p < 0.01). Table tennis athletes performed better in RT than the non-athletes (p < 0.05). No correlation was observed between stereopsis and RT (r = -0.01 to 0.12). In conclusion, athletes from table tennis sports showed better stereopsis and RT than non-athletes. Men had better stereopsis and RT than women. There was no correlation between stereopsis and RT.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Gender differences in choice reaction time: evidence for differential strategies [J].
Adam, JJ ;
Paas, FGWC ;
Buekers, MJ ;
Wuyts, IJ ;
Spijkers, WAC ;
Wallmeyer, P .
ERGONOMICS, 1999, 42 (02) :327-335
[2]   COINCIDENCE-ANTICIPATION TIMING AND REACTION TIME IN YOUTH TENNIS AND TABLE TENNIS PLAYERS [J].
Ak, Emre ;
Kocak, Settar .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2010, 110 (03) :879-887
[3]  
American Optometric Association, 2020, OPTOMETRIC CLIN PRAC, V2, P7
[4]   Central and peripheral visual reaction time of soccer players and nonathletes [J].
Ando, S ;
Kida, N ;
Oda, S .
PERCEPTUAL AND MOTOR SKILLS, 2001, 92 (03) :786-794
[5]   Sports vision training: A review of the state-of-the-art in digital training techniques [J].
Appelbaum, L. Gregory ;
Erickson, Graham .
INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF SPORT AND EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY, 2018, 11 (01) :160-189
[6]  
Bamne Shrikrishna N, 2011, Indian J Physiol Pharmacol, V55, P388
[7]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[8]   Prediction of Pilot's Reaction Time Based on EEG Signals [J].
Binias, Bartosz ;
Myszor, Dariusz ;
Palus, Henryk ;
Cyran, Krzysztof A. .
FRONTIERS IN NEUROINFORMATICS, 2020, 14
[9]  
BLAKE R, 1980, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V19, P930
[10]   A comparison of static near stereo acuity in youth baseball/softball players and non-ball players [J].
Boden, Lauren M. ;
Rosengren, Kenneth J. ;
Martin, Daniel F. ;
Boden, Scott D. .
OPTOMETRY-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN OPTOMETRIC ASSOCIATION, 2009, 80 (03) :121-125